Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in the Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in the... INTRODUCTIONCervical cancer is a public health concern being the fourth most common cancer among women in incidence and mortality,1,2 with 570 000 new cases in 2018 representing 6.6% of all female cancers worldwide.2,3 Approximately 90% of all new cervical cancer cases occur in low‐ and middle‐income countries and is also the second most common cancer among women in sub‐Saharan Africa.1,2 In 2018, 26 009 women were living with cervical cancer in East Africa, which accounted for 26.2% of all cancer cases among women in the region, Tanzania accounting for 39% of all cases.1 The prevalence of cervical cancer among women living with HIV is high and more alarming in sub‐Saharan Africa. Prevalence is estimated to range between 1.3% in Kenya and 6% in Nigeria.4‐8 Within Tanzania, the prevalence ranges from 7.3% in Mwanza to 11% in Morogoro,9,10 higher than that reported in Nigeria. Poor screening practices may partly contribute to the high prevalence of cervical cancer among WLHIV in Tanzania.Virtually, all cervical cancer cases (99%) are associated with genital infection with high‐risk human papillomavirus (HPV)—a widespread virus transmitted through sexual contact.2,11‐13 WLHIV have a higher risk of developing the disease, mainly due to their immune‐compromised state.1,9,10,14‐16 Knowledge and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening are crucial in determining the screening intervention's uptake among women.17‐20 The belief of not being susceptible to cervical cancer, fear of cancer diagnosis, fear of exposing their (women's) private parts, anticipated pain of the testing procedure, a long distance from home to the clinic, poor access to screening results, long waiting time, and fewer healthcare workers are other barriers to cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV.18,21‐23Despite the heavy burden of the disease, cervical cancer is a highly preventable disease in women, including those living with HIV.19,24 WHO introduced comprehensive cervical cancer prevention in 2014, which comprises cervical cancer screening, targeting women who are at higher risk of developing the disease.24 With the introduction of mass HPV vaccination for young girls in some developing countries, there are opportunities to offer the vaccine to HIV‐positive middle‐aged women through the existing HIV care and treatment programs.16 In Tanzania, cervical cancer screening has been integrated into HIV care and treatment services where screening is initiated soon after HIV diagnosis without regarding the woman's age and is conducted annually.25Despite that, the proportion of HIV‐positive women screened for cervical cancer in CTC is low. In Dar Es Salaam, only 9% of women living with HIV ever had at least one cervical cancer screening test.26 However, this study was conducted before the integration of cervical cancer screening in routine HIV care. Since this integration, little has been done to assess the uptake of cervical cancer screening services among women living with HIV in Tanzania. This study aimed to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and cervical cancer screening practices among WLHIV in the Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania, following the integration of these services in CTC services. Findings from this study will provide information to assess the efficacy of this program and inform future interventions. These findings may also assist the healthcare providers, particularly at CTC, in promoting the uptake of cervical cancer screening services among WLHIV. Moreover, the study results may contribute to developing policies, guidelines, and strategic decisions that will enhance the current screening practices in this population.MATERIALS AND METHODSStudy design, setting, and populationWe conducted a health facility‐based cross‐sectional study in the Kilimanjaro region between 21 August and 3 September 2020. The region has 396 health facilities that are 20 hospitals, 41 health centers, and 335 dispensaries. Out of these health facilities, 52 provide care and treatment (CTC) services.27,28 CTC is the gateway where people living with HIV can access HIV care, treatment, and support services.25 The prevalence of HIV in the Kilimanjaro region was 2.6% and was high (3.1%) among women aged 15 years and above.29,30 The study population was all WLHIV in the Kilimanjaro region and were attending CTC at data collection time. The study included all women aged 18 to 55 years who provided informed consent. In Tanzania, WLHIV are supposed to be screened for cervical cancer immediately after HIV diagnosis.25 The study excluded severely ill women and had undergone total hysterectomy because severely ill women could not respond to the questions. The women with total hysterectomy had their cervix surgically removed.Sample size and samplingThe sample size was calculated using the formula for estimating a single proportion, given as (N = [Za/2]2 × p[1−p]/e2), where N is the desired sample size, and p is the estimated prevalence of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV, assumed to be 20%. Furthermore, e is the margin of error or precision (5%), and Z is the standard normal value (1.96) corresponding to a 95% confidence interval. After adding a 10% proportion of nonresponse, the minimum estimated sample size was 271 participants.A simple random sampling technique was used to select Hai among the rural districts of the Kilimanjaro region. Moshi municipality was purposefully selected to ensure rural–urban representativeness. One CTC in each district with the highest number of women enrolled was selected (Hai district hospital and Mawenzi regional referral hospital). All women who attended the CTCs were selected for inclusion. Sampling was done proportional to the size of each selected CTC.Data collection methodsFace‐to‐face interviews were used for data collection using an electronic administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was adapted and modified from previous studies.31,32 The questionnaire was in both English and Swahili languages. It contained information on participant social‐demographic characteristics, knowledge, and attitudes on cervical cancer screening, cervical cancer screening practices, and HIV care and treatment. Trained doctor of medicine students collected data. The interviews were administered in Swahili (local) language and were conducted in a quiet place around the CTC clinics after obtaining informed consent. Each interview took about 20 to 30 minutes.Study variablesThe primary outcome was cervical cancer screening practice measured by asking women if they had ever screened for cervical cancer or not, the reason for screening, the timing of screening since diagnosed with HIV, and whether they had ever screened in the past 12 months.Knowledge and attitudes on cervical cancer screening were secondary outcomes. Knowledge of cervical cancer was measured by asking participants if they ever heard cervical cancer and knowledge of causes, signs, risk factors, and prevention. Knowledge of causes was measured using five‐item questions, the signs using 11 items, risk factors using 12 items, and prevention using 5 items. Each of these items carried one point when answered correctly and zero points when wrongly answered. Final scores were categorized into good knowledge (≥50% of the scores) and poor if otherwise.13 Attitude on cervical cancer screening was measured by asking the participant 10 questions concerning thoughts and feelings toward cervical cancer screening.32 The mean score was used to categorize the respondents into positive vs negative attitudes.33The independent variables included social demographic characteristics and information on HIV. Social‐demographic variables included age in years, date of birth, number of children, the highest level of education (no education, primary, secondary, and higher education), marital status (single/ never married, married/cohabiting, divorced/separated/widowed, specify if others), occupation (no occupation, employed, housewife, peasant/farmer), an average woman's monthly income, and average household's monthly income (in Tanzanian Shillings). Information on HIV included the date of HIV diagnosis, the number of years since HIV diagnosis, WHO clinical stages of HIV (stage 1, stage 2, stage 3, stage 4, and not known), and the most recent CD4 count in cell/mm3 and if she is current on treatment.Data analysisData cleaning and analysis were performed using SPSS version 20.0. Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize categorical variables and means/medians and standard deviations/interquartile range for numeric variables. The findings were summarized into tables, graphs, and narrations.RESULTSParticipant background characteristicsA total of 303 women living with HIV met the inclusion criteria and were invited to participate in the study. Only 297 of those invited consented to participate in making a response rate of 98%. The median age of 297 women living with HIV who participated in this study was 44 (IQR 36‐49.5) years. About half (49.2%) of the women were 45 years of age or above. More than half (58.2%) were widowed/divorced or separated, and 60.6% were self‐employed. About 89.2% of the women reported having no health insurance, and only 5.1% reported a history of cervical cancer in their families (Table 1).1TABLEParticipant background characteristics (N = 297)VariablesFrequencyPercentageAge (years)<356821.235‐448829.6≥4514649.2Median (IQR)44.0(36.0, 49.5)aMarital statusSingle3812.8Married/cohabiting8629Widowed/divorced/separated17358.2Highest education levelNo education124.0Primary education21773.1Secondary education and above6822.9OccupationEmployed20067.3Peasant7224.2Unemployed258.4Have health insuranceYes3210.8No26589.2Has a family history of cervical cancerYes155.1No28294.9Own any information technology deviceYes28094.3No175.7aInterquartile range.Cervical cancer screening practicesHalf of all women living with HIV in this study reported having ever screened for cervical cancer. Of these, 64% were screened within the past 12 months, and 93.3% had their screening post‐HIV diagnosis. Advice from the healthcare providers was the commonly reported reason (88.6%) for cervical cancer screening in this population. Among the reasons for not being screened included having no symptoms (53.4%), unaware of where to be screened (25%), delay in obtaining service (14.5%), and fear of pain (11.5%). Less than half (48.2%) of those who ever screened reported the screening interval every once a year as per the national cervical cancer screening guidelines (Table 2).2TABLECervical cancer screening practices (N = 297)VariablesFrequencyPercentageEver been screened for cervical cancerYes14950.2No14849.8Had cervical screening in the last 12 mo (n = 149)aYes9664.4No5335.5Reasons for screening (n = 149)a,bHIV status3422.8Advice from health care providers13288.6Support from husband/sexual partner10.7Age21.3Screening campaigns2818.8Reasons for not screening (n = 148)a,bDelay in obtaining service2214.9No symptoms7953.4Fear of results138.8Fear of pain1711.5Do not know the place3725.0Expensive128.1Othersc3322.3Frequency of cervical cancer screening after HIV diagnosis (n = 149)aEvery 6 mo96.5Every once year6748.2Less than once a year3122.3I do not know3223.0aVariables with missing values.bPercent exceeds 100 because of multiple responses.cBeing busy and not aware of it.Participants knowledge of cervical cancer screeningThe vast majority (89.6%) of women living with HIV in this study had ever heard of cervical cancer screening. Only a fifth (20.5%) of the participants were aware of how women living with HIV should start cervical cancer screening. About three quarters (72.1%) of the women had inadequate knowledge of cervical cancer signs and symptoms. Moreover, almost half (52.5%) had adequate knowledge of preventing cervical cancer (Table 3).3TABLEKnowledge of cervical cancer screening (N = 297)VariablesFrequencyPercentageEver heard about cervical cancer screeningYes26689.6No3110.4Awareness of the presence of a national cervical cancer screening program in TanzaniaYes17157.6No12642.4Awareness on the age at which women in the general population are supposed to start cervical cancer screening (n = 171)aYes169.4No15590.6Awareness on the timing at which women living with HIV should start cervical cancer screeningYes6120.5No23679.5Knowledge of signs and symptoms of cervical cancerAdequate8327.9Inadequate21472.1Knowledge of prevention of cervical cancerAdequate15652.5Inadequate14147.5Knowledge of risk factors of cervical cancerAdequate11438.4Inadequate18361.6aVariables containing missing values.Of the 297 women living with HIV in this study, 80.1% received information on cervical cancer screening from the health care providers and only 8.1% from print media (8.1%) (Figure 1).1FIGUREParticipant's source of information on cervical cancer screening (N = 297). Percentage exceed 100 because of multiple responsesAttitude toward cervical cancer screeningThe majority (88.9%) of the women living with HIV in this study saw the need for cervical cancer screening, and over three‐quarters (78.5%) were willing to be screened without having signs and symptoms. About two‐thirds (66.7%) of the women had a positive attitude toward cervical cancer screening, and 71.4% were comfortable to be screened by any health care provider regardless of their gender (Table 4).4TABLEAttitude on cervical cancer screening (N = 297)VariablesFrequencyPercentageSeeing the need for cervical cancer screeningYes26488.9No3311.1The willingness of being screenedYes24582.5No5217.5Willingness to be screened for cervical cancer without having any sign or symptom of cervical cancerYes23378.5No6421.5Fearing cervical cancer screening procedureYes4515.2No25284.8Feeling shy to expose private parts during the procedure to young or male service providerYes6020.2No23779.8Fear pain/discomfort during the cervical cancer screening procedureYes8428.3No21371.7Fear of bleeding during and after cervical cancer screening procedureYes6923.2No22876.8Fear of being diagnosed with cervical cancer after undergoing screeningYes6321.2No23478.8Think cervical cancer screening is expensiveYes4916.5No24883.5Preferred gender of provider for cervical cancer screeningMale/female health care provider8528.6Comfortable with any of them21271.4Attitude toward cervical cancer screeningPositive19866.7Negative9933.3DISCUSSIONWe aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices on cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in the Kilimanjaro region. This study shows that the self‐reported prevalence of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV was 50.2%. The majority (89%) of the women had ever heard about cervical cancer screening. Still, less than half of them had adequate knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors (38.4%), sign and symptoms (27.9%), and prevention (52.5%). Moreover, only 20.5% were aware of the right time to start cervical cancer screening after HIV diagnosis. On the other hand, more than 60 % (66.7%) of all women had positive attitudes toward cervical cancer screening.The self‐reported prevalence of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in this study is significantly higher than 9% among women living with HIV in Dar Es Salaam26 and other studies in SSA.19,31,34‐36 A higher prevalence in this study might be explained by recent efforts to increase screening uptake and the integration of cervical cancer screening programs and care and treatment (CTC) services in 2017.25 This study's estimate is lower than that of those from high‐income countries.37‐39 This difference can be due to delayed integration of cervical cancer screening programs with CTC services in Tanzania compared to high resourced countries.31Advice from health care providers was the main reason for cervical cancer screening among women in this study, as reported in other studies.40,41 On the other hand, about half (53.4%) of the women who have never screened reported having no symptoms and not knowing the place to go for screening, similar to findings in Ethiopia42 and Uganda,19 respectively. This implies that there is low coverage of health education programs, particularly on cervical cancer, in this population. The low cervical cancer screening among women attending CTC reflects missed opportunities. This shows a need to strengthen and encourage health care workers to create awareness and counselling services for women attending CTC.Like Western Kenya,3 most participants in this study ever heard about cervical cancer screening. These findings are higher than those from other studies,36,42 where nearly a third of the women ever heard of cervical cancer screening. This study's heightened awareness is probably due to mass awareness creation programs through media and the integration of cervical cancer screening programs with CTC services25 similar to Kenya.3 This shows a need for different countries to strengthen awareness and screening campaigns that may increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening interventions among women attending CTC and across the general population.In this study, a fifth (20.5%) of participants were aware that cervical cancer screening should be initiated soon after HIV diagnosis, as reported in Ethiopia.42 Furthermore, most women in this study had inadequate knowledge of the risk factors, signs and symptoms, and cervical cancer prevention. Much lower proportions of inadequate knowledge were reported in Ethiopia22,42 and the USA.43 This could have been among the reasons for the high screening uptake. The lower screening uptake in Ethiopia despite high proportions of adequate knowledge may also be due to inadequate health care provider cervical counselling on cancer screening.Health care workers and mass media (radio and television) were the primary sources of information concerning cervical cancer screening, similar to Dar es salaam.26 However, this was so to only a fifth (20%) in Nigeria.33 A higher percentage of participants who received information from health care workers in Tanzania can also be due to the integration of cervical cancer screening programs and CTC service delivery. In Nigeria, cervical cancer information has not been incorporated into the HIV test and counselling services. Other sources of information in Nigeria included family members, relatives, and friends. This calls for strengthening the health care workers in CTCs and enhancing mass media education campaigns across the country to increase awareness and uptake of cervical cancer screening.About two‐thirds of women living with HIV in this study had a positive attitude toward cervical cancer screening, which is significantly higher than 20.8% reported in Dar Es Salaam.26 The difference may be because Koneru et al26 conducted the study before integrating cervical cancer screening with HIV services at CTC in 2017.25 Furthermore, this study's estimate is higher than 43.5% reported in Nigeria but less than 87% in Ethiopia.33,42 The noninclusion of cervical cancer information can explain Nigeria's poor attitude following the post‐HIV test counselling. The high proportion of positive attitudes reported in Ethiopia may be due to the integration of screening services in HIV management. Efforts should be made to eliminate potentially negative attitudes toward cervical cancer screening.Strength and limitationsThis study provides essential information about knowledge, attitudes, and cervical cancer screening practices among WLHIV after integrating cervical cancer screening with care and treatment services in Tanzania. This study has some limitations that might have affected our observed findings. Firstly, the study was hospital‐based and involved only women attending selected CTC in the Kilimanjaro region; hence, it may not represent the whole Tanzanian population. Self‐reported knowledge, attitude, and cervical cancer screening practices by study participants may be subject to reporting bias or self‐desirability bias.CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONSThis study found that women living with HIV in this study had inadequate knowledge and favorable attitudes toward cervical cancer screening. Half of all women attending CTC in the Kilimanjaro region have ever been screened for cervical cancer, which is slightly higher than previous studies before integrating cervical cancer screening with CTC services in Tanzania and other countries SSA. Strengthening healthcare workers' capacity to promote cervical cancer awareness and adherence to screening recommendations in this population is essential to increase uptake. Furthermore, through the Ministry of Health, the government should enhance educational campaigns through different mass media such as radios, create more awareness, address potentially negative attitudes toward screening, and promote cervical cancer screening uptake among WLHIV.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTWe acknowledge the regional medical officer of the Kilimanjaro Region for permission to carry out this study. We also appreciate the support from the CTC health care providers in Mawenzi regional hospital and Hai district hospital during the data collection process. We dearly appreciate the study participants whose consent and participation enabled the availability of data used in this study.CONFLICT OF INTERESTThe authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSAll authors had full access to the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Conceptualization, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M., C.A.; Data Curation, M.M., F.K., H.K.; Formal Analysis, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M.; Investigation, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M.; Methodology, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M., C.A.; Project Administration, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M., C.A.; Validation, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M., C.A.; Visualization, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M.; Supervision, I.M., C.A.; Writing‐Original Draft, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M.; Writing‐Review & Editing, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M., C.A.DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENTThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.ETHICAL STATEMENTThe study was approved by the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College Research and Ethics Review Committee (KCMU‐CRERC) and received an approval number UG 090/2020. Oral informed consent was obtained from participants before participation in the study. Participation in this study was voluntary and did not affect the patient's routine CTC cervices. Participants were allowed to refuse to answer any questions and terminate the interview when they desired. Confidentiality of information was ensured by using unique identifiers.REFERENCESBray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394‐424.WHO. Cervical cancer [Internet]. World Health Organization. Available from https://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/cervical-cancer/en/. Accessed December 17, 2019. 2020 [cited 2019 Dec 17]. Available from https://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/cervical-cancer/en/Rosser JI, Njoroge B, Huchko MJ. Cervical cancer screening knowledge and behavior among women attending an urban HIV Clinic in Western Kenya. J Cancer Educ. 2015;30(3):567‐572.Plotkin M, Besana GVR, Yuma S, et al. Integrating HIV testing into cervical cancer screening in Tanzania: an analysis of routine service delivery statistics. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14(1):120.Huchko MJ, Bukusi EA, Cohen CR. Building capacity for cervical cancer screening in outpatient HIV clinics in the Nyanza province of western Kenya. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;114(2):106‐110.Mungo C, Cohen CR, Maloba M, Bukusi EA, Huchko MJ. Prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of HIV‐positive women diagnosed with invasive cancer of the cervix in Kenya. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2013;123(3):231‐235.Horo A, Jaquet A, Ekouevi D, et al. Cervical cancer screening by visual inspection in cote d'Ivoire, operational and clinical aspects according to HIV status. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):237.Ononogbu U, Almujtaba M, Modibbo F, et al. Cervical cancer risk factors among HIV‐infected Nigerian women. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):582.Kafuruki L, Rambau PF, Massinde A, Masalu N. Prevalence and predictors of cervical intraepithelial Neoplasia among HIV infected women at Bugando medical Centre, Mwanza‐Tanzania. Infect Agent Cancer. 2013;8(1):45.Chambuso RS, Shadrack S, Lidenge SJ, Mwakibete N, Medeiros RM. Influence of HIV/AIDS on cervical cancer: a retrospective study from Tanzania. J Glob Oncol. 2017;3(1):72‐78.Mokhele I, Evans D, Schnippel K, Swarts A, Smith JS, Firnhaber C. Awareness, perceived risk and practices related to cervical cancer and pap smear screening: a cross‐sectional study among HIV‐positive women attending an urban HIV clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2016;106(12):1247‐1253.Vaccarella S, Lortet‐Tieulent J, Plummer M, Franceschi S, Bray F. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(15):3262‐3273.Liu G, Sharma M, Tan N, Barnabas RV. HIV‐positive women have higher risk of human papilloma virus infection, precancerous lesions, and cervical cancer. AIDS. 2018;32(6):795‐808.Anderson J, Wysong M, Estep D, et al. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in Côte d'Ivoire, Guyana, and Tanzania: effect of HIV status. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0139242.Ghebre RG, Grover S, Xu MJ, Chuang LT, Simonds H. Cervical cancer control in HIV‐infected women: past, present and future. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017;21:101‐108.Mapanga W, Girdler‐Brown B, Feresu SA, Chipato T, Singh E. Prevention of cervical cancer in HIV‐seropositive women from developing countries through cervical cancer screening: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):198.Lyimo FS, Beran TN. Demographic, knowledge, attitudinal, and accessibility factors associated with uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in a rural district of Tanzania: three public policy implications. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):22.Matenge TG, Mash B. Barriers to accessing cervical cancer screening among HIV positive women in Kgatleng district, Botswana: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205425.Wanyenze RK, Bwanika JB, Beyeza‐Kashesya J, Mugerwa S, Arinaitwe J, Matovu JK. Uptake and correlates of cervical cancer screening among HIV‐infected women attending HIV care in Uganda. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1380361.Ebu NI, Ogah JK. Predictors of cervical cancer screening intention of HIV‐positive women in the central region of Ghana. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):43.McFarland DM, Gueldner SM, Mogobe KD. Integrated review of barriers to cervical cancer screening in sub‐Saharan Africa. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016;48(5):490‐498.Assefa AA, Astawesegn FH, Eshetu B. Cervical cancer screening service utilization and associated factors among HIV positive women attending adult ART clinic in public health facilities, Hawassa town, Ethiopia: a cross‐sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):847.Bukirwa A, Mutyoba JN, Mukasa BN, et al. Motivations and barriers to cervical cancer screening among HIV infected women in HIV care: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15(1):82.WHO. Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A Guide to Essential Practice. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2014:408.MoHCDGEC. National guidelines for the management of HIV and AIDS. HIV Prevention. 6th ed. Dar es Salaam: MoHCDGEC; 2017:67‐68.Koneru A, Jolly PE, Blakemore S, et al. Acceptance of peer navigators to reduce barriers to cervical cancer screening and treatment among women with HIV infection in Tanzania. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;138(1):53‐61.MoHCDGEC. HIV Care and Treatment Centres [Internet]. Basic Statistics Tanzania. Available from http://health.opendata.go.tz/dataset/hiv-care-and-treatment-centres. Accessed May 24, 2020. 2020 [cited May 24, 2020]. Available from http://health.opendata.go.tz/dataset/hiv-care-and-treatment-centresMkenda TB, Nokoe KS, Karoki S. Statistical update on the implementation of HIV/AIDS guidelines and policies in Kilimanjaro region‐Tanzania. Heal Sci J. 2019;13(2):640.THIS. Tanzania HIV Impact Survey 2016–2017 Final Report. Tanzania Commission for AIDS, Zanzibar AIDS Commission. Dar es Salaam, The United Republic of Tanzania; 2018.NACP. The United Republic of Tanzania, National Accelerated Action Plan on HIV Testing Services 2019–2020. National Aids Control Program. MoHCDGEC [Internet]. Dodoma, The United Republic of Tanzania; 2018. Available from www.nacp.go.tzNega AD, Woldetsadik MA, Gelagay AA. Low uptake of cervical cancer screening among HIV positive women in Gondar University referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: cross‐sectional study design. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):87.Jassim G, Obeid A, Al Nasheet HA. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cervical cancer and screening among women visiting primary health care Centres in Bahrain. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):128.Adibe MO, Aluh DO. Awareness, knowledge, and attitudes towards cervical cancer amongst HIV‐positive women receiving Care in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(6):1189‐1194.Batra P, Kuhn L, Denny L. Utilisation and outcomes of cervical cancer prevention services among HIV‐infected women in Cape Town. South African Med J. 2010;100(1):39‐44.Lukorito J, Wanyoro A, Kimani H. Uptake of cervical cancer screening among HIV positive women in comprehensive care Centres in Nairobi, Kenya. Res Obstet Gynecol. 2017;5(1):1‐6.Ezechi OC, Gab‐Okafor CV, Ostergren PO, Odberg PK. Willingness and acceptability of cervical cancer screening among HIV positive Nigerian women. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):46.Cross SL, Suharwardy SH, Bodavula P, et al. Improving cervical cancer screening rates in an urban HIV clinic. AIDS Care. 2014;26(9):1186‐1193.Dal Maso L, Franceschi S, Lise M, et al. Self‐reported history of pap‐smear in HIV‐positive women in northern Italy: a cross‐sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:310.Stuardo V. Low prevalence of cervical cancer screening among HIV‐positive women in Catalonia (Spain). J AIDS Clin Res. 2013;1(S3):004.Makuvire T, Butler LM, ‘the Ngubane S, Andrew D, Katz IT. Experiences, beliefs, and attitudes about cervical cancer screening among women in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu‐Natal, in South Africa: A qualitative study; 2018; Havard Medical School.Williams M, Moneyham L, Kempf MC, Chamot E, Scarinci I. Structural and sociocultural factors associated with cervical cancer screening among HIV‐infected African American women in Alabama. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29(1):13‐19.Shiferaw S, Addissie A, Gizaw M, et al. Knowledge about cervical cancer and barriers toward cervical cancer screening among HIV‐positive women attending public health centers in Addis Ababa city. Ethiopia Cancer Med. 2018;7(3):903‐912.Ogunwale AN, Coleman MA, Sangi‐Haghpeykar H, et al. Assessment of factors impacting cervical cancer screening among low‐income women living with HIV‐AIDS. AIDS Care. 2016;28(4):491‐494. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Cancer Reports Wiley

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in the Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania

Download PDF
8 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/knowledge-attitude-and-practice-of-cervical-cancer-screening-among-jftjWKnnzh

References (87)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
eISSN
2573-8348
DOI
10.1002/cnr2.1374
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONCervical cancer is a public health concern being the fourth most common cancer among women in incidence and mortality,1,2 with 570 000 new cases in 2018 representing 6.6% of all female cancers worldwide.2,3 Approximately 90% of all new cervical cancer cases occur in low‐ and middle‐income countries and is also the second most common cancer among women in sub‐Saharan Africa.1,2 In 2018, 26 009 women were living with cervical cancer in East Africa, which accounted for 26.2% of all cancer cases among women in the region, Tanzania accounting for 39% of all cases.1 The prevalence of cervical cancer among women living with HIV is high and more alarming in sub‐Saharan Africa. Prevalence is estimated to range between 1.3% in Kenya and 6% in Nigeria.4‐8 Within Tanzania, the prevalence ranges from 7.3% in Mwanza to 11% in Morogoro,9,10 higher than that reported in Nigeria. Poor screening practices may partly contribute to the high prevalence of cervical cancer among WLHIV in Tanzania.Virtually, all cervical cancer cases (99%) are associated with genital infection with high‐risk human papillomavirus (HPV)—a widespread virus transmitted through sexual contact.2,11‐13 WLHIV have a higher risk of developing the disease, mainly due to their immune‐compromised state.1,9,10,14‐16 Knowledge and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening are crucial in determining the screening intervention's uptake among women.17‐20 The belief of not being susceptible to cervical cancer, fear of cancer diagnosis, fear of exposing their (women's) private parts, anticipated pain of the testing procedure, a long distance from home to the clinic, poor access to screening results, long waiting time, and fewer healthcare workers are other barriers to cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV.18,21‐23Despite the heavy burden of the disease, cervical cancer is a highly preventable disease in women, including those living with HIV.19,24 WHO introduced comprehensive cervical cancer prevention in 2014, which comprises cervical cancer screening, targeting women who are at higher risk of developing the disease.24 With the introduction of mass HPV vaccination for young girls in some developing countries, there are opportunities to offer the vaccine to HIV‐positive middle‐aged women through the existing HIV care and treatment programs.16 In Tanzania, cervical cancer screening has been integrated into HIV care and treatment services where screening is initiated soon after HIV diagnosis without regarding the woman's age and is conducted annually.25Despite that, the proportion of HIV‐positive women screened for cervical cancer in CTC is low. In Dar Es Salaam, only 9% of women living with HIV ever had at least one cervical cancer screening test.26 However, this study was conducted before the integration of cervical cancer screening in routine HIV care. Since this integration, little has been done to assess the uptake of cervical cancer screening services among women living with HIV in Tanzania. This study aimed to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and cervical cancer screening practices among WLHIV in the Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania, following the integration of these services in CTC services. Findings from this study will provide information to assess the efficacy of this program and inform future interventions. These findings may also assist the healthcare providers, particularly at CTC, in promoting the uptake of cervical cancer screening services among WLHIV. Moreover, the study results may contribute to developing policies, guidelines, and strategic decisions that will enhance the current screening practices in this population.MATERIALS AND METHODSStudy design, setting, and populationWe conducted a health facility‐based cross‐sectional study in the Kilimanjaro region between 21 August and 3 September 2020. The region has 396 health facilities that are 20 hospitals, 41 health centers, and 335 dispensaries. Out of these health facilities, 52 provide care and treatment (CTC) services.27,28 CTC is the gateway where people living with HIV can access HIV care, treatment, and support services.25 The prevalence of HIV in the Kilimanjaro region was 2.6% and was high (3.1%) among women aged 15 years and above.29,30 The study population was all WLHIV in the Kilimanjaro region and were attending CTC at data collection time. The study included all women aged 18 to 55 years who provided informed consent. In Tanzania, WLHIV are supposed to be screened for cervical cancer immediately after HIV diagnosis.25 The study excluded severely ill women and had undergone total hysterectomy because severely ill women could not respond to the questions. The women with total hysterectomy had their cervix surgically removed.Sample size and samplingThe sample size was calculated using the formula for estimating a single proportion, given as (N = [Za/2]2 × p[1−p]/e2), where N is the desired sample size, and p is the estimated prevalence of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV, assumed to be 20%. Furthermore, e is the margin of error or precision (5%), and Z is the standard normal value (1.96) corresponding to a 95% confidence interval. After adding a 10% proportion of nonresponse, the minimum estimated sample size was 271 participants.A simple random sampling technique was used to select Hai among the rural districts of the Kilimanjaro region. Moshi municipality was purposefully selected to ensure rural–urban representativeness. One CTC in each district with the highest number of women enrolled was selected (Hai district hospital and Mawenzi regional referral hospital). All women who attended the CTCs were selected for inclusion. Sampling was done proportional to the size of each selected CTC.Data collection methodsFace‐to‐face interviews were used for data collection using an electronic administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was adapted and modified from previous studies.31,32 The questionnaire was in both English and Swahili languages. It contained information on participant social‐demographic characteristics, knowledge, and attitudes on cervical cancer screening, cervical cancer screening practices, and HIV care and treatment. Trained doctor of medicine students collected data. The interviews were administered in Swahili (local) language and were conducted in a quiet place around the CTC clinics after obtaining informed consent. Each interview took about 20 to 30 minutes.Study variablesThe primary outcome was cervical cancer screening practice measured by asking women if they had ever screened for cervical cancer or not, the reason for screening, the timing of screening since diagnosed with HIV, and whether they had ever screened in the past 12 months.Knowledge and attitudes on cervical cancer screening were secondary outcomes. Knowledge of cervical cancer was measured by asking participants if they ever heard cervical cancer and knowledge of causes, signs, risk factors, and prevention. Knowledge of causes was measured using five‐item questions, the signs using 11 items, risk factors using 12 items, and prevention using 5 items. Each of these items carried one point when answered correctly and zero points when wrongly answered. Final scores were categorized into good knowledge (≥50% of the scores) and poor if otherwise.13 Attitude on cervical cancer screening was measured by asking the participant 10 questions concerning thoughts and feelings toward cervical cancer screening.32 The mean score was used to categorize the respondents into positive vs negative attitudes.33The independent variables included social demographic characteristics and information on HIV. Social‐demographic variables included age in years, date of birth, number of children, the highest level of education (no education, primary, secondary, and higher education), marital status (single/ never married, married/cohabiting, divorced/separated/widowed, specify if others), occupation (no occupation, employed, housewife, peasant/farmer), an average woman's monthly income, and average household's monthly income (in Tanzanian Shillings). Information on HIV included the date of HIV diagnosis, the number of years since HIV diagnosis, WHO clinical stages of HIV (stage 1, stage 2, stage 3, stage 4, and not known), and the most recent CD4 count in cell/mm3 and if she is current on treatment.Data analysisData cleaning and analysis were performed using SPSS version 20.0. Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize categorical variables and means/medians and standard deviations/interquartile range for numeric variables. The findings were summarized into tables, graphs, and narrations.RESULTSParticipant background characteristicsA total of 303 women living with HIV met the inclusion criteria and were invited to participate in the study. Only 297 of those invited consented to participate in making a response rate of 98%. The median age of 297 women living with HIV who participated in this study was 44 (IQR 36‐49.5) years. About half (49.2%) of the women were 45 years of age or above. More than half (58.2%) were widowed/divorced or separated, and 60.6% were self‐employed. About 89.2% of the women reported having no health insurance, and only 5.1% reported a history of cervical cancer in their families (Table 1).1TABLEParticipant background characteristics (N = 297)VariablesFrequencyPercentageAge (years)<356821.235‐448829.6≥4514649.2Median (IQR)44.0(36.0, 49.5)aMarital statusSingle3812.8Married/cohabiting8629Widowed/divorced/separated17358.2Highest education levelNo education124.0Primary education21773.1Secondary education and above6822.9OccupationEmployed20067.3Peasant7224.2Unemployed258.4Have health insuranceYes3210.8No26589.2Has a family history of cervical cancerYes155.1No28294.9Own any information technology deviceYes28094.3No175.7aInterquartile range.Cervical cancer screening practicesHalf of all women living with HIV in this study reported having ever screened for cervical cancer. Of these, 64% were screened within the past 12 months, and 93.3% had their screening post‐HIV diagnosis. Advice from the healthcare providers was the commonly reported reason (88.6%) for cervical cancer screening in this population. Among the reasons for not being screened included having no symptoms (53.4%), unaware of where to be screened (25%), delay in obtaining service (14.5%), and fear of pain (11.5%). Less than half (48.2%) of those who ever screened reported the screening interval every once a year as per the national cervical cancer screening guidelines (Table 2).2TABLECervical cancer screening practices (N = 297)VariablesFrequencyPercentageEver been screened for cervical cancerYes14950.2No14849.8Had cervical screening in the last 12 mo (n = 149)aYes9664.4No5335.5Reasons for screening (n = 149)a,bHIV status3422.8Advice from health care providers13288.6Support from husband/sexual partner10.7Age21.3Screening campaigns2818.8Reasons for not screening (n = 148)a,bDelay in obtaining service2214.9No symptoms7953.4Fear of results138.8Fear of pain1711.5Do not know the place3725.0Expensive128.1Othersc3322.3Frequency of cervical cancer screening after HIV diagnosis (n = 149)aEvery 6 mo96.5Every once year6748.2Less than once a year3122.3I do not know3223.0aVariables with missing values.bPercent exceeds 100 because of multiple responses.cBeing busy and not aware of it.Participants knowledge of cervical cancer screeningThe vast majority (89.6%) of women living with HIV in this study had ever heard of cervical cancer screening. Only a fifth (20.5%) of the participants were aware of how women living with HIV should start cervical cancer screening. About three quarters (72.1%) of the women had inadequate knowledge of cervical cancer signs and symptoms. Moreover, almost half (52.5%) had adequate knowledge of preventing cervical cancer (Table 3).3TABLEKnowledge of cervical cancer screening (N = 297)VariablesFrequencyPercentageEver heard about cervical cancer screeningYes26689.6No3110.4Awareness of the presence of a national cervical cancer screening program in TanzaniaYes17157.6No12642.4Awareness on the age at which women in the general population are supposed to start cervical cancer screening (n = 171)aYes169.4No15590.6Awareness on the timing at which women living with HIV should start cervical cancer screeningYes6120.5No23679.5Knowledge of signs and symptoms of cervical cancerAdequate8327.9Inadequate21472.1Knowledge of prevention of cervical cancerAdequate15652.5Inadequate14147.5Knowledge of risk factors of cervical cancerAdequate11438.4Inadequate18361.6aVariables containing missing values.Of the 297 women living with HIV in this study, 80.1% received information on cervical cancer screening from the health care providers and only 8.1% from print media (8.1%) (Figure 1).1FIGUREParticipant's source of information on cervical cancer screening (N = 297). Percentage exceed 100 because of multiple responsesAttitude toward cervical cancer screeningThe majority (88.9%) of the women living with HIV in this study saw the need for cervical cancer screening, and over three‐quarters (78.5%) were willing to be screened without having signs and symptoms. About two‐thirds (66.7%) of the women had a positive attitude toward cervical cancer screening, and 71.4% were comfortable to be screened by any health care provider regardless of their gender (Table 4).4TABLEAttitude on cervical cancer screening (N = 297)VariablesFrequencyPercentageSeeing the need for cervical cancer screeningYes26488.9No3311.1The willingness of being screenedYes24582.5No5217.5Willingness to be screened for cervical cancer without having any sign or symptom of cervical cancerYes23378.5No6421.5Fearing cervical cancer screening procedureYes4515.2No25284.8Feeling shy to expose private parts during the procedure to young or male service providerYes6020.2No23779.8Fear pain/discomfort during the cervical cancer screening procedureYes8428.3No21371.7Fear of bleeding during and after cervical cancer screening procedureYes6923.2No22876.8Fear of being diagnosed with cervical cancer after undergoing screeningYes6321.2No23478.8Think cervical cancer screening is expensiveYes4916.5No24883.5Preferred gender of provider for cervical cancer screeningMale/female health care provider8528.6Comfortable with any of them21271.4Attitude toward cervical cancer screeningPositive19866.7Negative9933.3DISCUSSIONWe aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices on cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in the Kilimanjaro region. This study shows that the self‐reported prevalence of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV was 50.2%. The majority (89%) of the women had ever heard about cervical cancer screening. Still, less than half of them had adequate knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors (38.4%), sign and symptoms (27.9%), and prevention (52.5%). Moreover, only 20.5% were aware of the right time to start cervical cancer screening after HIV diagnosis. On the other hand, more than 60 % (66.7%) of all women had positive attitudes toward cervical cancer screening.The self‐reported prevalence of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in this study is significantly higher than 9% among women living with HIV in Dar Es Salaam26 and other studies in SSA.19,31,34‐36 A higher prevalence in this study might be explained by recent efforts to increase screening uptake and the integration of cervical cancer screening programs and care and treatment (CTC) services in 2017.25 This study's estimate is lower than that of those from high‐income countries.37‐39 This difference can be due to delayed integration of cervical cancer screening programs with CTC services in Tanzania compared to high resourced countries.31Advice from health care providers was the main reason for cervical cancer screening among women in this study, as reported in other studies.40,41 On the other hand, about half (53.4%) of the women who have never screened reported having no symptoms and not knowing the place to go for screening, similar to findings in Ethiopia42 and Uganda,19 respectively. This implies that there is low coverage of health education programs, particularly on cervical cancer, in this population. The low cervical cancer screening among women attending CTC reflects missed opportunities. This shows a need to strengthen and encourage health care workers to create awareness and counselling services for women attending CTC.Like Western Kenya,3 most participants in this study ever heard about cervical cancer screening. These findings are higher than those from other studies,36,42 where nearly a third of the women ever heard of cervical cancer screening. This study's heightened awareness is probably due to mass awareness creation programs through media and the integration of cervical cancer screening programs with CTC services25 similar to Kenya.3 This shows a need for different countries to strengthen awareness and screening campaigns that may increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening interventions among women attending CTC and across the general population.In this study, a fifth (20.5%) of participants were aware that cervical cancer screening should be initiated soon after HIV diagnosis, as reported in Ethiopia.42 Furthermore, most women in this study had inadequate knowledge of the risk factors, signs and symptoms, and cervical cancer prevention. Much lower proportions of inadequate knowledge were reported in Ethiopia22,42 and the USA.43 This could have been among the reasons for the high screening uptake. The lower screening uptake in Ethiopia despite high proportions of adequate knowledge may also be due to inadequate health care provider cervical counselling on cancer screening.Health care workers and mass media (radio and television) were the primary sources of information concerning cervical cancer screening, similar to Dar es salaam.26 However, this was so to only a fifth (20%) in Nigeria.33 A higher percentage of participants who received information from health care workers in Tanzania can also be due to the integration of cervical cancer screening programs and CTC service delivery. In Nigeria, cervical cancer information has not been incorporated into the HIV test and counselling services. Other sources of information in Nigeria included family members, relatives, and friends. This calls for strengthening the health care workers in CTCs and enhancing mass media education campaigns across the country to increase awareness and uptake of cervical cancer screening.About two‐thirds of women living with HIV in this study had a positive attitude toward cervical cancer screening, which is significantly higher than 20.8% reported in Dar Es Salaam.26 The difference may be because Koneru et al26 conducted the study before integrating cervical cancer screening with HIV services at CTC in 2017.25 Furthermore, this study's estimate is higher than 43.5% reported in Nigeria but less than 87% in Ethiopia.33,42 The noninclusion of cervical cancer information can explain Nigeria's poor attitude following the post‐HIV test counselling. The high proportion of positive attitudes reported in Ethiopia may be due to the integration of screening services in HIV management. Efforts should be made to eliminate potentially negative attitudes toward cervical cancer screening.Strength and limitationsThis study provides essential information about knowledge, attitudes, and cervical cancer screening practices among WLHIV after integrating cervical cancer screening with care and treatment services in Tanzania. This study has some limitations that might have affected our observed findings. Firstly, the study was hospital‐based and involved only women attending selected CTC in the Kilimanjaro region; hence, it may not represent the whole Tanzanian population. Self‐reported knowledge, attitude, and cervical cancer screening practices by study participants may be subject to reporting bias or self‐desirability bias.CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONSThis study found that women living with HIV in this study had inadequate knowledge and favorable attitudes toward cervical cancer screening. Half of all women attending CTC in the Kilimanjaro region have ever been screened for cervical cancer, which is slightly higher than previous studies before integrating cervical cancer screening with CTC services in Tanzania and other countries SSA. Strengthening healthcare workers' capacity to promote cervical cancer awareness and adherence to screening recommendations in this population is essential to increase uptake. Furthermore, through the Ministry of Health, the government should enhance educational campaigns through different mass media such as radios, create more awareness, address potentially negative attitudes toward screening, and promote cervical cancer screening uptake among WLHIV.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTWe acknowledge the regional medical officer of the Kilimanjaro Region for permission to carry out this study. We also appreciate the support from the CTC health care providers in Mawenzi regional hospital and Hai district hospital during the data collection process. We dearly appreciate the study participants whose consent and participation enabled the availability of data used in this study.CONFLICT OF INTERESTThe authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSAll authors had full access to the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Conceptualization, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M., C.A.; Data Curation, M.M., F.K., H.K.; Formal Analysis, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M.; Investigation, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M.; Methodology, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M., C.A.; Project Administration, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M., C.A.; Validation, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M., C.A.; Visualization, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M.; Supervision, I.M., C.A.; Writing‐Original Draft, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M.; Writing‐Review & Editing, M.M., F.K., H.K., I.M., C.A.DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENTThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.ETHICAL STATEMENTThe study was approved by the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College Research and Ethics Review Committee (KCMU‐CRERC) and received an approval number UG 090/2020. Oral informed consent was obtained from participants before participation in the study. Participation in this study was voluntary and did not affect the patient's routine CTC cervices. Participants were allowed to refuse to answer any questions and terminate the interview when they desired. Confidentiality of information was ensured by using unique identifiers.REFERENCESBray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394‐424.WHO. Cervical cancer [Internet]. World Health Organization. Available from https://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/cervical-cancer/en/. Accessed December 17, 2019. 2020 [cited 2019 Dec 17]. Available from https://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/cervical-cancer/en/Rosser JI, Njoroge B, Huchko MJ. Cervical cancer screening knowledge and behavior among women attending an urban HIV Clinic in Western Kenya. J Cancer Educ. 2015;30(3):567‐572.Plotkin M, Besana GVR, Yuma S, et al. Integrating HIV testing into cervical cancer screening in Tanzania: an analysis of routine service delivery statistics. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14(1):120.Huchko MJ, Bukusi EA, Cohen CR. Building capacity for cervical cancer screening in outpatient HIV clinics in the Nyanza province of western Kenya. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;114(2):106‐110.Mungo C, Cohen CR, Maloba M, Bukusi EA, Huchko MJ. Prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of HIV‐positive women diagnosed with invasive cancer of the cervix in Kenya. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2013;123(3):231‐235.Horo A, Jaquet A, Ekouevi D, et al. Cervical cancer screening by visual inspection in cote d'Ivoire, operational and clinical aspects according to HIV status. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):237.Ononogbu U, Almujtaba M, Modibbo F, et al. Cervical cancer risk factors among HIV‐infected Nigerian women. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):582.Kafuruki L, Rambau PF, Massinde A, Masalu N. Prevalence and predictors of cervical intraepithelial Neoplasia among HIV infected women at Bugando medical Centre, Mwanza‐Tanzania. Infect Agent Cancer. 2013;8(1):45.Chambuso RS, Shadrack S, Lidenge SJ, Mwakibete N, Medeiros RM. Influence of HIV/AIDS on cervical cancer: a retrospective study from Tanzania. J Glob Oncol. 2017;3(1):72‐78.Mokhele I, Evans D, Schnippel K, Swarts A, Smith JS, Firnhaber C. Awareness, perceived risk and practices related to cervical cancer and pap smear screening: a cross‐sectional study among HIV‐positive women attending an urban HIV clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2016;106(12):1247‐1253.Vaccarella S, Lortet‐Tieulent J, Plummer M, Franceschi S, Bray F. Worldwide trends in cervical cancer incidence: impact of screening against changes in disease risk factors. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(15):3262‐3273.Liu G, Sharma M, Tan N, Barnabas RV. HIV‐positive women have higher risk of human papilloma virus infection, precancerous lesions, and cervical cancer. AIDS. 2018;32(6):795‐808.Anderson J, Wysong M, Estep D, et al. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in Côte d'Ivoire, Guyana, and Tanzania: effect of HIV status. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0139242.Ghebre RG, Grover S, Xu MJ, Chuang LT, Simonds H. Cervical cancer control in HIV‐infected women: past, present and future. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017;21:101‐108.Mapanga W, Girdler‐Brown B, Feresu SA, Chipato T, Singh E. Prevention of cervical cancer in HIV‐seropositive women from developing countries through cervical cancer screening: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):198.Lyimo FS, Beran TN. Demographic, knowledge, attitudinal, and accessibility factors associated with uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in a rural district of Tanzania: three public policy implications. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):22.Matenge TG, Mash B. Barriers to accessing cervical cancer screening among HIV positive women in Kgatleng district, Botswana: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205425.Wanyenze RK, Bwanika JB, Beyeza‐Kashesya J, Mugerwa S, Arinaitwe J, Matovu JK. Uptake and correlates of cervical cancer screening among HIV‐infected women attending HIV care in Uganda. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1380361.Ebu NI, Ogah JK. Predictors of cervical cancer screening intention of HIV‐positive women in the central region of Ghana. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):43.McFarland DM, Gueldner SM, Mogobe KD. Integrated review of barriers to cervical cancer screening in sub‐Saharan Africa. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016;48(5):490‐498.Assefa AA, Astawesegn FH, Eshetu B. Cervical cancer screening service utilization and associated factors among HIV positive women attending adult ART clinic in public health facilities, Hawassa town, Ethiopia: a cross‐sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):847.Bukirwa A, Mutyoba JN, Mukasa BN, et al. Motivations and barriers to cervical cancer screening among HIV infected women in HIV care: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15(1):82.WHO. Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A Guide to Essential Practice. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO; 2014:408.MoHCDGEC. National guidelines for the management of HIV and AIDS. HIV Prevention. 6th ed. Dar es Salaam: MoHCDGEC; 2017:67‐68.Koneru A, Jolly PE, Blakemore S, et al. Acceptance of peer navigators to reduce barriers to cervical cancer screening and treatment among women with HIV infection in Tanzania. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;138(1):53‐61.MoHCDGEC. HIV Care and Treatment Centres [Internet]. Basic Statistics Tanzania. Available from http://health.opendata.go.tz/dataset/hiv-care-and-treatment-centres. Accessed May 24, 2020. 2020 [cited May 24, 2020]. Available from http://health.opendata.go.tz/dataset/hiv-care-and-treatment-centresMkenda TB, Nokoe KS, Karoki S. Statistical update on the implementation of HIV/AIDS guidelines and policies in Kilimanjaro region‐Tanzania. Heal Sci J. 2019;13(2):640.THIS. Tanzania HIV Impact Survey 2016–2017 Final Report. Tanzania Commission for AIDS, Zanzibar AIDS Commission. Dar es Salaam, The United Republic of Tanzania; 2018.NACP. The United Republic of Tanzania, National Accelerated Action Plan on HIV Testing Services 2019–2020. National Aids Control Program. MoHCDGEC [Internet]. Dodoma, The United Republic of Tanzania; 2018. Available from www.nacp.go.tzNega AD, Woldetsadik MA, Gelagay AA. Low uptake of cervical cancer screening among HIV positive women in Gondar University referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: cross‐sectional study design. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):87.Jassim G, Obeid A, Al Nasheet HA. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cervical cancer and screening among women visiting primary health care Centres in Bahrain. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):128.Adibe MO, Aluh DO. Awareness, knowledge, and attitudes towards cervical cancer amongst HIV‐positive women receiving Care in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(6):1189‐1194.Batra P, Kuhn L, Denny L. Utilisation and outcomes of cervical cancer prevention services among HIV‐infected women in Cape Town. South African Med J. 2010;100(1):39‐44.Lukorito J, Wanyoro A, Kimani H. Uptake of cervical cancer screening among HIV positive women in comprehensive care Centres in Nairobi, Kenya. Res Obstet Gynecol. 2017;5(1):1‐6.Ezechi OC, Gab‐Okafor CV, Ostergren PO, Odberg PK. Willingness and acceptability of cervical cancer screening among HIV positive Nigerian women. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):46.Cross SL, Suharwardy SH, Bodavula P, et al. Improving cervical cancer screening rates in an urban HIV clinic. AIDS Care. 2014;26(9):1186‐1193.Dal Maso L, Franceschi S, Lise M, et al. Self‐reported history of pap‐smear in HIV‐positive women in northern Italy: a cross‐sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:310.Stuardo V. Low prevalence of cervical cancer screening among HIV‐positive women in Catalonia (Spain). J AIDS Clin Res. 2013;1(S3):004.Makuvire T, Butler LM, ‘the Ngubane S, Andrew D, Katz IT. Experiences, beliefs, and attitudes about cervical cancer screening among women in Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu‐Natal, in South Africa: A qualitative study; 2018; Havard Medical School.Williams M, Moneyham L, Kempf MC, Chamot E, Scarinci I. Structural and sociocultural factors associated with cervical cancer screening among HIV‐infected African American women in Alabama. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29(1):13‐19.Shiferaw S, Addissie A, Gizaw M, et al. Knowledge about cervical cancer and barriers toward cervical cancer screening among HIV‐positive women attending public health centers in Addis Ababa city. Ethiopia Cancer Med. 2018;7(3):903‐912.Ogunwale AN, Coleman MA, Sangi‐Haghpeykar H, et al. Assessment of factors impacting cervical cancer screening among low‐income women living with HIV‐AIDS. AIDS Care. 2016;28(4):491‐494.

Journal

Cancer Reports – Wiley

Published: Oct 1, 2021

Keywords: attitude; cervical cancer; cervical cancer screening; Kilimanjaro; knowledge; women living with HIV

There are no references for this article.