Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Both (3) and (4) are principles the character of which is relative to the situational context, but the rules derived from (3) will be objective
Both (1) and (2) are absolute conditions for moral judgement (i.e., both concern the formal conditions which apply to moral rules universally)
) and (3) rest on opposite defining characteristics, yet they share a similar (and complementary) function: both principles enable us to tell the difference between right and wrong in the real world
Both (1) and (3) are concerned with objective moral judgements, but (1) is itself an absolute rule whereas the rules derived from (3) will be relative to each situation
) rest on opposite defining characteristics, yet they share a similar (and complementary) function: they are both ideal principles which give rise to corresponding real principles
P. Carmichael (1973)
Kant and JesusPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 33
Both (2) and (4) are subjective principles, in the sense that they define rules which are primarily internal to the human subject
Stephen Palmquist (1986)
Six Perspectives on the Object in Kant's Theory of KnowledgeDialectica, 40
NOTES 1 The next verse reads: ‘For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it shall be measured to you’. The Old Testament contains a text which is similar to Matthew 7:1. In Ezekiel 7:27 God is reported as saying: ‘According to their conduct I shall deal with them, and by their judgments I shall judge them’. (Quotes from biblical texts are taken from The New American Standard Bible, Carol Stream, Ill., Creation House, Inc., 1960.)—When read in conjunction with the parallel passage in Luke 6:37 (‘do not pass judgment and you will not be judged; and do not condemn, and you shall not be condemned; pardon, and you will be pardoned’), Jesus' principle is often regarded simply as a specific warning not to condemn others. However, his statement can also be intrepreted more generally as laying down an absolute principle banning all moral judgement whatsoever. Thus, for example, Schweizer suggests that Matthew 7:1–2 asks us ‘to forgo judging entirely’, because ‘we are lost as long as we live at all by the categories of weighing, measuring, and classifying’ (Eduard Schweizer, The Good News According to Matthew , translated by
The Heythrop Journal – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.