Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. A. Lieberman, I. D. Yalom, M. B. Miles (1973)
Encounter groups: First facts
G. Egan (1970)
Encounter
J. Lederman (1969)
Anger and the rocking chair
Michèle Zide (1973)
Group Dynamics TechniquesThe Personnel and Guidance Journal, 51
M. Parloff (1970)
Group therapy and the small-group field: an encounter.International journal of group psychotherapy, 20 3
J. Kuehn, F. Crinella (1969)
Sensitivity training: interpersonal "overkill" and other problems.The American journal of psychiatry, 126 6
A. H. Gorman (1969)
Teachers and learners: The interactive process of education
Douglas Bunker (1965)
Individual Applications of Laboratory TrainingThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1
G. A. Brown (1971)
Human teaching for human learning
C. R. Rogers (1970)
Encounter groups
W. Eddy, B. Lubin (1971)
Laboratory training and encounter groupsThe Personnel and Guidance Journal, 49
C. Rogers (1968)
Interpersonal Relationships: U.S.A. 2000The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 4
O. Davis, N. Bowers (1961)
Group sensitivity training in a teacher education program: An initial attemptPeabody Journal of Education, 39
P. Hurewitz (1970)
Ethical considerations in leading therapeutic and quasi‐therapeutic groups, 24
T. Borton (1970)
Reach, touch and teach
G. Weinstein, M. Fantini (1970)
Toward humanistic education: A curriculum of affect
M. Lakin (1972)
Interpersonal encounter: Theory and practice in sensitivity training
Peter Smith (1975)
Are There Adverse Effects of Sensitivity Training?Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 15
W. Beatty (1969)
Emotions: The missing link in educationTheory Into Practice, 8
U. Palomares, T. Rubini (1973)
Human Development in the Classroom.The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 51
Human relations training in many forms, the best known of which are encounter groups, enjoys wide popularity in industry, government and education. Some ‘professional’ objections to the running of such groups are raised, and it is proposed that these objections may be partially answered if there is a non‐profit‐making national association of group leaders whose function would be to provide a code of ethics to members and information to the public. As well as these professional objections involving the areas of leadership, screening and casualties, there are also objections to the 'process' of groups itself; to these latter objections arising out of an individual's sensibility and subjective interpretations of events, no compelling reply can be given. Affirmation of the interactions in encounter groups is likewise a subjective matter.
Australian Journal of Social Issues – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1976
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.