Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Rao Rao, Mitra Mitra (1988)
Growth and yield of peanuts as a result of shadingJ. Agron. Crop Sci, 160
S. Mitra, M. Ghildiyal (1988)
Photosynthesis and Assimilate Partitioning in Mungbean in Response to Source-Sink AlterationJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 160
M. Gent (1982)
Effect of Defoliation and Depodding on Long Distance Translocation and Yield in Y‐Shaped Soybean Plants 1Crop Science, 22
A. Ciha, W. Brun (1978)
Effect of Pod Removal on Nonstructural Carbohydrate Concentration in Soybean Tissue 1Crop Science, 18
C. Wheeler, I. Henson (1978)
HORMONES IN PLANTS BEARING NITROGEN‐FIXING ROOT NODULES: THE NODULE AS A SOURCE OF CYTOKININS IN ALNUS GLUTINOSA (L.) GAERTN.New Phytologist, 80
L. Rao, B. Mittra (1988)
Growth and Yield of Peanut as Influenced by Degree and Duration of ShadingJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 160
H. Singal, I. Sheoran, Randhir Singh (1986)
Products of photosynthetic 14CO2 fixation and related enzyme activities in fruiting structures of chickpeaPhysiologia Plantarum, 66
D. Fowler (1979)
Selection for Winterhardiness in Wheat. II. Variation within Field Trials 1Crop Science, 19
A. Gordon, G. Ryle, D. Mitchell, K. Lowry, C. Powell (1986)
The Effect of Defoliation on Carbohydrate, Protein and Leghaemoglobin Content of White Clover NodulesAnnals of Botany, 58
Koundal Koundal, Khanna Khanna, Sinha Sinha (1987)
Relationship Relationships of nitrogenase activity to leghemoglobin and sugar content in nodules of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Ind. J. Exp. Biol, 25
N. Saxena, A. Sheldrake (1980)
Physiology of growth, development, and yield of chickpeas in India.
R. Lawn, W. Brun (1974)
Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Soybeans. I. Effect of Photosynthetic Source-Sink Manipulations 1Crop Science, 14
G. Bethlenfalvay, Donald Phillips (1977)
Ontogenetic Interactions between Photosynthesis and Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Legumes.Plant physiology, 60 3
M. Dubois, K. Gilles, J. Hamilton, P. Rebers, F. Smith (1956)
Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related SubstancesAnalytical Chemistry, 28
Studies on source‐sink relationship were conducted in two chickpea varieties Cicer arietinum L. namely, Kabuli (L‐550) and Desi (BG‐256). The primary objective of the present study was to assess the influence of source/sink manipulation by defoliation or deflowering or both on dry matter accumulation in different vegetative parts. Seeds were sown in earthen pots containing sandy loam soils. Plants were raised under normal moisture conditions following recommended agronomic practices. In defoliation treatment all the freshly formed leaves were removed from the onset of flowering until harvest. The leaves formed earlier were kept intact. Removal of flower buds from start of flowering until harvest contributed deflowering treatment. Defoliation and deflowering treatment is a combination of both, whereas untreated plants served as control. Significant differences in dry matter distribution and total soluble sugar (TSS) content as a function of source sink manipulation were observed between the varieties. Defoliation treatment preferentially increased more stem dry weight (DW) in L‐550 and more root and nodule dry weight in BG‐256. In both the varieties deflowering treatment resulted in increased leaf and stem DW. This treatment also resulted in increased root and nodule DW in BG‐256, but only nodule DW in L‐550. When defoliation treatment was combined with deflowering, in both the varieties a decrease in DW in leaf and stem and an increase in DW of root and nodule were observed. Total dry matter content increased 2–3‐fold with deflowering in L‐550 but in Bg‐356 there was no significant increase, indicating a possible role of flowers and reproductive organs in dry matter accumulation. Similar results were obtained even with defoliation, which indicates the major role played by leaves formed before flowering in L‐550, and leaves formed after flowering in BG‐256. Thus, this study suggests variation in the functional role of leaves formed before and after flowering.
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 1994
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.