Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Dixon, Maureen Rimmer (2002)
Dynamic general equilibrium modelling for forecasting and policy : a practical guide and documentation of MONASH
David Adamson, Thilak Mallawaarachchi, J. Quiggin (2007)
Water Use and Salinity in the Murray-Darling Basin: A State-Contingent ModelAgricultural & Natural Resource Economics
P. Dixon, Maureen Rimmer, G. Wittwer (2009)
Modelling the Australian government's buyback scheme with a dynamic multi-regional CGE modelResearch Papers in Economics
Australien (2010)
Australian commodity statistics
(2009)
Value of Agricultural Commodities Produced, Australia
M. Young, J. McColl (2009)
Double Trouble: The Importance of Accounting for and Defining Water Entitlements Consistent with Hydrological RealitiesEnvironmental Economics
Mark Horridge, J. Madden, G. Wittwer (2005)
The impact of the 2002–2003 drought on AustraliaJournal of Policy Modeling, 27
David Adamson, Thilak Mallawaarachchi, J. Quiggin (2005)
Modelling basin level allocation of water in the Murray-Darling Basin in a world of uncertainty, Murray-Darling Program Working Papers WPM05-1, Risk and Sustainable Management Group, 8 February 2005
Survey of water entitlement sellers under the Restoring the Balance in the Murray-Darling Basin Program
(2009a)
Value of Agricultural Commodities Produced, Australia, 2007‐08Environment International
(2010a)
Australian Commodity Statistics 2010Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
(2008)
Agricultural Commodities: Small Area DataAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
(1999)
Economic Assessment of Water Market Reform Using the Water Policy Model. Victorian Department of Natural Resources and the Environment
(2003)
Economic Analysis of Environmental Flow Scenarios in the Murray River System
G. Wittwer, Mark Horridge (2010)
Bringing Regional Detail to a CGE Model using Census DataSpatial Economic Analysis, 5
G. Wittwer, M. Griffith (2012)
The Economic Consequences of a Prolonged Drought in the Southern Murray-Darling Basin
(2006)
DPI Water Policy Model. Economics and Policy Research Branch, Department of Primary Industries
(2012)
The Socio-Economic Implications of the Proposed Basin Plan
Mark Horridge, J. Madden, G. Wittwer (2003)
Using a highly disaggregated multi-regional single-country model to analyse the impacts of the 2002-03 drought on Australia
(2012)
Water resources modelling: a review, in Wittwer, G
N. Hall (2001)
Linear and quadratic models of the southern Murray-Darling basin.Environment international, 27 2-3
(2010b)
Environmentally Sustainable Diversion Limits in the Murray‐Darling Basin: Socioeconomic AnalysisAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
(2011)
Water markets: A downstream perspective
(2011)
Modelling the Economic Effects of the Murray‐Darling Basin PlanEconomic Record
David Adamson, Thilak Mallawaarachchi, J. Quiggin (2009)
Declining Inflows and More Frequent Droughts in the Murray–Darling Basin: Climate Change, Impacts and AdaptationWater Sustainability eJournal
R. Grafton, Qiang Jiang (2011)
Economic Effects of Water Recovery on Irrigated Agriculture in the Murray‐Darling BasinEconometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal
P. Dixon, Maureen Rimmer, G. Wittwer (2011)
Saving the Southern Murray-Darling Basin: The Economic Effects of a Buyback of Irrigation WaterSRPN: Water Supply (Topic)
G. Wittwer, M. Griffith (2011)
Modelling Drought and Recovery in the Southern Murray‐Darling BasinAgricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal
W. McLennan (1999)
Australian national accounts : input-output tables : product details
G. Wittwer (2012)
Economic Modeling of Water: The Australian CGE ExperienceEconomic Modeling of Water
M. Qureshi, J. Connor, M. Kirby, M. Mainuddin (2007)
Economic Assessment of Acquiring Water for Environmental Flows in the Murray BasinEnvironmental Economics
A national plan for water security
Australian Government Response to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Regional Australia Committee Report: Of Drought and Flooding Rains
Policy instruments designed to increase environmental flows in the Murray–Darling Basin are compared using TERM‐H2O, a detailed, dynamic regional CGE model. Voluntary and fully compensated buybacks are much less costly than infrastructure upgrades as a means of obtaining a target volume of environmental water, even during drought, when highly secure water created by infrastructure upgrades is more valuable. As an instrument of regional economic management, infrastructure upgrades are inferior to public spending on health, education and other services in the Basin. For each job created from upgrades, the money spent on services could create between three and four jobs in the Basin.
The Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2013
Keywords: ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.