Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Pindyck (2006)
Uncertainty in Environmental EconomicsReview of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1
Graham (1992)
Public expenditure under uncertainty: the net benefit criteriaAmerican Economic Review, 82
M. Ben-Akiva, J. Swait (1986)
The Akaike Likelihood Ratio IndexTransp. Sci., 20
Gregory Poe, Kelly Giraud, J. Loomis (2001)
Simple Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions: Application to Internal and External Scope Tests in Contingent Valuation
Mary Riddel (2011)
Uncertainty and measurement error in welfare models for risk changesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61
Daniel Graham, Daniel Graham (2007)
American Economic Association Public Expenditure Under Uncertainty : The Net-Benefit Criteria
D. Graham (1977)
Cost-Benefit Analysis Under Uncertainty
F. Knight (2009)
The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit
W. Hanemann (1984)
Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete ResponsesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66
D. Schkade, J. Payne (1994)
How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental RegulationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26
U. Gneezy, J. List, George Wu (2006)
The uncertainty effect: When a risky prospect is valued less than its worst possible outcomeFramed Field Experiments
D. Rigby, F. Alcon, M. Burton (2010)
Supply uncertainty and the economic value of irrigation waterEuropean Review of Agricultural Economics, 37
Charles Holt, Susan Laury (2002)
Risk Aversion and Incentive EffectsAndrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper Series
S. Hess (2005)
Advanced discrete choice models with applications to transport demand
Daniel Burghart, T. Cameron, Geoffrey Gerdes (2007)
Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: Risks, scenario adjustments, and inattentionJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 35
Ondřej Rydval, A. Ortmann, Sasha Prokosheva, R. Hertwig (2009)
How certain is the uncertainty effect?Experimental Economics, 12
J. Whitehead (1992)
Ex ante willingness to pay with supply and demand uncertainty: implications for valuing a sea turtle protection programmeApplied Economics, 24
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (1979)
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47
W. Desvousges, V. Smith, A. Fisher (1987)
Option price estimates for water quality improvements: A contingent valuation study for the monongahela riverJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14
K. Glenk, S. Colombo (2011)
Designing policies to mitigate the agricultural contribution to climate change: an assessment of soil based carbon sequestration and its ancillary effectsClimatic Change, 105
D. Kahneman (2007)
Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) :
M. Plummer (1986)
Supply Uncertainty, Option Price, and Option Value: An ExtensionLand Economics, 62
M. Farsi (2010)
Risk aversion and willingness to pay for energy efficient systems in rental apartmentsEnergy Policy, 38
J. Bennett, M. Bueren, S. Whitten (2004)
Estimating Society's Willingness to Pay to Maintain Viable Rural CommunitiesPublic Choice & Political Economy eJournal
K. Glenk, S. Colombo (2011)
How Sure Can You Be? A Framework for Considering Delivery Uncertainty in Benefit Assessments Based on Stated Preference MethodsJournal of Agricultural Economics, 62
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Direct Risk Aversion Evidence From Risky Prospects Valued Below Their Worst Outcome
Gregory Poe, Michael Welsh, P. Champ (1997)
Measuring the Difference in Mean Willingness to Pay When Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Responses Are Not IndependentLand Economics, 73
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1981)
The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science, 211 4481
Cameron (2005)
Individual option prices for climate change mitigationJournal of Public Economics, 89
R. Ready (1993)
The Choice of a Welfare Measure under UncertaintyAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75
I. Krinsky, A. Robb (1986)
On Approximating the Statistical Properties of ElasticitiesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 68
C. Smith, John Neumann, O. Morgenstern (1945)
Theory of Games and Economic Behavior.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 40
G. Bush, S. Colombo, N. Hanley (2009)
Should all Choices Count? Using the Cut-Offs Approach to Edit Responses in a Choice ExperimentEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 44
S. Akter, J. Bennett, Michael Ward (2012)
Climate change scepticism and public support for mitigation: Evidence from an Australian choice experimentGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 22
T. Cameron (2002)
Individual Option Prices for Climate Change Mitigation
C. Starmer (2000)
Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under RiskJournal of Economic Literature, 38
Gregory Poe, Kelly Giraud, J. Loomis (2005)
Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical DistributionsEconometric Modeling: Agriculture
J. Quiggin (1994)
Generalized expected utility theory : the rank-dependent modelThe Economic Journal, 104
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1992)
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertaintyJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5
Zheng Li, D. Hensher, J. Rose (2010)
Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: A review and some new empirical evidenceTransportation Research Part E-logistics and Transportation Review, 46
G. Keren, M. Willemsen (2009)
Decision anomalies, experimenter assumptions, and participants' comprehension : revaluating the uncertainty effectJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22
A. Palma, M. Ben-Akiva, D. Brownstone, Charles Holt, T. Magnac, D. McFadden, P. Moffatt, N. Picard, K. Train, P. Wakker, Joan Walker (2008)
Risk, uncertainty and discrete choice modelsMarketing Letters, 19
D. Roberts, T. Boyer, J. Lusk (2008)
Preferences for environmental quality under uncertaintyEcological Economics, 66
A. Freeman (1985)
Supply Uncertainty, Option Price, and Option ValueLand Economics, 62
In this study, we introduce information on outcome‐related risk as an additional attribute in a choice model of preferences for a land‐based climate change mitigation project. We provide a comprehensive comparison of different model specifications arising from different behavioural assumptions about the way that respondents process information on outcome‐related risk within the choice task. We find significant differences between several specifications in terms of both model fit and WTP estimates. The behavioural assumptions made when choosing a particular model specification, and reasons that motivate them should be made explicit, and consequences of using different specifications should not be ignored.
The Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2013
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.