Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Monarchy in the Vedic Age

Monarchy in the Vedic Age Footnotes 1. See my Ancient Indian Warfare with Special Reference to the Vedic Period (Leiden, 1965), pp. 135 ff. Also, my Ancient Indian Warfare , (Delhi: 1989). 2 RV. 1.103.5. 3 RV. VIII.35.I7; cf. SV. IV.II.A.1; AB. VIII.4.12. For Indra as the prototype and guardian of kingship, see R. N. Dandekar , “ Vrtrahā Indra ”, ABORI 31 ( 1950 ), p. 53 , fn.2 . 4 RV III.43.5. 5 Ibid. , IX.35.5. 6 Ibid. , 1.162;163. 7 Ibid. , VIII.35.16–18. 8 Ibid. , X.90.12. Compare the patrician gentes of Rome, the eupatridae of Athens, the nobles of early Germany, the eorls of the Anglo‐Saxons, and the athravas and rathaesthas of ancient Iran. Cf. CHI , I , p. 125 . 9 RV. IV.42.1; VII.64.2; VIII.25.8; X.109.3; VIII.67.1. 10 See V. M. Apte , “ Were castes formulated in the Rgveda? BDCRI II , p. 47 . Another Rgvedic passage, v.54.7, implies a distinction between the rsi and the rājan. 11 There is no need to take the word “election” in its twentieth century sense. 12 RV. X.173.1, viśas tvā sarvā vānchantu. The word gana in RV. IV.35.3 and elsewhere seems to indicate a republican form of government. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Politics and History Wiley

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/monarchy-in-the-vedic-age-r7kr6VEzaX

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0004-9522
eISSN
1467-8497
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-8497.1989.tb01295.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Footnotes 1. See my Ancient Indian Warfare with Special Reference to the Vedic Period (Leiden, 1965), pp. 135 ff. Also, my Ancient Indian Warfare , (Delhi: 1989). 2 RV. 1.103.5. 3 RV. VIII.35.I7; cf. SV. IV.II.A.1; AB. VIII.4.12. For Indra as the prototype and guardian of kingship, see R. N. Dandekar , “ Vrtrahā Indra ”, ABORI 31 ( 1950 ), p. 53 , fn.2 . 4 RV III.43.5. 5 Ibid. , IX.35.5. 6 Ibid. , 1.162;163. 7 Ibid. , VIII.35.16–18. 8 Ibid. , X.90.12. Compare the patrician gentes of Rome, the eupatridae of Athens, the nobles of early Germany, the eorls of the Anglo‐Saxons, and the athravas and rathaesthas of ancient Iran. Cf. CHI , I , p. 125 . 9 RV. IV.42.1; VII.64.2; VIII.25.8; X.109.3; VIII.67.1. 10 See V. M. Apte , “ Were castes formulated in the Rgveda? BDCRI II , p. 47 . Another Rgvedic passage, v.54.7, implies a distinction between the rsi and the rājan. 11 There is no need to take the word “election” in its twentieth century sense. 12 RV. X.173.1, viśas tvā sarvā vānchantu. The word gana in RV. IV.35.3 and elsewhere seems to indicate a republican form of government.

Journal

Australian Journal of Politics and HistoryWiley

Published: Dec 1, 1989

There are no references for this article.