Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Randell-Moon (2006)
'Common values': whiteness, Christianity, asylum seekers and the Howard Government, 2
(1969)
Convention Relating to the Status of RefugeesAmerican Journal of International Law, 63
G. Cornelisse (2010)
Immigration Detention and Human Rights
(2016)
Nauru Abuse Reports Warrant Urgent Action to Protect Children in Offshore Detention
M. Kalderon (2011)
Before the lawPhilosophical Issues, 21
P. Gale (2004)
The refugee crisis and fearJournal of Sociology, 40
R. D'amico (1978)
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the PrisonTelos, 1978
A. Vogl (2014)
Over the Borderline: A Critical Inquiry into the Geography of Territorial Excision and the Securitisation of the Australian BorderLabor: Public Policy & Regulation eJournal
K. Mcphail, R. Nyamori, Savitri Taylor (2016)
Escaping Accountability: A Case of Australia's Asylum Seeker PolicyAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29
Communication No 2136/2012: Views Adopted by the Committee at its 108th Session (8-26
J. Mcculloch (2004)
National (in)Security Politics in AustraliaAlternative Law Journal, 29
Ola (1999)
No. 14668. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 16 December 1966United Nations Treaty Series, 1994
(2017)
Majid Karami Kamasaee v The Commonwealth of Australia and Ors. Settlement Approval'. Supreme Court of Victoria
G. Triggs (2015)
The Forgotten Children: National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention 2014Medical Journal of Australia, 202
L. Green, L. Jacka (2003)
The New ‘others’: Media and Society Post-September 11Media International Australia, 109
F. McKay, Sa Thomas, S. Kneebone (2012)
‘It would be okay if they came through the proper channels’: community perceptions and attitudes toward asylum seekers in AustraliaJournal of Refugee Studies, 25
(2008)
Public Network Analysis, in R
(2002)
Irregular asylum seekers: rhetoric vs reality
D. Every, M. Augoustinos (2007)
Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekersDiscourse & Society, 18
J. Pizarro, Vanja Stenius (2004)
Supermax Prisons: Their Rise, Current Practices, and Effect on InmatesThe Prison Journal, 84
P. Smith, G. Gömöri, C. Wilmer (1999)
Dark victoryIndex on Censorship, 28
S. Ozdowski (2004)
A Last Resort?Alternative Law Journal, 29
H. Milward, Jörg Raab (2006)
Dark Networks as Organizational Problems: Elements of a Theory 1International Public Management Journal, 9
(2014)
One Step Forward, Many Steps Back for Refugees
S. Gifford (2010)
Human Rights Overboard: Seeking asylum in AustraliaAustralian Social Work, 63
A. Nethery, R. Holman (2016)
Secrecy and human rights abuse in Australia’s offshore immigration detention centresThe International Journal of Human Rights, 20
S. Maier, M. Seligman (2016)
Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience.Psychological review, 123 4
D. McMaster (2002)
Asylum-seekers and the insecurity of a nationAustralian Journal of International Affairs, 56
K. Dunn, Natascha Klocker, Tanya Salabay (2007)
Contemporary racism and Islamaphobia in AustraliaEthnicities, 7
F. Aoláin (1977)
International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsSecurity Dialogue, 8
X. Bosch (2007)
The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn EvilJAMA, 298
(2016)
The Nauru Files: The Lives of Asylum Seekers in Detention Detailed in a Unique Database
Statistics on People in Australia's Onshore Detention System
(2001)
The Possibility of a Correctional Ethic, in J
An analysis of reports by the Ombudsman under s 486O of the Migration Act 1958 sent to the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection in 2015-16
Gresham Sykes (2007)
The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison
S. Poynting, G. Noble (2003)
‘Dog-Whistle’ Journalism and Muslim Australians since 2001Media International Australia, 109
Jörg Raab, H. Milward (2003)
Dark Networks as ProblemsJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13
A. Suhnan, Anne Pedersen, L. Hartley (2012)
Re-examining prejudice against asylum seekers in Australia: The role of people smugglers, the perception of threat, and acceptance of false beliefs
(2015)
Federal Government Scrambles to Close Loophole Making Offshore Immigration Detention 'Illegal
Azadeh Dastyari, M. O’sullivan, Tania Penovic (2014)
Submission to the Australian Human Rights Commission National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention
S. Poynting, G. Noble, P. Tabar, J. Collins (2004)
Bin Laden in the Suburbs: Criminalising the Arab Other
J. Phillips (2013)
Asylum seekers and refugees: what are the facts? February 2013
R. Devetak (2004)
In fear of refugees: the politics of Border Protection in AustraliaThe International Journal of Human Rights, 8
E. Goffman (1961)
Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates
(2010)
Exclusion and National Identity: The Language of Immigration and Border Control in Australian Federal Election Campaigns, 1903 and 2001
M. Peterie (2017)
Docility and desert: Government discourses of compassion in Australia’s asylum seeker debateJournal of Sociology, 53
C. Fleay (2015)
The limitations of monitoring immigration detention in AustraliaAustralian Journal of Human Rights, 21
(2013)
The Trauma of the Incarceration Experience
J. McAdam, Fiona Chong (2014)
Refugees: Why seeking asylum is legal and Australia's policies are not
C. Dauvergne (2005)
Humanitarianism, identity, and nation : migration laws of Australia and Canada
K. Gelber (2003)
A fair queue? Australian public discourse on refugees and immigrationJournal of Australian Studies, 27
C. Flinterman (2015)
The United Nations Human Rights CommitteeNetherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 33
J. Phillips, H. Spinks (2012)
Immigration detention in Australia
The notion of dark networks has recently received attention in the literature on policy network analysis. Dark networks are defined as illegal and covert, in contrast to bright networks which are legal and overt. In this article, we suggest a third category – grey networks – which are characterised by their use of secrecy and concealment despite their ostensibly legal status. These networks are subject to contradictory imperatives. They employ methods that cannot be openly acknowledged within the larger legal and social framework in which they function. In this article, we illustrate this concept through an interview‐based study of Australia's immigration detention network. This network enacts a deterrence policy which has been widely condemned as breaching Australia's obligations under international law. At the same time, it is required to maintain a façade of lawfulness and respect for human rights.
Asia Pacific Viewpoint – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.