Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Christensen Christensen, Johnson Johnson (1935)
Field reaction of varieties and selfed lines of corn to different collections of U. maydisJ. Agric. Res, 51
König König (1971)
Untersuchungen zur Ökologie des Maisbeulenbrandes (U. maydis (D. C.) Corda)Bayer. Landw. Jb, 48
Ullstrup Ullstrup (1969)
Weather and corn disease in 1968Abs. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci, 78
Sidenko Sidenko (1975)
The formation of galls under the influence of U. maydis (D. C.) Cda. in the ontogenesis of maize, c.fRev. Plant Path, 1976
F. Unger
Ueber den Einfluss des Bodens auf die Vertheilung der Gewächse, nachgewiesen in der Vegetation des nordöstlichen Tirol's
Masler Masler, Piovarci Piovarci (1968)
Assessment of resistance in self‐pollinated lines of maize to U. maydis (D. C.) Cda. c.fRev. Plant Path, 1969
Nemlienko Nemlienko, Kulil Kulil (1965)
Resistance of maize to blister smut. c.fRev. Plant Path, 1965
Stevenson Stevenson, Johnson Johnson (1944)
The nomenclature of cereal smut fungiPlant Disease Reptr, 28
Pogorelova Pogorelova (1965)
Susceptibility of maize varieties and hybrids to blister smut in relation to annual meteorological conditions, c.fRev. Plant Path, 1966
W. Krüger (1983)
Bekämpfung von Rapskrankheiten. I: Verringerung des Befalls mit Phoma lingam bei Raps und Methoden zur Bestimmung der Anfälligkeit von SortenJournal of Phytopathology, 108
Bassi Bassi, Burnett Burnett (1980)
The genetic architecture of aggressiveness of Ustilago maydis. AnnApp. Biol, 94
Batiashviu Batiashviu (1976)
Pathogenicity of the pathogen of maize smut U. zeae (Beckm.) Unger. c.fRev. Plant Path, 1978
F. Bassi, J. Burnett (1980)
I. Pathogenic variation in fungi and bacteria and mycorrhizal compatibility: The genetic architecture of aggressiveness in Ustilago maydisAnnals of Applied Biology, 94
Sidenko Sidenko (1971)
Evaluation of resistance in maize to blister smut. c.fRev. Plant Path, 1971
Krüger Krüger (1973)
Untersuchungen Liber die künstliche Infektion des Maises durch den Maisbeulenbrand (U. maydis (D. C.) Corda) in kühleren GebietenNachrichtenbl. Pflanzenschutzd, 25
Krüger Krüger (1983)
Bekämpfung von Rapskrankheiten. I. Verringerung des Befalls mit Phano lingam bei Raps und Methoden zur Bestimmung der Anfällig‐keit von SortenPhytopath. Z, 108
Pervova Pervova (1972)
Anatomy of maize irradiated with Cs‐137 and inoculated with U. maydis (D. C.) Cda. c.LRev. Plant Path, 1973
Saluns'ka Saluns'ka (1971)
Dependence of the development of blister smut of maize on meteorological conditions, c.fRev. Plant Path, 1972
Lopez Lopez, Romero Romero (1983)
Factors affecting the development of common smut caused by U. maydis (D. C.) CdaPhytopath, 73
Sultan Sultan, Jovicevic Jovicevic (1982)
Contribution to the study of resistance of inbred lines of maize to U. maydis (D. C.) Cda. c.fRev. Plant Path, 1982
Beckmann Beckmann (1768)
Des Herrn Tillet Beobachtung einer Krankheit des turkischer Weitzens oder des MaisHannoverisches Magazin, 6
Legros Legros, Greenen Greenen (1979)
Current problems concerning protection of important crops. 5. Mais smut. c.fRev. Plant Path., 1980
Maksimova Maksimova (1982)
The progeny of smut spores of U. zeae (Beckm.) Unger obtained from crossing prototrophic of auxotrophic strains, c.fRev. Plant Path, 1982
Krüger Krüger (1972)
Untersuchungen über die Anfäl‐ligkeit von Maissorten gegen die Stammfäule und Beulcnbrand, verursacht durch Fusarium‐Arten bzw. U. maydis. NachrichtenblDeut. Pflanzen-schutzd. (Braunschweig), 24
Radulescu Radulescu, Munteanu Munteanu, Cabulea Cabulea (1973)
The variability of virulence in U. maydis (D. C.) Cda. during the development of maize inbred lines and hybrids, c.fRev. Plant Path, 1974
A field experiment was carried out during the growing seasons 1982, 1983 and 1984 to evaluate the reaction of different maize hybrids and lines to smut disease and to give further informations on the effect of environmental factors on smut incidence. The kernels of 17 different maize hybrids and 17 inbred line were planted in the field and the stand was maintained constant of 30 plants per row during the respective years. Each plant was subjected to an artificial infection by dropping 2 ml of U. maydis‐spore suspension into the leaf whorl at 6–8 leaf stage. Field observations, concerning the number, the size and location of smut galls were recorded for each individual plant whenever the symptoms appeared. The reaction of maize genotypes was evaluated on a new classified system and the differential response was correlated with the changes ol meteorological data. The results indicated that hybrids: Circe LG9, E1, Kaceplns, Limac‐LG11 and RA 94A x RA 320 as well as lines: F2, L1, L2, L8, RA 94A, RA 320, W33 and W401 were highly resistant; while the hybrids E2, F7 x EP1.J and Giga as well as lines: EP1J, F115, L5 and L6 were highly susceptible. The reaction of these genotypes exhibited an identical behaviour during the 3 years. The remaining genotypes were unstable and showed differential response to degree of infection and location of smut galls. The increase of smut infection in 1982 relative to that recorded in 1984, under the same wet weather conditions, was attributed to the increase of air temperature and sunshine duration. Under dry weather condition, as in 1983, increasing temperature and sunshine duration had little effect on smut incidence.
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1989
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.