Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Gnep, J. Doyemet, A. Seco, F. Ribeiro, M. Guisnet (1988)
Conversion of light alkanes into aromatic hydrocarbonsApplied Catalysis, 43
P. Dejaifve, J. Védrine, V. Bolis, E. Derouane (1980)
Reaction pathways for the conversion of methanol and olefins on H-ZSM-5 zeoliteJournal of Catalysis, 63
M. Scurrell (1987)
Prospects for the direct conversion of light alkanes to petrochemicalfeedstocks and liquid fuels - a reviewApplied Catalysis, 32
C. Engelen, Jp Wolthuizen, V. Hooff (1985)
Reactions of propane over a bifunctional Pt/H-ZSM-5 catalystApplied Catalysis, 19
Y. Ono (1987)
Transformation of Lower Alkanes into Aromatic Hydrocarbons over ZSM-5 ZeolitesCatalysis Reviews-science and Engineering, 34
N. Chen, T. Yan (1986)
M2 forming - A process for aromatization of light hydrocarbonsIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 25
D. Seddon (1990)
Paraffin oligomerisation to aromaticsCatalysis Today, 6
J. Kanai, N. Kawata (1988)
Aromatization of n-hexane over ZnO/H-ZSM-5 catalystsJournal of Catalysis, 114
C. Querini, N. Fígoli, J. Parera (1989)
Activity and selectivity modifications produced by coke deposition on mono- and bimetallic reforming catalystsApplied Catalysis, 53
T. Mole, J. Anderson, G. Creer (1985)
The reaction of propane over ZSM-5-H and ZSM-5-Zn zeolite catalystsApplied Catalysis, 17
A. Corma, B. Wojciechowski (1985)
The Chemistry of Catalytic CrackingCatalysis Reviews-science and Engineering, 27
Y. Ono, H. Kitagawa, Y. Sendoda (1987)
Transformation of but-1-ene into aromatic hydrocarbons over ZSM-5 zeolitesJournal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, 83
The catalytic behavior of Bi‐impregnated HZSM‐5 zeolites in propylene aromatization and the surface properties of the zeolites were determined by microreactor, XRD, XPS, NH3‐TPD and IR‐TPD. The mechanism of the reaction and the effect of surface properties of the zeolites on the reaction were also investigated. Experimental data showed that Bi‐impregnation made the strength of B‐acid sites decrease, the strength of L‐acid sites and the concentration of both strong B‐acid sites and strong L‐acid sites increase. Bi‐impregnation also induced sub‐strong acid sites. These were the factors that made the aromatic products of the reaction increase. The strong interaction between the impregnant and zeolite surface reached maximum at Bi2O3 = 3.5 wt%. Above this value, covering effect of impregnant caused a decrease of aromatic products.
Chinese Journal of Chemistry – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 1994
Keywords: ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.