Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Alchian (1984)
Specificity, specialisation, and coalitionsJournal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 140
J. Bynner, D. Romney (1985)
LISREL for beginners.Canadian Psychology, 26
Lewellen Lewellen, Loderer Loderer, Martin Martin (1987)
Executive compensation and executive incentive problemsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 9
Deegan Deegan (1994)
A review of Australian management remuneration plans: The aims; the components; the potential limitationsAccounting Research Journal, 7
Baiman Baiman (1990)
Agency research in managerial accounting: A second look, AccountingOrganizations and Society, 15
Alchian (1986)
An evolving model of firmsJournal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 142
Stanley Baiman (1990)
AGENCY RESEARCH IN MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING: A SECOND LOOK.Accounting Organizations and Society, 15
Patricia Dechow, Richard Sloan (1991)
Executive incentives and the horizon problem: An empirical investigationJournal of Accounting and Economics, 14
R. Lambert, D. Larcker, Re Verrecchia (1991)
PORTFOLIO CONSIDERATIONS IN VALUING EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATIONJournal of Accounting Research, 29
B. Klein, R. Crawford, A. Alchian (1978)
Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting ProcessThe Journal of Law and Economics, 21
Greg Clinch (1991)
Employee Compensation and Firms' Research and Development ActivityJournal of Accounting Research, 29
Clifford Smith, R. Watts (1982)
Incentive and Tax Effects of Executive Compensation PlansAustralian Journal of Management, 7
M. Aitken, R. Wood (1989)
Employee Stock Ownership Plans: Issues and EvidenceJournal of Industrial Relations, 31
Dechow Dechow, Sloan Sloan (1991)
Executive incentives and the horizon problemJournal of Accounting and Economics, 14
Richard Sloan (1993)
Accounting earnings and top executive compensationJournal of Accounting and Economics, 16
Business Council Bulletin, 31
Wilbur Lewellen, Claudio Loderer, Kenneth Martin (1987)
Executive compensation and executive incentive problems: an empirical analysisJournal of Accounting and Economics, 9
This paper investigates the contractual relationship between the manager and the firm. The results indicate that cross‐sectional variation in the components of management remuneration plans can be explained by variations in the specificity of both the manager's human capital investments and the firm's resources. Where the returns on the firm's resources are relatively more dependent upon (specific to) a particular manager, that manager is more likely to be able to negotiate his/her remuneration. The manager is also more likely to be paid on a long run contingent basis and to be offered deferred forfeitable remuneration. The results also indicate that the greater the firm‐specificity of a manager's human capital investments the greater the likelihood that the manager is offered termination compensation as part of the remuneration package.
Accounting & Finance – Wiley
Published: May 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.