Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Lewis’s Woodpecker nest success and habitat selection in floodplain and burned forests in western Montana

Lewis’s Woodpecker nest success and habitat selection in floodplain and burned forests in western... For species with declining populations across their range, such as Lewis’s Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis), understanding habitat selection and its influence on reproductive outcomes are critical for effective management, especially in human‐modified landscapes. We identified factors associated with habitat selection by Lewis’s Woodpeckers in the floodplain and burned forests across the Bitterroot Valley in Montana. We estimated population densities, determined reproductive outcomes, and examined the possible influence of forest characteristics on nest‐site selection. Mean adult population densities of Lewis’s Woodpeckers were over three times greater in floodplain forest than burned forest (13.2 adults/km2 vs. 4.1 adults/km2, respectively). However, nest success was lower in floodplain (73%; CI = 62%, 82%) than in burned forest (88%; CI = 78%, 94%). Nest success also declined across the breeding season. Lewis’s Woodpeckers in the floodplain forest were more likely to nest in cavities in taller trees, forested areas with reduced canopy cover, and stands with more trees. In burned forests, the height of nest trees was the only distinguishing feature of nest‐site selection. However, the characteristics of nest sites used by Lewis’s Woodpeckers did not predict nest success. Ultimately, nest success was high in both forest types and both play an important role in maintaining populations of Lewis’s Woodpeckers in our study system. Management strategies to conserve habitat for Lewis’s Woodpeckers in western Montana should focus on retention of trees and snags > 18 m in height in both forest types, as well as enhancing recruitment of cottonwoods in a floodplain forest. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Field Ornithology Wiley

Lewis’s Woodpecker nest success and habitat selection in floodplain and burned forests in western Montana

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/lewis-s-woodpecker-nest-success-and-habitat-selection-in-floodplain-dzW2ImpI23

References (34)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 Association of Field Ornithologists
ISSN
0273-8570
eISSN
1557-9263
DOI
10.1111/jofo.12394
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

For species with declining populations across their range, such as Lewis’s Woodpeckers (Melanerpes lewis), understanding habitat selection and its influence on reproductive outcomes are critical for effective management, especially in human‐modified landscapes. We identified factors associated with habitat selection by Lewis’s Woodpeckers in the floodplain and burned forests across the Bitterroot Valley in Montana. We estimated population densities, determined reproductive outcomes, and examined the possible influence of forest characteristics on nest‐site selection. Mean adult population densities of Lewis’s Woodpeckers were over three times greater in floodplain forest than burned forest (13.2 adults/km2 vs. 4.1 adults/km2, respectively). However, nest success was lower in floodplain (73%; CI = 62%, 82%) than in burned forest (88%; CI = 78%, 94%). Nest success also declined across the breeding season. Lewis’s Woodpeckers in the floodplain forest were more likely to nest in cavities in taller trees, forested areas with reduced canopy cover, and stands with more trees. In burned forests, the height of nest trees was the only distinguishing feature of nest‐site selection. However, the characteristics of nest sites used by Lewis’s Woodpeckers did not predict nest success. Ultimately, nest success was high in both forest types and both play an important role in maintaining populations of Lewis’s Woodpeckers in our study system. Management strategies to conserve habitat for Lewis’s Woodpeckers in western Montana should focus on retention of trees and snags > 18 m in height in both forest types, as well as enhancing recruitment of cottonwoods in a floodplain forest.

Journal

Journal of Field Ornithology – Wiley

Published: Dec 1, 2021

Keywords: cottonwood forest; ecological trap; nest‐site selection; population density; reproductive outcomes; species of concern

There are no references for this article.