Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Narendorf, D. Brydon, D. Maria, Kimberly Bender, Kristin Ferguson, H. Hsu, Anamika Barman-Adhikari, Jama Shelton, R. Petering (2020)
System involvement among young adults experiencing homelessness: Characteristics of four system-involved subgroups and relationship to risk outcomesChildren and Youth Services Review, 108
Jerry Kang, Mark Bennett, Devon Carbado, P. Casey, N. Dasgupta, David Faigman, R. Godsil, A. Greenwald, Justin Levinson, Jennifer Mnookin (2012)
Implicit Bias in the CourtroomSocial Science Research Network
Briggs Depew, Ozkan Eren, N. Mocan (2016)
Judges, Juveniles, and In-Group BiasThe Journal of Law and Economics, 60
J. Rosenbaum, Meda Chesney‐Lind (1994)
Appearance and Delinquency: A Research NoteCrime & Delinquency, 40
Kimberly Kempf‐Leonard, Lisa Sample (2000)
Disparity based on sex: Is gender-specific treatment warranted?Justice Quarterly, 17
L. Kern, Judith Harrison, B. Custer, P. Mehta (2018)
Factors That Enhance the Quality of Relationships Between Mentors and Mentees During Check & ConnectBehavioral Disorders, 44
Robert Trevethan (2017)
Intraclass correlation coefficients: clearing the air, extending some cautions, and making some requestsHealth Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 17
G. Bazemore, Lynette Feder (1997)
Judges in the punitive juvenile court: Organizational, career and ideological influences on sanctioning orientationJustice Quarterly, 14
T. Koo, Mae Li (2016)
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.Journal of chiropractic medicine, 15 2
J. Rhodes, R. Reddy, J. Grossman, Judy Lee (2002)
Volunteer Mentoring Relationships With Minority Youth: An Analysis of Same‐ Versus Cross‐Race Matches1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32
Allan Lind, John Thibaut, L. Walker, EA Lind, TR Tyler (1988)
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
J. Goodman-Delahunty (2010)
Four Ingredients: New Recipes for Procedural Justice in Australian PolicingPolicing-an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 4
Robert Neff (2004)
Achieving Justice in Child ProtectionThe Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare
J. Belknap, Kristi Holsinger, Melissa Dunn (1997)
Understanding Incarcerated Girls: The Results of a Focus Group StudyThe Prison Journal, 77
Christopher Salvatore, M. Hiller, B. Samuelson, Jaime Henderson, Elise White (2011)
A Systematic Observational Study of a Juvenile Drug Court JudgeJuvenile and Family Court Journal, 62
JoAnn Lee, M. Courtney, Tracy Harachi, Emiko Tajima (2015)
Labeling and the effect of adolescent legal system involvement on adult outcomes for foster youth aging out of care.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 85 5
T. Tyler
Procedural Justice and the Courts
C. Leaper, Melanie Ayres (2007)
A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Variations in Adults' Language Use: Talkativeness, Affiliative Speech, and Assertive SpeechPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 11
A. Piquero, J. Fagan, E. Mulvey, L. Steinberg, C. Odgers (2005)
DEVELOPMENTAL TRAJECTORIES OF LEGAL SOCIALIZATION AMONG SERIOUS ADOLESCENT OFFENDERS.The Journal of criminal law & criminology, 96 1
E. Gottfried, J. Carbonell, Lauren Miller (2014)
The impact of judge-defendant communication on mental health court outcomes.International journal of law and psychiatry, 37 3
Yan Chen, S. Li (2009)
Group Identity and Social PreferencesThe American Economic Review, 99
D. Mears, Joshua Cochran, Brian Stults, Sarah Greenman, A. Bhati, M. Greenwald (2014)
THE “TRUE” JUVENILE OFFENDER: AGE EFFECTS AND JUVENILE COURT SANCTIONINGCriminology, 52
T. Tyler (2000)
Social Justice: Outcome and ProcedureInternational Journal of Psychology, 35
L. Leve, P. Chamberlain, Hyoun Kim (2015)
Risks, Outcomes, and Evidence-Based Interventions for Girls in the US Juvenile Justice SystemClinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 18
K. Mack, Sharyn Anleu (2010)
Performing Impartiality: Judicial Demeanor and LegitimacyLaw & Social Inquiry, 35
Kathleen Otto, C. Dalbert (2005)
Belief in a just world and its functions for young prisonersJournal of Research in Personality, 39
J. Tatar, Suzanne Kaasa, E. Cauffman (2012)
Perceptions of procedural justice among female offenders: Time does not heal all wounds.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 18
J. Rachlinski, Sheri Johnson, Andrew Wistrich, C. Guthrie (2009)
Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial JudgesNotre Dame Law Review, 84
J. Fagan, T. Tyler (2005)
Legal Socialization of Children and AdolescentsSocial Justice Research, 18
Gianni Ribeiro (2013)
If We Have a Voice, Will We Be Heard? Investigating the Impact of Jury Sentencing Recommendations Using Procedural Justice Theory
D. Marlowe, D. Festinger, Patricia Lee, Karen Dugosh, K. Benasutti (2006)
Matching Judicial Supervision to Clients’ Risk Status in Drug CourtCrime & Delinquency, 52
J. Gibson (1978)
Judges' Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive ModelAmerican Political Science Review, 72
Jr. Sanborn (1996)
Factors Perceived to Affect Delinquent Dispositions in Juvenile Court: Putting the Sentencing Decision into ContextCrime & Delinquency, 42
M. Myers (1988)
SOCIAL BACKGROUND AND THE SENTENCING BEHAVIOR OF JUDGESCriminology, 26
S. Walker (1985)
Racial Minority and Female Employment in Policing: The Implications of “Glacial” ChangeCrime & Delinquency, 31
Emily Gaarder, N. Rodriguez, Marjorie Zatz (2004)
Criers, liars, and manipulators: Probation officers' views of girlsJustice Quarterly, 21
George Bridges, S. Steen (1998)
Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders : Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanismsAmerican Sociological Review, 63
S. Nagel (1961)
Political Party Affiliation and Judges' DecisionsAmerican Political Science Review, 55
Barry Feld (2009)
Violent Girls or Relabeled Status Offenders?Crime & Delinquency, 55
This study examined judge‐juvenile verbal interaction characteristics, demographics, and demographic match at adjudication and their associations with juveniles’ behavioral outcomes. Data were collected from audio recordings of hearings and case files from 86 delinquency cases adjudicated in an urban juvenile court in the Southwestern United States as part of a larger research project involving observable procedural justice. Results suggest that some juvenile, judge, and match characteristics had significant associations with both judge‐juvenile interactions (e.g., length of conversations) and juvenile case outcomes (e.g., fewer continuances). We detail these findings and offer considerations for court practice.
Juvenile and Family Court Journal – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2022
Keywords: juvenile; judge; court; demographics; interactions; outcomes
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.