Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1988)
Echte Ma¨use oder Langschwanzma¨-use
I. Hoffmeyer (1973)
Interaction and habitat selection in the mice Apodemus flavicollis and A. sylvaticusOikos, 24
(1981)
Development of mass rearing technology
(1988)
Predation: its influence on population dynamics and adaptive changes in morphology and behavior of the Lymantriidae
(1985)
Wildlife and the gypsy moth
Tadayuki Inoue (1991)
Sex difference in spatial distribution of the big-clawed shrew Sorex unguiculatusActa Theriologica, 36
Harvey Smith, C. Remington (1996)
Food specificity in interspecies competitionBioScience, 46
R. Fuester, J. Drea, F. Gruber, H. Hoyer, G. Mercadier (1983)
Larval Parasites and Other Natural Enemies of Lymantria Dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in Burgenland, Austria, and Würzburg, GermanyEnvironmental Entomology, 12
A. Burgess (1929)
The Present Status of Gipsy Moth, Brown-Tail Moth and Satin Moth ControlJournal of Economic Entomology, 22
Z. Pucek, W. Jędrzejewski, B. Jędrzejewska, M. Pucek (1993)
Rodent population dynamics in a primeval deciduous forest (Białowieża National Park) in relation to weather, seed crop, and predationActa Theriologica, 38
M. Mazurkiewicz (1991)
Population dynamics and demography of the bank vole in different tree standsActa Theriologica, 36
C. Whelan, R. Holmes, Harvey Smith (1989)
Bird Predation on Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) Larvae: An Aviary StudyEnvironmental Entomology, 18
E. Wołk (1969)
Body weight and daily food intake in captive shrewsActa Theriologica, 14
(1981)
Gypsy moth predators. In: The Gypsy Moth: Research Toward Integrated Pest Management, US Dept Agric
(1978)
Predators of the Gypsy Moth, US Dept Agric
(1958)
Extermination by rodents of the gypsy moth in the area of its mass reproduction
J. Elkinton, Andrew Liebhold (1990)
POPULATION DYNAMICS OF GYPSY MOTH IN NORTH AMERICAAnnual Review of Entomology, 35
R. Campbell, R. Sloan (1977)
Natural Regulation of Innocuous Gypsy Moth PopulationsEnvironmental Entomology, 6
(1988)
Echte Mäuse oder Langschwanzmäuse
(1960)
Siedlungsbeziehungen einiger kleiner Waldsa¨ugetiere auf Grund einer Kartierung
R. Cooper, Harvey Smith (1995)
Predation on Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) Egg Masses by BirdsEnvironmental Entomology, 24
M. Shapiro, C. Owens, R. Bell, H. Wood (1981)
Simplified, Efficient System for In Vivo Mass Production of Gypsy Moth Nucleopolyhedrosis VirusJournal of Economic Entomology, 74
A. Burgess (1930)
The Gipsy Moth And The Brown-tail Moth And Their Control...
FURUTA FURUTA (1982)
Natural control of Lymantria dispar L. (Lep., Lymantriidae) population at low density levels in Hokkaido (Japan)Z. Ang. Ent., 93
(1960)
Siedlungsbeziehungen einiger kleiner Waldsäugetiere auf Grund einer Kartierung
(1936)
Der Schwammspinner in Eurasien, Africa und Neuengland. Berlin: P. Parey
Ed
M. Mazurkiewicz (1994)
Factors influencing the distribution of the bank vole in forest habitatsActa Theriologica, 39
(1998)
Comparison of the potential role of small mammal predators of forest pest insects in the US and former SovietUnion: a study of ecological equivalents. In: Euro-American Mammal Congress – Abstracts
(1986)
Ordnung Rodentia, Nagetiere
(1981)
Gypsy moth predators
A. Kalinowska (1971)
Trapping of Apodemus flavicollis and Clethrionomys glareolus into a double trapActa Theriologica, 16
(1958)
Extermination by rodents of the gypsy moth in the area of its mass reproduction. BYULL, MOSK. O-Va
(1996)
Food specificity in interspecies competition: comparisons between terrestrial vertebrates and arthropods
L. Canova, M. Fasola (1991)
Comminities of small mammals in six biotopes of northern ItalyActa Theriologica, 36
C. Buckner (1969)
THE COMMON SHREW (SOREX ARANEUS) AS A PREDATOR OF THE WINTER MOTH (OPEROPHTERA BRUMATA) NEAR OXFORD, ENGLANDThe Canadian Entomologist, 101
(1995)
Der Antagonistenkomplex des Schwammspinners, Lymantria dispar L. (Lep. Lymantriidae) in Populationen hoher, mittlerer und niedriger Dichte im Burgenland
R. Campbell, R. Sloan (1976)
Influence of Behavioral Evolution on Gypsy Moth Pupal Survival in Sparse PopulationsEnvironmental Entomology, 5
A. R., Lautenschlager
Predators of the Gypsy Moth
(1936)
Der Schwammspinner in Eurasien
C. Buckner (1967)
Avian and mammalian predators of forest insectsEntomophaga, 12
R. Weseloh (1985)
Changes in Population Size, Dispersal Behavior, and Reproduction of Calosoma sycophanta (Coleoptera: Carabidae), Associated with Changes in Gypsy Moth, Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), AbundanceEnvironmental Entomology, 14
(1998)
Comparison of the potential role of small mammal predators of forest pest insects in the US and former Soviet Union: a study of ecological equivalents
R. Campbell, D. Hubbard, R. Sloan (1975)
Location of Gypsy Moth Pupae and Subsequent Pupal Survival in Sparse, Stable PopulationsEnvironmental Entomology, 4
J. Elkinton, W. Healy, J. Buonaccorsi, G. Boettner, Anne Hazzard, Harvey Smith (1996)
Interactions Among Gypsy Moths, White‐footed Mice, and AcornsEcology, 77
HOCH HOCH, GSCHWANTNER GSCHWANTNER, SCHOPF SCHOPF (1999)
The gypsy moth and its natural enemies at different population densities in the oak forests of eastern AustriaIOBC Bull., 22
R. Weseloh (1985)
PREDATION BY CALOSOMA SYCOPHANTA L. (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE): EVIDENCE FOR A LARGE IMPACT ON GYPSY MOTH, LYMANTRIA DISPAR L. (LEPIDOPTERA: LYMANTRIIDAE), PUPAEThe Canadian Entomologist, 117
T. Mappes (1998)
High population density in bank voles stimulates food hoarding after breedingAnimal Behaviour, 55
(1990)
Gypsy moth predators: an example of generalist and specialist natural enemies
The impact of predators on artificially augmented populations of Lymantria dispar pupae (Lep., Lymantriidae) and the species composition of the predator community were investigated in two oak stands in eastern Austria. The population density of L. dispar has been at innocuous levels for several years at both sites. From mid‐June to mid‐July, we created artificial prey populations by mounting gypsy moth pupae with beeswax on burlap bands placed at the base, 25, 50 and 100 cm height on 25 trees at each site. A total of 6600 pupae were exposed at each site. A total of 92% of exposed pupae were destroyed by predators, at site I (with dense understorey vegetation) whereas 67% were destroyed on site II (with sparse understorey vegetation). Initially, pupal mortality was highest at the base of trees, but differences in mortality among the four locations where pupae were exposed decreased during the course of the study period. Spatial differences in predation were ascertained, suggesting that the aggregation of small mammals, for example, is related to patches of dense shrub vegetation. Pupal mortality was primarily caused by mice (46.3% at site I and 36.4% at site II). Many exposed pupae simply disappeared (40.4% at site I and 22.8% at site II). Calosoma spp. and other invertebrate predators caused very little mortality among L. dispar pupae (5.5% at site I and 7.8% at site II). Trap catches on separate study plots at both sites revealed that Apodemus flavicollis (Rodentia, Muridae) was the most important predator species present, whereas Apodemus sylvaticus (Rodentia, Muridae) and Clethrionomys glareolus (Rodentia, Arvicolidae) were captured in low numbers.
Journal of Applied Entomology – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.