Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. McNair, J. Bennett, D. Hensher (2011)
A comparison of responses to single and repeated discrete choice questionsResource and Energy Economics, 33
R. Baker, B. Ruting (2014)
Environmental Policy Analysis: A Guide to Non‑Market Valuation
J. Rose, S. Hess, M. Bliemer, A. Daly (2009)
The Impact of Varying the Number of Repeated Choice Observations on the Mixed Multinomial Logit Model
D. Ariely, G. Loewenstein, D. Prelec (2006)
The Construction of Preference: “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences
L. Hurwicz (1977)
Studies in Resource Allocation Processes: Optimality and informational efficiency in resource allocation processes
S. Ferrini, R. Scarpa (2007)
Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo studyJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53
D. Hensher, W. Greene (2003)
The Mixed Logit model: The state of practiceTransportation, 30
K. Mazur, J. Bennett (2010)
Framing for incentive compatibility in choice modelling
Z. Sándor, M. Wedel (2001)
Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments Using Managers' Prior BeliefsJournal of Marketing Research, 38
H. Moulin (1994)
Chapter 31 Social choiceHandbook of Game Theory With Economic Applications, 2
A. Gibbard (1973)
Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General ResultEconometrica, 41
Corby Garner, Justin Harper, Tom Howells, Matt Russell, Jon Samuels, Eugene Njinkeu, Ethan Schein, Randy Kinoshita (1997)
Preliminary DRAFT: Not for Citation
Itamar Simonson, A. Tversky (1992)
Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness AversionJournal of Marketing Research, 29
B. McNair, J. Bennett, D. Hensher (2010)
Strategic response to a sequence of discrete choice questions
J. Collins, Christian Vossler (2009)
Incentive compatibility tests of choice experiment value elicitation questionsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58
T. Holmes, K. Boyle (2005)
Dynamic Learning and Context-Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation QuestionsLand Economics, 81
C. Plott (1993)
Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes: the Discovered Preference Hypothesis
W. Greene, D. Hensher, J. Rose (2006)
Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit modelsTransportation Research Part B-methodological, 40
J. Swait, J. Louviere (1993)
The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit ModelsJournal of Marketing Research, 30
P. Samuelson (1954)
The Pure Theory of Public ExpanditureThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 36
M. Bliemer, J. Rose, S. Hess (2008)
Approximation of bayesian efficiency in experimental choice designsJournal of choice modelling, 1
H. Ihli, O. Musshoff (2013)
Understanding the Investment Behavior of Ugandan Smallholder Farmers: An Experimental Analysis
(1977)
Summer workshop of the Econometric Society Paris
Gregory Poe, Jeremy Clark, D. Rondeau, W. Schulze (2002)
Provision Point Mechanisms and Field Validity Tests of Contingent ValuationEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 23
Ariely (2006)
Tom Sawer and the construction of valueJournal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 60
R. Carson, Theodore Groves (2007)
Incentive and informational properties of preference questionsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 37
I. Bateman, B. Day, S. Georgiou, I. Lake (2006)
The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTPEcological Economics, 60
G. Kooten, Emina Krcmar, E. Bulte (2001)
Preference Uncertainty in Non‐Market Valuation: A Fuzzy ApproachMicroeconomics: Decision-Making under Risk & Uncertainty eJournal
D. Hensher, J. Rose (2007)
Development of Commuter and Non-Commuter Mode Choice Models for the Assessment of New Public Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Case StudyTransportation Research Part A-policy and Practice, 41
(2008)
Choice set awareness and ordering effects in discrete choice experiments, Research Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment
J. Louviere, Robert Meyer, David Bunch, Richard Carson, B. Dellaert, W. Hanemann, D. Hensher, Julie Irwin (2000)
Combining sources of preference dataMarketing Letters, 10
M. Satterthwaite (1975)
Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functionsJournal of Economic Theory, 10
P. Wicksteed (1934)
The Common Sense Of Political Economy
David Revelt, K. Train (1998)
Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency LevelReview of Economics and Statistics, 80
(2008)
Econometric analysisPearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
G. Scheufele, J. Bennett (2010)
Ordering effects and strategic response in discrete choice experimentsThe research reports
L. Hurwicz (1977)
On informationally decentralized systems
D. Ariely, G. Loewenstein, D. Prelec (2006)
The Construction of Preference: Tom Sawyer and the Construction of Value
H. Ihli, Brian Chiputwa, O. Musshoff (2013)
Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Matter? Evidence from Rural Uganda
J. Rose, M. Bliemer, D. Hensher, Andrew Collins (2008)
Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternativesTransportation Research Part B-methodological, 42
J. Louviere, T. Eagle (2006)
Confound it! That pesky little scale constant messes up our convenient assumptions
J. Bennett, R. Blamey (2001)
The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation
R. Ready, J. Whitehead, G. Blomquist (1995)
Contingent Valuation When Respondents Are AmbivalentJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29
B. Day, I. Bateman, R. Carson, D. Dupont, J. Louviere, S. Morimoto, R. Scarpa, Paul Wang (2012)
Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studiesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63
Jacinto Braga, C. Starmer (2005)
Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference HypothesisEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 32
D. Hensher, J. Rose, W. Greene (2005)
Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer
A. Kontoleon, M. Yabe (2008)
Latent Market Segmentation Analysis of Choice Experiment Data and Implications for the EU’s GM Labelling Policy?
E. Maskin (1999)
Nash Equilibrium and Welfare OptimalityThe Review of Economic Studies, 66
D. McFadden, K. Train (2000)
MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSEJournal of Applied Econometrics, 15
Ariely (2003)
Coherent arbitrariness: stable demand curves without stable preferencesQuarterly Journal of Economics, 118
K. Train (2000)
Halton Sequences for Mixed Logit
D. McFadden (1972)
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
G. Morrison (2000)
WTP and WTA in repeated trial experiments: Learning or leading?Journal of Economic Psychology, 21
(2007)
Stata Release 10
A. Mas-Colell, M. Whinston, Jerry Green (1995)
Microeconomic Theory
Laila Racevskis, Frank Lupi (2008)
Incentive Compatibility in an Attribute-Based Referendum Model
E. Muller, M. Satterthwaite (1983)
Strategy-Proofness: The Existence of Dominant Strategy Mechanisms
P. Horne (2008)
Use of Choice Experiments in Assessing the Role of Policy Instruments in Social Acceptability of Forest Biodiversity Conservation in Southern Finland
G. Scheufele, J. Bennett (2010)
Ordering effects and response strategies in discrete choice experiments
Jerry Green, J. Laffont, A. Sandmo (1978)
Sampling Approach to the Free-Rider Problem
D. Brownstone, K. Train (1998)
Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patternsJournal of Econometrics, 89
W. Greene (2002)
NLOGIT version 3.0 : reference guide
A. McCartney, Jonelle Cleland (2010)
Choice Experiment Framing and Incentive Compatibility: observations from public focus groupsThe research reports
F. Carlsson, P. Martinsson (2001)
Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the EnvironmentJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41
I. Krinsky, A. Robb (1986)
On Approximating the Statistical Properties of ElasticitiesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 68
W. Greene, D. Hensher (2007)
Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logitTransportation Research Part E-logistics and Transportation Review, 43
J. Swait, W. Adamowicz (2001)
Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer ChoiceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86
(2009)
2006 Census data
D. McFadden (1980)
Econometric Models for Probabilistic Choice Among ProductsThe Journal of Business, 53
(1951)
Social Choice and Individual ValuesWiley, New York
Mikołaj Czajkowski, A. Barczak, Wiktor Budziński, Marek Giergiczny, N. Hanley (2014)
Within- and between- sample tests of preference stability and willingness to pay for forest management
J. Louviere, D. Hensher, J. Swait (2000)
Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications
(2005)
Designing efficient data for stated choice experiments: accounting for socio-dempgraphic and contextual effects in designing stated choice experiments
J. Rose, M. Bliemer (2007)
Stated Preference Experimental Design Strategies, 1
Gregory Poe, Kelly Giraud, J. Loomis (2005)
Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical DistributionsEconometric Modeling: Agriculture
An elicitation format prevalently applied in discrete choice experiments (DCE) is to offer each respondent a sequence of choice tasks containing more than two choice options. However, empirical evidence indicates that repeated choice tasks influence choice outcomes through order effects. The study reported in this article employs a split sample approach based on field surveys to expand the research on effects of repeated‐binary DCE elicitation formats. A single‐binary elicitation format is used as the baseline. Our results indicate that choice outcomes may vary across the single‐binary and repeated‐binary elicitation formats. The choice between the two elicitation formats may imply a trade‐off between decreased choice precision in the single‐binary and order effects that may be explained by strategic misrepresentation of preferences, cost uncertainty effects and reference effects in the repeated‐binary elicitation format.
The Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2013
Keywords: ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.