Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

INFORMED PARENTAL CONSENT FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION OF YOUNG DEAF CHILDREN: SOCIAL AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS IN THE USE OF THE ‘BIONIC EAR’

INFORMED PARENTAL CONSENT FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION OF YOUNG DEAF CHILDREN: SOCIAL AND OTHER... This paper examines the social parameters surrounding the management of informed consent procedures for the parents of young deaf children for the surgical fitting of a cochlear implant (‘bionic ear’) to their child. Although most observers of this remarkable and well publicised medical development only see benefits in its use, the authors examine the nature of the conflict which has emerged between medical and media portrayals of the ‘miracle ’ device and the contrasting social, cultural and linguistic views of many Deaf people. The paper analyses the components of parental consent procedures for surgical implantation of their child, covering the risk‐benefit analysis and, in particular, the information base that is provided for parents about the social construction of a ‘Deaf life’ by many Deaf people. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Social Issues Wiley

INFORMED PARENTAL CONSENT FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION OF YOUNG DEAF CHILDREN: SOCIAL AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS IN THE USE OF THE ‘BIONIC EAR’

Australian Journal of Social Issues , Volume 35 (2) – May 1, 2000

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/informed-parental-consent-for-cochlear-implantation-of-young-deaf-LRRldRwc3z

References (17)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© Australian Social Policy Association
eISSN
1839-4655
DOI
10.1002/j.1839-4655.2000.tb01089.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper examines the social parameters surrounding the management of informed consent procedures for the parents of young deaf children for the surgical fitting of a cochlear implant (‘bionic ear’) to their child. Although most observers of this remarkable and well publicised medical development only see benefits in its use, the authors examine the nature of the conflict which has emerged between medical and media portrayals of the ‘miracle ’ device and the contrasting social, cultural and linguistic views of many Deaf people. The paper analyses the components of parental consent procedures for surgical implantation of their child, covering the risk‐benefit analysis and, in particular, the information base that is provided for parents about the social construction of a ‘Deaf life’ by many Deaf people.

Journal

Australian Journal of Social IssuesWiley

Published: May 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.