Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Much has changed in the field of music analysis since Joseph Kerman's ‘How We Got Into Analysis, and How to Get Out’ rippled through the discipline (1980). If Kerman's impassioned call for a move away from formalism towards ‘criticism’ was met with some resistance,1 so it also provided grounds for rethinking the role of analysis in connecting musical material to the wider world.2 One recalls, among other scholarship, Susan McClary's influential accounts of the ways in which music not only represents but actively shapes ideas of gender and sexuality (see also Citron 1993 and 1990; Solie 1993; and Brett, Wood and Thomas 1994). McClary's (1991 and 1994) approach – whether in terms of hearing homosexuality in Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky's Fourth Symphony, Op. 36, or detecting alternative constructions of masculinity in Franz Schubert's ‘Unfinished’ Symphony, D. 759 – has offered profound ways of transforming the question of ‘how to get out of analysis’ into how to engage analysis as a tool for situating music in histories of thought, feeling, sound and sensation. Turning to performance has further broadened the boundaries of what analysis can be and do, with hermeneutic, text‐based interpretations giving way to corporeal engagement with music, as seen
Music Analysis – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.