Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Kennedy, A. O’Hagan (2000)
Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are availableBiometrika, 87
A. Atkinson (1995)
Optimum Experimental Designs
A. Okabe, B. Boots, K. Sugihara (1992)
Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams
Peter Qian, WU C.F.Jeff (2008)
Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Integrating Low-Accuracy and High-Accuracy ExperimentsTechnometrics, 50
K. Fang, Runze Li, A. Sudjianto (2005)
Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments (Computer Science & Data Analysis)
A. Vaart (1998)
Asymptotic Statistics: Frontmatter
T. Santner, Brett Williams, W. Notz (2003)
The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments
(2011)
How to choose the simulations model for computer
Raymond Myers, Douglas Montgomery (1996)
Response surface methodologyIie Transactions, 28
A. Vaart (1998)
Asymptotic Statistics: U -Statistics
M. Bayarri, J. Berger, Rui Paulo, J. Sacks, J. Cafeo, J. Cavendish, Chin-Hsu Lin, J. Tu (2007)
A Framework for Validation of Computer ModelsTechnometrics, 49
Buhmann Buhmann (2000)
Radial basis functionsActa Numerica, 9
Marie Samozino, Marc Alexa, P. Alliez, M. Yvinec (2006)
Reconstruction with Voronoi centered radial basis functions
Mühlenstädt Mühlenstädt, Kuhnt Kuhnt (2011)
Kernel interpolationComputational Statistics and Data Analysis
In many scientific areas, non‐stochastic simulation models such as finite element simulations replace real experiments. A common approach is to fit a meta‐model, for example a Gaussian process model, a radial basis function interpolation, or a kernel interpolation, to computer experiments conducted with the simulation model. This article deals with situations where more than one simulation model is available for the same real experiment, with none being the best over all possible input combinations. From fitted models for a real experiment as well as for computer experiments using the different simulation models, a criterion is derived to identify the locally best one. Applying this criterion to a number of design points allows the design space to be split into areas where the individual simulation models are locally superior. An example from sheet metal forming is analyzed, where three different simulation models are available. In this application and many similar problems, the new approach provides valuable assistance with the choice of the simulation model to be used. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.