Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Johnston, G. Magnusson, M. Mazzotta, J. Opaluch (2002)
Combining Economic and Ecological Indicators to Prioritize Salt Marsh Restoration ActionsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84
Robert Mitchell, R. Carson (1989)
Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method
Richard Woodward, Y. Wui (2001)
The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysisEcological Economics, 37
(2005)
Wetlands in Washington State
R. Scarpa, J. Rose (2008)
Design Efficiency for Non-Market Valuation with Choice Modelling: How to Measure it, What to Report and WhyERN: Model Evaluation & Selection (Topic)
Frank Lupi, M. Kaplowitz, J. Hoehn (2002)
The Economic Equivalency of Drained and Restored Wetlands in MichiganAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84
(1991)
Highway construction and wetland loss: mitigation banking programs in the southeastern United States
安川 文明 (2002)
予防歯科プログラムの選考に関する Discrete Choice Analysis, 39
D. Hensher, J. Rose, W. Greene (2005)
Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer
J.K. Horowitz, K.E. McConnell (2002)
A Review of WTA/WTP StudiesAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 44
J. Horowitz, K. McConnell (2000)
A Review of Wta/Wtp StudiesEnvironmental Economics
(2001)
Compensatory Mitigation Policy
Melvin Dubnick (1998)
Army Corps of Engineers
D. Hensher, J. Rose, W. Greene (2005)
Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables
T. Arentze, A. Borgers, H. Timmermans, R. Delmistro (2003)
Transport stated choice responses: effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacyTransportation Research Part E-logistics and Transportation Review, 39
Wiebke Kuklys (2002)
Stated choice methods: analysis and application, Jordan J. Louviere, David A. Hensher and Joffre D. Swait, Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0-521-78830-7Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17
(1966)
A catalogue and computer programme for the design and analysis of symmetric and asymmetric fractional factorial experiments
J. Zinn (1997)
Wetland Mitigation Banking: Status and Prospects
P.C. Boxall, W.L. Adamowicz (2002)
Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approachJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 23
P. Boxall, W. Adamowicz (2002)
Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class ApproachEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 23
R.J. Johnston, G. Magnusson, M.J. Mazzotta, J.J. Opaluch (2002)
Combining economic and ecological indicators to prioritize salt marsh restoration actionsEcological Economics, 84
I. Krinsky, A. Robb (1986)
On Approximating the Statistical Properties of ElasticitiesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 68
Sebastian Caussade, J. Ortúzar, L. Rizzi, D. Hensher (2005)
Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimatesTransportation Research Part B-methodological, 39
D.M. Bauer, N.E. Cyr, S.K. Swallow (2004)
Public preferences for compensatory mitigation of salt marsh losses: a contingent choice of alternativesEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 18
D. Bauer, Nicole Cyr, S. Swallow (2004)
Public Preferences for Compensatory Mitigation of Salt Marsh Losses: a Contingent Choice of AlternativesConservation Biology, 18
Harold Stone (2002)
GRAPHICALLY MODELING STAKEHOLDER VALUES 1JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38
J. Rolfe, J. Bennett (2003)
WTP and WTA in relation to irrigation development in the Fitzroy Basin, Queensland
J. Louviere, D. Hensher, J. Swait (2000)
Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications
T. Laitila (2004)
Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A ManualEcological Economics, 50
T. Granger, T. Hruby, A. McMillan, D. Peters, J. Rubey, D. Sheldon, S. Stanley, E. Stockdale (2005)
Wetlands in Washington State ‐ Volume 2: Guidance for Protecting and Managing WetlandsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
I.J. Bateman, R.T. Carson, B. Day, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, M. Jones‐Lee, G. Loomes, S. Mourato, E. Özdemiroglu, D.W. Pearce, R. Sugden, J. Swanson (2002)
Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: a ManualConservation Biology
Evaluation of off‐site mitigation entails comparison of utility changes between two sites. Choice modelling has been used to identify community willingness to trade‐off attributes for two different types of stream in New Zealand. Estimated utility functions are used to derive marginal rates of substitution and stream attribute part worths which can be used to design or evaluate both on‐site and off‐site mitigation policy. Latent class multinomial logit models identified classes of citizens who valued stream attributes quite differently. Significant differences in values for some attributes on different stream types imply heterogeneous mitigation ratios across environmental attributes.
The Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2008
Keywords: ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.