Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Steigen, M. Maeng, R. Wiseth, A. Erglis, I. Kumsārs, I. Narbute, P. Gunnes, J. Mannsverk, O. Meyerdierks, S. Rotevatn, M. Niemelä, K. Kervinen, J. Jensen, A. Galløe, K. Nikus, S. Vikman, J. Ravkilde, S. James, J. Aarøe, A. Ylitalo, S. Helqvist, I. Sjögren, P. Thayssen, K. Virtanen, M. Puhakka, J. Airaksinen, J. Lassen, L. Thuesen (2006)
Randomized Study on Simple Versus Complex Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The Nordic Bifurcation StudyCirculation, 114
M. Zamir, N. Brown (1983)
Internal geometry of arterial bifurcations.Journal of biomechanics, 16 10
J. Ormiston, M. Webster, B. Webber, J. Stewart, P. Ruygrok, R. Hatrick (2008)
The "crush" technique for coronary artery bifurcation stenting: insights from micro-computed tomographic imaging of bench deployments.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 1 4
T. Adriaenssens, R. Byrne, A. Dibra, R. Iijima, J. Mehilli, Olga Bruskina, A. Schömig, A. Kastrati (2008)
Culotte stenting technique in coronary bifurcation disease: angiographic follow-up using dedicated quantitative coronary angiographic analysis and 12-month clinical outcomes.European heart journal, 29 23
V. Džavík, R. Kharbanda, J. Ivanov, D. Ing, S. Bui, K. Mackie, R. Ramsamujh, A. Barolet, L. Schwartz, P. Seidelin (2006)
Predictors of long-term outcome after crush stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: importance of the bifurcation angle.American heart journal, 152 4
T. Lefévre, Y. Louvard, M. Morice, C. Loubeyre, J. Piéchaud, P. Dumas (2001)
Stenting of bifurcation lesions: a rational approach.Journal of interventional cardiology, 14 6
A. Galassi, S. Tomasello, Giorgio Sacchetta, D. Seminara, L. Canonico, C. Tamburino (2008)
The "mini-crush technique" for the treatment of coronary trifurcation lesions.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 4 3
R. Costa, G. Mintz, S. Carlier, A. Lansky, I. Moussa, K. Fujii, Hideo Takebayashi, T. Yasuda, J. Costa, Y. Tsuchiya, L. Jensen, Ecaterina Cristea, R. Mehran, G. Dangas, S. Iyer, M. Collins, E. Kreps, A. Colombo, G. Stone, M. Leon, J. Moses (2005)
Bifurcation coronary lesions treated with the "crush" technique: an intravascular ultrasound analysis.Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 46 4
Y. Louvard, T. Lefévre, M. Morice (2004)
Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary diseaseHeart, 90
Miroslaw Ferenc, M. Gick, Rolf-Peter Kienzle, H. Bestehorn, K. Werner, T. Comberg, P. Kuebler, H. Büttner, F. Neumann (2008)
Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesionsEuropean Heart Journal, 29
A. Colombo, J. Moses, M. Morice, J. Ludwig, D. Holmes, V. Spanos, Y. Louvard, Benny Desmedt, C. Mario, M. Leon (2004)
Randomized Study to Evaluate Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Implanted at Coronary Bifurcation LesionsCirculation: Journal of the American Heart Association, 109
L. Thuesen, H. Kelbaek, L. Kløvgaard, S. Helqvist, E. Jørgensen, Samir Aljabbari, L. Krusell, G. Jensen, H. Bøtker, K. Saunamäki, J. Lassen, A. Weert (2006)
Comparison of sirolimus-eluting and bare metal stents in coronary bifurcation lesions: subgroup analysis of the Stenting Coronary Arteries in Non-Stress/Benestent Disease Trial (SCANDSTENT).American heart journal, 152 6
M. Pan, J. Lezo, A. Medina, M. Romero, J. Segura, D. Pavlovic, A. Delgado, S. Ojeda, F. Melián, Juan Herrador, I. Ureña, Luis Burgos (2004)
Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: a randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy.American heart journal, 148 5
B. Koo, K. Park, Hyun-Jae Kang, Young-Seok Cho, W. Chung, T. Youn, I. Chae, D. Choi, S. Tahk, B. Oh, Young‐Bae Park, Hyo‐Soo Kim (2008)
Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve.European heart journal, 29 6
Dobrin, Vassilev, Robert, Gil (2008)
Changes in coronary bifurcations after stent placement in the main vessel and balloon opening of stent cells: theory and practical verification on a bench-test modelJournal of Geriatric Cardiology, 5
I. Iakovou, L. Ge, A. Colombo (2005)
Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations.Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 46 8
A. Colombo, E. Bramucci, S. Saccá, R. Violini, C. Lettieri, R. Zanini, I. Sheiban, L. Paloscia, E. Grube, J. Schofer, L. Bolognese, M. Orlandi, G. Niccoli, A. Latib, F. Airoldi (2009)
Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) StudyCirculation, 119
Y. Murasato, Y. Hikichi, Masataka Horiuchi (2009)
Examination of stent deformation and gap formation after complex stenting of left main coronary artery bifurcations using microfocus computed tomography.Journal of interventional cardiology, 22 2
Background: The unsatisfactory side branch (SB) ostial strut coverage remains a problem in coronary bifurcation stenting. Both the surplus and lack of struts at SB ostium may be the causative mechanism. We propose that the inability of available stents to cover the “extension distance” of the bifurcation region is the cause of in‐stent restenosis. Methods: The extension distance (ED) is defined as the maximal distance at the carina tip, which must be covered by the stent struts to ensure optimal coverage of the main branch (MB) and SB openings. A mathematical model was created, representing the key factors that govern geometrical reconfigurations after stent implantation in bifurcations. There are two options—with and without bifurcation region deformation. The theoretical assumptions were tested on a bifurcation model (soft polyvinylchloride polymer tubes) permitting free wall deformations and the following parameters: Parent Vessel, MB, SB diameters of 3.5, 3.0, and 2.5 mm, respectively, with an angle of 45° between the MB and SB. After stenting, final KBI with 3.5 mm and 3.0 mm balloons was performed up to 20 atm. Results: After the carina displacement, the ED, which has to be covered, is considerably smaller if the suboptimal result (DS >50%) at the SB ostium is acceptable. The maximal EDs from the bench test measurements are: Vision, Abbott Vascular – 5.62 mm ± 0.04; Liberte, Boston Scientific Corp. – 5.2 mm ± 0.03; Chopin2, Balton – 4.58 mm ± 0.05; Volo, Invatec – 4.41 mm ± 0.04; Driver, Medtronics – 4.39 mm ± 0.04; BxSonic, Cordis, J&J – 4.48 mm ± 0.05. The theoretical maximal ED of the model is 6.91 mm—28–62% larger than actually observed with different stents. Conclusions: The achievement of perfect ostial coverage of the SB is unsatisfactory with most of the currently available stents, especially when poststenting excessive dilation of the ostium of the SB is performed. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:305–318)
Journal of Interventional Cardiology – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.