Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

IPO Underpricing and Audit Quality Differentiation within Non‐Big 5 Firms

IPO Underpricing and Audit Quality Differentiation within Non‐Big 5 Firms The choice of a non‐Big 5 audit firm is optimal for some IPO companies. The choice of audit firm is important because auditor reputation may influence the pricing of the offering. This paper investigates the relationship between IPO underpricing and auditor compensation and proxies for non‐Big 5 audit quality. We develop a continuous measure of auditor reputation based on factor analysis. This measure of auditor reputation is associated with lower IPO underpricing and higher auditor compensation, suggesting that auditor quality is an important determinant for firms hiring non‐Big 5 auditors. We also examine the underlying constructs for auditor quality to determine their separate effects on IPO underpricing and auditor quality. Non‐Big 5 national firms are associated with lower underpricing and higher auditor compensation, suggesting that these firms are perceived to be quality differentiated from non‐national firms. SEC experience for non‐national firms is associated with higher audit fees, suggesting this experience is perceived to be valuable. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Auditing Wiley

IPO Underpricing and Audit Quality Differentiation within Non‐Big 5 Firms

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/ipo-underpricing-and-audit-quality-differentiation-within-non-big-5-oXqrTo5Q1L

References (46)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
1090-6738
eISSN
1099-1123
DOI
10.1111/j.1099-1123.2007.00360.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The choice of a non‐Big 5 audit firm is optimal for some IPO companies. The choice of audit firm is important because auditor reputation may influence the pricing of the offering. This paper investigates the relationship between IPO underpricing and auditor compensation and proxies for non‐Big 5 audit quality. We develop a continuous measure of auditor reputation based on factor analysis. This measure of auditor reputation is associated with lower IPO underpricing and higher auditor compensation, suggesting that auditor quality is an important determinant for firms hiring non‐Big 5 auditors. We also examine the underlying constructs for auditor quality to determine their separate effects on IPO underpricing and auditor quality. Non‐Big 5 national firms are associated with lower underpricing and higher auditor compensation, suggesting that these firms are perceived to be quality differentiated from non‐national firms. SEC experience for non‐national firms is associated with higher audit fees, suggesting this experience is perceived to be valuable.

Journal

International Journal of AuditingWiley

Published: Jul 1, 2007

There are no references for this article.