Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Liberal Nationalism and Communitarianism: An Ambiguous Association

Liberal Nationalism and Communitarianism: An Ambiguous Association NOTES 1 E. J. Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism since 1780 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 183. 2 The focus of this paper is largely on Western Anglophone political theory. As such I realise that one of the major absences from this paper is the recent development of subaltern (postcolonial) studies in the literature on nationalism and community; see R. Guha, Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1982), and R. O'Hanlon , “ Recovering the Subject: Subaltern Studies and Histories of Resistance in Colonial South Asia ”, Modern Asian Studies 22 ( 1988 ): 189 – 224 . For the sake of brevity and sharper focus I have concentrated, in the present paper, on the “Western” literature. I hope to extend some of the present arguments in future into the area of subaltern studies. 3 See P. Heelas, Scott Lash and P. Morris, eds, Detraditionalization (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996). 4 In fact a spectrum of strong to weak would be a safer image. 5 See R. Plant, H. Lesser and P. Taylor‐Gooby, Political Philosophy and Social Welfare (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980), p. 243. 6 This task would take, in fact, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Politics and History Wiley

Liberal Nationalism and Communitarianism: An Ambiguous Association

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/liberal-nationalism-and-communitarianism-an-ambiguous-association-0RL7KKqG3Y

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0004-9522
eISSN
1467-8497
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-8497.1997.tb01375.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

NOTES 1 E. J. Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism since 1780 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 183. 2 The focus of this paper is largely on Western Anglophone political theory. As such I realise that one of the major absences from this paper is the recent development of subaltern (postcolonial) studies in the literature on nationalism and community; see R. Guha, Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1982), and R. O'Hanlon , “ Recovering the Subject: Subaltern Studies and Histories of Resistance in Colonial South Asia ”, Modern Asian Studies 22 ( 1988 ): 189 – 224 . For the sake of brevity and sharper focus I have concentrated, in the present paper, on the “Western” literature. I hope to extend some of the present arguments in future into the area of subaltern studies. 3 See P. Heelas, Scott Lash and P. Morris, eds, Detraditionalization (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996). 4 In fact a spectrum of strong to weak would be a safer image. 5 See R. Plant, H. Lesser and P. Taylor‐Gooby, Political Philosophy and Social Welfare (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980), p. 243. 6 This task would take, in fact,

Journal

Australian Journal of Politics and HistoryWiley

Published: Jan 1, 1997

There are no references for this article.