Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Patrick Hays, D. Upton (1986)
A Shifting Regimes Approach to the Stationarity of the Market Model Parameters of Individual SecuritiesJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21
R. Quandt (1958)
The Estimation of the Parameters of a Linear Regression System Obeying Two Separate RegimesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 53
Stanley Kon, F. Jen (1979)
The Investment Performance of Mutual Funds: An Empirical Investigation of Timing, Selectivity, and Market EfficiencyThe Journal of Business, 52
H. Izan (1985)
Testing for Changes in Relative RiskAustralian Journal of Management, 10
Richard Roll (1978)
AMBIGUITY WHEN PERFORMANCE IS MEASURED BY THE SECURITIES MARKET LINEJournal of Finance, 33
T. Miller, N. Gressis (1980)
Nonstationarity and Evaluation of Mutual Fund PerformanceJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15
R. Quandt (1960)
Tests of the Hypothesis That a Linear Regression System Obeys Two Separate RegimesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 55
Henriksson (1981)
On Market Timing and Investment Performance: Statistical Procedures for Evaluating Forecasting SkillsJournal of Business, 54
Merton (1981)
On Market Timing and Investment Performance: An Equilibrium Theory of Value for Market ForecastsJournal of Business, 54
Treynor Treynor, Mazuy Mazuy (1966)
Can Mutual Funds Outguess the MarketHarvard Business Review, 44
H. White (1980)
A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 48
G. Alexander, P. Benson, C. Eger (1982)
Timing Decisions and the Behavior of Mutual Fund Systematic RiskJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 17
Robert Brown, J. Durbin, J. Evans (1975)
Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships Over TimeJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 37
Stanley Kon, F. Jen (1978)
Estimation of Time-Varying Systematic Risk and Performance for Mutual Fund Portfolios: An Application of Switching RegressionJournal of Finance, 33
J. Lintner (1965)
THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETSThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 47
W. Sharpe (1964)
CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*Journal of Finance, 19
W. Breen, R. Jagannathan, A. Ofer (1986)
Correcting for Heteroscedasticity in Tests for Market Timing AbilityThe Journal of Business, 59
Roy. Henriksson (1984)
Market Timing and Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical InvestigationThe Journal of Business, 57
R. Jagannathan, Robert Korajczyk (1985)
Assessing the Market Timing Performance of Managed PortfoliosAdvanced Risk & Portfolio Management® Research Paper Series
E. Chang, Wilbur Lewellen (1984)
Market Timing and Mutual Fund Investment PerformanceThe Journal of Business, 57
Abstract: The performance of pooled superannuation funds is analysed within a framework that recognises that risk management or ‘market timing’ is an important aspect of the fund manager's decision‐making. Two broad appraoches to the issue of ‘market timing’ are adopted: first, the performance evaluation model developed by Henriksson and Merton (1981) which allows for return differentials to arise from both security selection and market timing; and second, the recursive residuals methodology of Brown, Durbin and Evans (1975) which identifies points in chronological time when the risks of the funds underwent a change. The results indicate that only 5 out of 16 funds had significant shifts in their risk over the period of the study, all of which occurred in late 1986 to early 1987. It follows that the usual Jensen measure of performance is inappropriate for these funds since one component of their performance is due to market timing activities. The return performance of these market timing activities is significantly negative for 15 to 16 funds indicating that their timing ability is perverse. To some extent this is an artifact of the market crash of October 1987 and that all funds had a positive exposure to equities. However, due to their asset allocation policies all funds are assigned significantly positive security selection performance.
Accounting & Finance – Wiley
Published: May 1, 1990
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.