Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Christopher Géczy, Bernadette Minton, Catherine Schrand (1996)
Why Firms Use Currency DerivativesOhio State University
Kenneth Froot, D. Scharfstein, J. Stein (1992)
Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing PoliciesRisk Management eJournal
(1977)
The determination of financial structure: the incentive signaling approach Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation The case for convertibles
Michael Jensen (1986)
Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and TakeoversIndustrial Organization & Regulation eJournal
Deborah Lucas, R. McDonald (1989)
Equity Issues and Stock Price DynamicsNBER Working Paper Series
M. Harris, A. Raviv (1988)
Corporate control contests and capital structureJournal of Financial Economics, 20
S. Titman (1984)
The effect of capital structure on a firm's liquidation decision☆Journal of Financial Economics, 13
This paper summarizes the findings of the authors' recent survey of 392 CFOs about the current practice of corporate finance, with main focus on the areas of capital budgeting and capital structure. The findings of the survey are predictable in some respects but surprising in others. For example, although the discounted cash flow method taught in our business schools is much more widely used as a project evaluation method than it was ten or 20 years ago, the popularity of the payback method continues despite shortcomings that have been pointed out for years. In setting capital structure policy, CFOs appear to place less emphasis on formal leverage targets that reflect the trade‐off between the costs and benefits of debt than on “informal” criteria such as credit ratings and financial flexibility. And despite the efforts of academics to demonstrate that EPS dilution per se should be irrelevant to stock valuation, avoiding dilution of EPS was the most cited reason for companies reluctance to issue equity. But despite such apparent contradictions between theory and practice, finance theory does seem to be gaining ground. For example, large companies were much more likely than their smaller counterparts to use DCF and NPV techniques, while small firms still tended to rely heavily on the payback criterion. And a majority of the CFOs of the large companies said they had “strict” or “somewhat strict” target debt ratios, whereas only a third of small firms claimed to have such targets. What does the future hold? On the one hand, the authors suggest that we are likely to see greater corporate acceptance of certain aspects of financial theory, including the use of real options techniques for evaluating corporate investments. But we are also likely to see further modifications and refinements of the theory, particularly with respect to smaller companies that have limited access to capital markets.
Journal of Applied Corporate Finance – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.