Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Jolly, S. Yusuf, J. Cairns, K. Niemelä, D. Xavier, P. Widimsky, A. Budaj, M. Niemelä, V. Valentín, B. Lewis, Á. Avezum, P. Steg, S. Rao, P. Gao, Rizwan Afzal, C. Joyner, S. Chrolavicius, S. Mehta (2011)
Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trialThe Lancet, 377
Christiane, Druml, Wolzt, Pleiner (2000)
World Medical Association Declaration of HelsinkiInternational Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine, 14
P. Agostoni, G. Biondi-Zoccai, M. Benedictis, S. Rigattieri, M. Turri, M. Anselmi, C. Vassanelli, Piero Zardini, Y. Louvard, Martial Hamon (2004)
Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 44 2
C. Cooper, Reda El-Shiekh, David Cohen, Linda Blaesing, M. Burket, Asish Basu, J. Moore (1999)
Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison.American heart journal, 138 3 Pt 1
De-an Jia, Yu-jie Zhou, D. Shi, Yu-yang Liu, Jian-long Wang, Xiaoli Liu, Zhi-jian Wang, Shi-Wei Yang, H. Ge, Bin Hu, Zhen-xian Yan, Y. Chen, F. Gao (2010)
Incidence and predictors of radial artery spasm during transradial coronary angiography and intervention.Chinese medical journal, 123 7
JAMA, 310
M. Sanmartin, J. Esparza, Joaquin Moxica, J. Baz, A. Iñiguez-Romo (2005)
Safety and efficacy of a multipurpose coronary angiography strategy using the transradial technique.The Journal of invasive cardiology, 17 11
O. Bertrand, S. Rao, S. Pancholy, S. Jolly, J. Rodés‐Cabau, É. Larose, O. Costerousse, M. Hamon, T. Mann (2010)
Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 3 10
Seong-Man Kim, Dae-Kyeong Kim, D. Kim, Dong-Soo Kim, S. Joo, Jae-Woo Lee (2006)
Novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for both coronary arteries via the right transradial approachThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 22
C. Heiss, J. Balzer, T. Hauffe, S. Hamada, E. Stegemann, T. Koeppel, M. Merx, T. Rassaf, M. Kelm, T. Lauer (2009)
Vascular dysfunction of brachial artery after transradial access for coronary catheterization: impact of smoking and catheter changes.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 2 11
E. Romagnoli, G. Biondi‐Zoccai, A. Sciahbasi, L. Politi, S. Rigattieri, G. Pendenza, F. Summaria, R. Patrizi, A. Borghi, C. Russo, C. Moretti, P. Agostoni, P. Loschiavo, E. Lioy, I. Sheiban, G. Sangiorgi (2012)
Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study.Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 60 24
J. Rondán, Í. Lozano, César Morís, María Martín, P. Avanzas, Emma Suárez (2005)
Cateterismo cardaco por va radial derecha con catter Judkins izquierdo. Estudio prospectivoRevista Espanola De Cardiologia
Y. Louvard, M. Król, M. Pezzano, L. Sheers, J. Piéchaud, C. Marien, R. Bénaim, H. Lardoux, M. Morice (1999)
Feasibility of routine transradial coronary angiography: a single operator's experience.The Journal of invasive cardiology, 11 9
A. Pacchioni, F. Versaci, A. Mugnolo, C. Penzo, D. Nikas, S. Saccá, L. Favero, P. Agostoni, Z. Garami, F. Prati, B. Reimers (2013)
Risk of brain injury during diagnostic coronary angiography: comparison between right and left radial approach.International journal of cardiology, 167 6
A. Pacchioni, A. Mugnolo, C. Penzo, D. Nikas, S. Saccá, P. Agostoni, Z. Garami, F. Versaci, B. Reimers (2014)
Cerebral microembolism during transradial coronary angiography: comparison between single and double catheter strategy.International journal of cardiology, 170 3
S. Hoffman, H. Routledge, R. Lennon, Mohammad Mustafa, C. Rihal, B. Gersh, D. Holmes, R. Gulati (2012)
Procedural factors associated with percutaneous coronary intervention-related ischemic stroke.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 5 2
J. Rondán, Í. Lozano, C. Morís, María Martín, P. Avanzas, E. Suárez (2005)
[Cardiac catheterization via the right radial artery with a Judkins left catheter. A prospective study].Revista espanola de cardiologia, 58 7
R. Ruiz-Salmerón, Ramón Mora, Manuel Vélez-Gimón, J. Ortiz, C. Fernández, B. Vidal, M. Masotti, A. Betriu (2005)
[Radial artery spasm in transradial cardiac catheterization. Assessment of factors related to its occurrence, and of its consequences during follow-up].Revista espanola de cardiologia, 58 5
Objectives To investigate safety and efficacy of left Judkins (JL) catheter as a single multipurpose catheter in transradial coronary angiography (TRA). Background Most operators use standard femoral catheters instead of special multipurpose transradial catheters during TRA. Methods Patients undergoing TRA through right radial artery (RRA) were randomized into single‐catheter approach with JL3.5 and two‐catheter approach with JL3.5 and right Judkins 4.0 catheters. Primary outcome measures were rate of success in selective and stable engagement of both coronary arteries with JL catheter, procedure and fluoroscopy times. Results Of 314 patients enrolled, 206 patients (aged 60.3 ± 12.4 years, 36.9% female) were randomized. JL3.5 was successful in 66.0% of patients as a single catheter. Additional catheter was needed more frequently in single‐catheter group (34 vs. 0.97%, P < 0.001). Single‐catheter approach reduced procedure time significantly (6.7 ± 2.1 vs. 7.9 ± 3.3 minutes, P = 0.002). However on average there was 19.7% relative increase in fluoroscopy time (2.61 ± 1.38 vs. 2.18 ± 1.54 minutes, P = 0.035) with single‐catheter approach. Radial artery spasm tended to develop more frequently in two‐catheter group (22.3 vs. 12.6%, P = 0.067). In nearly half of the patients, procedure had been completed successfully with JL3.5 catheter within a fluoroscopy time similar to that of two‐catheter group. Conclusion In TRA from RRA, JL3.5 catheter can be very effective when dedicated multipurpose catheter is not available. As a single multipurpose catheter, JL works perfectly in nearly half of procedures without prolonging procedure and fluoroscopy times. However insisting on a single‐catheter approach with JL could unnecessarily increase fluoroscopy time and, hence, radiation exposure. (J Interven Cardiol 2016;29:257–264)
Journal of Interventional Cardiology – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.