Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Pallas, Y. Samish (1974)
Photosynthetic Response of Peanut 1Crop Science, 14
H. Nayyar, C. Malik, Parmil Singh, U. Parmar, M. Grewal, S. Kaur (1990)
Diurnal variations in photosynthetic parameters in peanut.Photosynthetica, 24
Shekhar Shekhar (1988)
Effects of varieties, dates of sowing, row spacing and their interaction on yield of sesameSeeds and Farms, 14
Chakraborty Chakraborty (1997)
Effect of date of sowing and irrigation on the diurnal variation in physiological process in the leaf of Indian mustard ( Brassica juncea )J. Oilseed Res., 11
D. Dewey, K. Lu (1959)
A CORRELATION AND PATH COEFFICIENT ANALYSIS OF COMPONENTS OF CRESTED WHEAT GRASS AND SEED PRODUCTIONAgronomy Journal, 51
Although experiments have previously been carried out to determine the optimum sowing time of sesame, very few attempts have been made to determine the effects of macro and micro climatic variation on yield. Thus a field experiment was conducted at the University Research Farm, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani, India on an Entisol (alluvial, sandy loam) in the summer seasons of 1996 and 1997 to assess the effects of macro and micro climatic variations on yield of sesame for various dates of sowing. The number of seeds per capsule of sesame was highest in the crop sown on 19 February, although up to the 18 April sowing there was no significant variation. There was no appreciable variation in thousand‐seed weight with date of sowing. Crops sown on 19 February and 1 March produced statistically similar yields. The average reduction in yield of sesame was 78.5 and 213 %, respectively, for crops sown on 10 February and 28 April, compared with the crop sown on 19 February. The cultivar Rama produced higher yields than B‐67 and Kanke‐1. Ambient temperature above 30 °C up to 100 % flowering had a direct positive effect on sesame yield. Crop exposure to 60–70, 70–80 and 80 % relative humidity up to 100 % flowering had a direct negative effect. Temperature profile at 50 days after emergence (DAE), relative humidity at 60 DAE, and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) at 30 and 40 DAE within the crop canopy had direct positive effects on yield. Regression models suggested that temperature profile and PAR within the crop canopy produced 72 and 35 % variation in yield, respectively.
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science – Wiley
Published: Apr 22, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.