Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
General editorâs note: Since inception, IJA has gained greatly from the insightful wisdom of Ian Percy, one of our valued and busy co-editors. Once again we are privileged to carry this article by Ian Percy as an extended Editorial to this issue. There is much here which can be a stimulus to auditing researchers on areas worthy of their investigation in the future, and we commend it to our readers as both important and very readable. We are grateful to Iain Gray for his advice on this piece. issuing âauditing in the twenty ï¬rst centuryâ and âthe audit agendaâ. This work was also used in preparing the framework for the european commissionâs discussion paper on the future role of audit in our society and for the work of IAPC. I comment on public expectations under a number of different headings below: Integrity of information In the ï¬rst place, people who read ï¬nancial statements, expect them to be right. Practitioners and academics might query the use of this word ârightâ. We know ï¬nancial statements cannot be entirely accurate because they are based on judgement. However, the public expectation is that publicly issued statements of ï¬nancial and other information are
International Journal of Auditing – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.