Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Kondolf, R. Curry (1986)
Channel erosion along the Carmel river, Monterey county, CaliforniaEarth Surface Processes and Landforms, 11
Johnson Johnson (1944)
Problems of terrace correlationBulletin of the Geological Society of America, 55
Thomas Myers, S. Swanson (1991)
AQUATIC HABITAT CONDITION INDEX, STREAM TYPE, AND LWESTOCK BANK DAMAGE IN NORTHERN NEVADAJournal of The American Water Resources Association, 27
C. Frissell, Richard Nawa (1992)
Incidence and Causes of Physical Failure of Artificial Habitat Structures in Streams of Western Oregon and WashingtonNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 12
K. Kern (1994)
Grundlagen naturnaher Gewässergestaltung
J. Brice (1982)
STREAM CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT
Nevins Nevins (1965)
River classification with particular respect to New ZealandProceedings of the 4th New Zealand Geography Conference, Dunedin., 4
G. Kondolf, M. Larson (1995)
Historical channel analysis and its application to riparian and aquatic habitat restorationAquatic Conservation-marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 5
Pennak Pennak (1971)
Towards a classification of lotic habitatsHydrobiologia, 38
J. Hooke, R. Kain (1982)
Historical change in the physical environment : a guide to sources and techniques
Maddock Maddock (1970)
Indeterminate hydraulics of alluvial channelsJournal of the Hydraulics Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 96
M. Furse, D. Moss, J. Wright, P. Armitage (1984)
The influence of seasonal and taxonomic factors on the ordination and classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain and on the prediction of their macro‐invertebrate communitiesFreshwater Biology, 14
W. Platts (1980)
A Plea for Fishery Habitat ClassificationFisheries, 5
D. Johnson (1944)
Problems of terrace correlationGeological Society of America Bulletin, 55
Brussock Brussock, Brown Brown, Dixon Dixon (1985)
Channel form and stream ecosystem modelsWater Resources Bulletin, 21
Myers Myers, Swanson Swanson (1991)
Aquatic habitat condition index, stream type, and livestock bank damage in northern NevadaWater Resources Bulletin, 27
J. Corliss, P. Sneath, R. Sokal (1973)
Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification
P. Brussock, Arthur Brown, J. Dixon (1985)
CHANNEL FORM AND STREAM ECOSYSTEM MODELSJournal of The American Water Resources Association, 21
Kellerhals Kellerhals, Church Church, Bray Bray (1976)
Classification and analysis of river processesJournal of the Hydraulics Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, 102
K. Kern (1994)
Grundlagen naturnaher Gewässergestaltung : Geomorphologische Entwicklung von Fließgewässern
Holmes Holmes (1989)
British rivers: a working classificationBritish Wildlife, 1
N. Null (1992)
Sediment and Aquatic Habitat in River SystemsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 118
A. Brookes (1990)
Restoration and enhancement of engineered river channels: Some european experiencesRegulated Rivers-research & Management, 5
W. Davis (1899)
The Geographical CycleThe Geographical Journal, 14
A. Lobeck (1939)
Geomorphology : an introduction to the study of landscapes
D. Rosgen (1994)
A classification of natural riversCatena, 22
C. Cushing, C. Mcintire, K. Cummins, G. Minshall, R. Petersen, J. Sedell, R. Vannote (1983)
Relationships among chemical, physical, and biological indices along river continua based on multivariate analysesArchiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 98
Cushing Cushing, McIntire McIntire, Sedell Sedell, Cummins Cummins, Minshall Minshall, Petersen Petersen, Vannote Vannote (1980)
Comparative study of physical variables of streams using multivariate analysisArchiv für Hydrobiologie, 89
C. Frissell, W. Liss, C. Warren, M. Hurley (1986)
A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed contextEnvironmental Management, 10
C. Hawkins, J. Kershner, P. Bisson, M. Bryant, Lynn Decker, S. Gregory, D. Mccullough, C. Overton, G. Reeves, R. Steedman, M. Young (1993)
A hierarchical approach to classifying stream habitat featuresFisheries, 18
S. Schumm (1977)
The Fluvial System
I. Jowett, M. Duncan (1990)
Flow variability in New Zealand rivers and its relationship to in‐stream habitat and biotaNew Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 24
J. Wright, D. Moss, P. Armitage, M. Furse (1984)
A preliminary classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain based on macro‐invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental dataFreshwater Biology, 14
R. Vannote, G. Minshall, Kenneth Cummins, J. Sedell, Colbert Gushing (1980)
The River Continuum ConceptCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37
Thomas Myers, S. Swanson (1992)
Variation of stream stability with stream type and lwestock bank damage in northern NevadaJournal of The American Water Resources Association, 28
B. Biggs, M. Duncan, I. Jowett, J. Quinn, C. Hickey, R. Davies‐Colley, M. Close (1990)
Ecological characterisation, classification, and modelling of New Zealand rivers: An introduction and synthesisNew Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 24
Myers Myers, Swanson Swanson (1992)
Variation of stream stability with stream type and livestock damage in northern NevadaWater Resources Bulletin, 28
1 Land managers in western North America have embraced classification of stream channels based on geomorphological characteristics as the importance of channel stability in successful restoration of aquatic and riparian habitat has become widely recognized. 2 Classification can permit rapid inventory of large regions, provide a stratified geomorphological framework within which more detailed observations can be organized, and provide an initial basis for selecting restoration strategies. 3 Existing classifications are arbitrary, developed by creating classes out of a continuum of channel form. Moreover, stream channels are dynamic, and the existing condition does not necessarily reflect former, long‐term, or future conditions. 4 The user should not confuse the classification exercise with a complete understanding of the channel. Before any channel works are actually undertaken, site‐specific studies are essential, including historical studies to determine former channel conditions and to shed light on underlying causes for degradation of aquatic or riparian resources. 5 When applying a classification system, the raw data collected should be reported, not simply the resultant channel classes. Channels that do not fit neatly within pre‐existing classes should be reported as such and not lumped in classes where they ‚should’︁ be.
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.