Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. McConkey, S. Abbott, P. Walsh, C. Linehan, E. Emerson (2007)
Variations in the social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities in supported living schemes and residential settings.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 51 Pt 3
C. Driscoll, Coral Kemp (1996)
Establishing the equivalence of single word reading and language in children with disabilitiesJournal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 21
Raymond Lemay (2009)
Deinstitutionalization of People With Developmental Disabilities: A Review of the LiteratureCanadian journal of community mental health, 28
E. Emerson (2004)
Cluster housing for adults with intellectual disabilitiesJournal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 29
J. Perry, D. Felce (2005)
Factors associated with outcome in community group homes.American journal of mental retardation : AJMR, 110 2
J. Perry, D. Felce (2005)
Correlation between subjective and objective measures of outcome in staffed community housing.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 49 Pt 4
T. Greenhalgh, G. Robert, F. Macfarlane, P. Bate, O. Kyriakidou (2004)
Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.The Milbank quarterly, 82 4
David Strauss, Theodore Kastner, R. Shavelle (1998)
Mortality of adults with developmental disabilities living in California institutions and community care, 1985-1994.Mental retardation, 36 5
E. Emerson, J. Robertson, N. Gregory, C. Hatton, S. Kessissoglou, A. Hallam, K. Järbrink, M. Knapp, A. Netten, P. Walsh (2001)
Quality and costs of supported living residences and group homes in the United Kingdom.American journal of mental retardation : AJMR, 106 5
Á. Kozma, J. Mansell, J. Beadle‐Brown (2009)
Outcomes in different residential settings for people with intellectual disability: a systematic review.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 114 3
P. Hyland, R. Beckett (2005)
Engendering an innovative culture and maintaining operational balanceJournal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12
E. Ferlie, S. Shortell (2001)
Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change.The Milbank quarterly, 79 2
S. Kim, S. Larson, K. Lakin (2001)
Behavioural outcomes of deinstitutionalisation for people with intellectual disability: a review of US studies conducted between 1980 and 1999Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 26
J. Conroy, S. Spreat, A. Yuskauskas, M. Elks (2003)
The Hissom closure outcomes study: a report on six years of movement to supported living.Mental retardation, 41 4
Jay Jamrog, M. Vickers, D. Bear (2006)
Building and Sustaining a Culture That Supports Innovation, 29
Walsh Walsh, Kastner Kastner, Green Green (2003)
Cost comparisons of community and residential settings: historical review of selected researchMental Retardation, 41
R. Waterman, T. Peters, J. Phillips (1980)
Structure is not organizationBusiness Horizons, 23
L. Young (2006)
Community and cluster centre residential services for adults with intellectual disability: long-term results from an Australian-matched sample.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 50 Pt 6
G. Fujiura (2006)
Lessons drawn from the critique of the Hissom closure evaluation.Mental retardation, 44 5
K. Walsh, T. Kastner, Reg Green (2003)
Cost comparisons of community and institutional residential settings: historical review of selected research.Mental retardation, 41 2
D. Felce, E. Jones, K. Lowe, J. Perry (2003)
Rational resourcing and productivity: relationships among staff input, resident characteristics, and group home quality.American journal of mental retardation : AJMR, 108 3
Prouty Prouty, Lakin Lakin, Coucouvanis Coucouvanis (2007)
Trends & milestones: in 2006, fewer than 30% of persons receiving out‐of‐family‐residential supports lived in homes of more than six residentsIntellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45
D. Braddock, E. Emerson, D. Felce, R. Stancliffe (2001)
Living circumstances of children and adults with mental retardation or developmental disabilities in the United States, Canada, England and Wales, and Australia.Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews, 7 2
R. Friedlander (2006)
Mental health for persons with intellectual disability in the post-deinstitutionalization era: experiences from British Columbia.The Israel journal of psychiatry and related sciences, 43 4
R. Prouty, K. Lakin, Kathryn Coucouvanis (2007)
In 2006, fewer than 30% of persons receiving out-of-family residential supports lived in homes of more than six residents.Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 45 4
S. Parish (2005)
Deinstitutionalization in Two States: The Impact of Advocacy, Policy, and other Social Forces on Services for People with Developmental DisabilitiesResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30
K. Lakin, R. Stancliffe (2007)
Residential supports for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews, 13 2
D. Felce, J. Perry (1995)
The extent of support for ordinary living provided in staffed housing: the relationship between staffing levels, resident characteristics, staff: resident interactions and resident activity patterns.Social science & medicine, 40 6
Jan TØssebro, Hege Lundeby (2006)
Family attitudes to deinstitutionalisation: Changes during and after reform years in a Scandinavian countryJournal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 31
Amy Kampert, A. Goreczny (2007)
Community involvement and socialization among individuals with mental retardation.Research in developmental disabilities, 28 3
Rupatharshini Chilvers, Geraldine Macdonald, Alex Hayes (2006)
Supported housing for people with severe mental disorders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 4
Background Community care is the support of people with intellectual disability in everyday life aimed at enhancing their integration into society. This article investigates influences of organizational characteristics on the implementation of community care in the Netherlands. In addition, we explored whether the attributes of community care as an innovative process might impede successful implementation. Methods Findings from a questionnaire among 96 managers in seven care organizations for people with intellectual disability are presented. Results The main reasons for innovation are to meet the demands of clients and to improve the primary care process. The most important external influence on the implementation process is government finance. The results also support the notion that problems with the implementation process of community care are related to organizational characteristics and the attributes of community care. Conclusion An innovative management style was found to be associated with a more successful implementation of community care. Lack of observability of the innovation, perceived complexity, incompatibility with norms and values of employees, and lack of possibilities to experiment (triability) are important barriers in the implementation process.
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.