Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Burnaby, M. Abdolmohammadi, S. Hass, L. Paape (2007)
A global summary of the common body of knowledge 2006
(2006)
Common Body of Knowledge in Internal Auditing Data Base
His work on external and internal auditing has appeared in many journals, including The Accounting Review, Auditing: a Journal of Practice and Theory, and Internal Auditing
(2008)
The PCAOB’s proposed guidance for auditors of smaller public companies
G. Hofstede (1983)
Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions
P. Burnaby, M. Abdolmohammadi, S. Hass, Gerrit Sarens, M. Allegrini (2009)
Usage of Internal Auditing Standards by companies in the United States and select European countriesManagerial Auditing Journal, 24
T. Foster (2011)
Benchmarking OR Performance
M. Abdolmohammadi, P. Burnaby, S. Hass (2006)
A review of prior common body of knowledge (CBOK) studies in internal auditing and an overview of the global CBOK 2006Managerial Auditing Journal, 21
G. Hofstede (1983)
National cultures revisitedAsia Pacific Journal of Management, 2
John Kennedy, Martin King
Culture , Leadership , and Organizations : The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies
M. Bradshaw, Gregory Miller (2008)
Will Harmonizing Accounting Standards Really Harmonize Accounting? Evidence from Non-U.S. Firms Adopting U.S. GAAPJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23
S. Gray (1988)
Towards a Theory of Cultural Influence on the Development of Accounting Systems InternationallyAbacus, 24
Chief audit executives (CAEs) are required to use and comply with The International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards). However, this study finds that 13.5 percent of CAEs in Anglo‐culture countries do not use the Standards. Furthermore, of those who use the Standards a significant number fail to comply with specific standards. Multivariate tests of data from CAEs in this study show that ‘Length of IIA membership’ and ‘Internal auditing certification’ are positively associated with use. Other significant variables are ‘Superseded by local/government regulations or standards,’‘Not perceived as value added by management/board’ and ‘Compliance not expected in the country’ that are inversely related to use. The length of training is also positively associated with compliance, while other significant variables are internal audit certification, ‘Standards are too costly,’‘Not perceived as value added by management/board’ and ‘Inadequate internal audit staff’ that are negatively associated with compliance. The paper ends with a discussion of the implications of these results for practice and research.
International Journal of Auditing – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.