Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Impaired Comprehension of Alternating Syntactic Constructions in Autism

Impaired Comprehension of Alternating Syntactic Constructions in Autism The authors realized that Tables and were switched in their article, and the tables should instead appear as follows: 2 Stimulus Sentence Types and Distribution Sentence type Sample sentence Alternating double object (DO‐A) Sally read Harry the book. Alternating prepositional object (PO‐A) Harry read the book to Sally. Restricted double object (DO‐R) Gary bought Laura the puppy. Restricted prepositional object (PO‐R) Lily drove the truck to Toby. Passives (control) Joey was shown the mouse by Sarah. ASD, autism spectrum disorder. 3 Mean Accuracy Rates Across Conditions for Each Group (and Standard Deviation) Children with ASD Control children Alternating double object 0.618 (0.165) 0.652 (0.224) Restricted double object 0.640 (0.218) 0.611 (0.287) Alternating prepositional object 0.664 (0.224) 0.779 (0.151) Restricted prepositional object 0.761 (0.178) 0.803 (0.159) Passive 0.518 (0.179) 0.476 (0.152) The main effect of construction on the accuracy rates of sentences showed significance (DO: x ̅ = 0.630 , s = 0.034; PO: x ̅ = 0.752 , s = 0.027; F(1,34) = 21.76, P < 0.001, η P 2 = 0.39). There were no significant main effects of group (ASD: x ̅ = 0.67 , s = 0.039; control: x ̅ = 0.711 , s = 0.039; F(1,34) = 0.537, P = 0.469) or restriction (A: x ̅ = 0.678 , s = 0.028; R: x ̅ = 0.704 , s = 0.030; F(1,34) = 1.975, P = 0.169). A, alternating; DO, double object; PO, prepositional object; R, restricted. The authors regret the errors. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Autism Research Wiley

Impaired Comprehension of Alternating Syntactic Constructions in Autism

Autism Research , Volume 8 (2) – Apr 1, 2015

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/impaired-comprehension-of-alternating-syntactic-constructions-in-LYP938DEhn

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2015 International Society for Autism Research and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN
1939-3792
eISSN
1939-3806
DOI
10.1002/aur.1402
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The authors realized that Tables and were switched in their article, and the tables should instead appear as follows: 2 Stimulus Sentence Types and Distribution Sentence type Sample sentence Alternating double object (DO‐A) Sally read Harry the book. Alternating prepositional object (PO‐A) Harry read the book to Sally. Restricted double object (DO‐R) Gary bought Laura the puppy. Restricted prepositional object (PO‐R) Lily drove the truck to Toby. Passives (control) Joey was shown the mouse by Sarah. ASD, autism spectrum disorder. 3 Mean Accuracy Rates Across Conditions for Each Group (and Standard Deviation) Children with ASD Control children Alternating double object 0.618 (0.165) 0.652 (0.224) Restricted double object 0.640 (0.218) 0.611 (0.287) Alternating prepositional object 0.664 (0.224) 0.779 (0.151) Restricted prepositional object 0.761 (0.178) 0.803 (0.159) Passive 0.518 (0.179) 0.476 (0.152) The main effect of construction on the accuracy rates of sentences showed significance (DO: x ̅ = 0.630 , s = 0.034; PO: x ̅ = 0.752 , s = 0.027; F(1,34) = 21.76, P < 0.001, η P 2 = 0.39). There were no significant main effects of group (ASD: x ̅ = 0.67 , s = 0.039; control: x ̅ = 0.711 , s = 0.039; F(1,34) = 0.537, P = 0.469) or restriction (A: x ̅ = 0.678 , s = 0.028; R: x ̅ = 0.704 , s = 0.030; F(1,34) = 1.975, P = 0.169). A, alternating; DO, double object; PO, prepositional object; R, restricted. The authors regret the errors.

Journal

Autism ResearchWiley

Published: Apr 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.