Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Costa‐Gomes Costa‐Gomes, Crawford Crawford (2006)
Cognition and behavior in two person guessing games: an experimental studyAmerican Economic Review, 96
G. Ahuja, Curba Lampert, V. Tandon (2008)
1 Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological InnovationThe Academy of Management Annals, 2
Chander Velu, Sriya Iyer, J. Gair (2012)
A Reason for Unreason: Returns-Based Beliefs in Game TheoryIZA Institute of Labor Economics Discussion Paper Series
(1982)
Comment-Subjective Probability and the Theory of Games: Comments on Kadane and Larkey's PaperManagement Science, 28
(2008)
Assessing innovation metrics
R. McKelvey, T. Palfrey (1995)
Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form GamesGames and Economic Behavior, 10
K. Conner (1988)
Strategies for product cannibalismSouthern Medical Journal, 9
M. Abramowitz, I. Stegun, D. Mcquarrie (1966)
Handbook of Mathematical Functions.American Mathematical Monthly, 73
R. Gilbert, D. Newbery (1982)
Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of MonopolyThe American Economic Review, 72
Haile Haile, Hortacsu Hortacsu, Kosenok Kosenok (2008)
On the empirical content of quantal response equilibriumAmerican Economic Review, 98
T. Bresnahan, Scott Stern, M. Trajtenberg (1996)
Market Segmentation and the Sources of Rents from Innovation: Personal Computers in the Late 1980&Apos;SKauffman: Entrepreneurship Scholars Initiatives (Topic)
(2009)
Rational Decisions
T. Bresnahan, Scott Stern, M. Trajtenberg (1997)
Market Segmentation and the Sources of Rents from Innovation: Personal Computers in the Late 1980sThe RAND Journal of Economics, 28
(1989)
The timing of innovations
J. Huyck, R. Battalio, Richard Beil (1990)
Tacit Coordination Games, Strategic Uncertainty, and Coordination FailureThe American Economic Review, 80
C. Hommes (2006)
Interacting agents in finance, entry written for the New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition, edited by L. Blume and S. Durlauf, Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming 2006Research Papers in Economics
Henderson Henderson (1993)
Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industryThe RAND Journal of Economics, 24
J. Heckman (1981)
Heterogeneity and State Dependence
D. Teece (1993)
Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policyResearch Policy, 15
Adam Brandenburger, Eddie Dekel (1987)
Rationalizability and Correlated EquilibriaEconometrica, 55
H. Chesbrough, R. Rosenbloom (2002)
The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off CompaniesIndustrial and Corporate Change, 11
Rajesh Chandy, Jaideep Prabhu, K. Antia (2003)
What Will the Future Bring? Dominance, Technology Expectations, and Radical InnovationJournal of Marketing, 67
(2003)
Equity Research. IRI data: larger volumes declines in January, Eastman Kodak
J. Pfanzagl, R. Luce (1959)
Individual Choice Behavior
Rabin Rabin (1993)
Incorporating fairness into game theory and economicsAmerican Economic Review, 83
J. Kadane, Patrick Larkey (1982)
Subjective Probability and the Theory of GamesManagement Science, 28
S. Athey, A. Schmutzler (2001)
Investment and Market DominanceThe RAND Journal of Economics, 32
M. Stewart, Wiji Arulampalam (2007)
Simplified Implementation of the Heckman Estimator of the Dynamic Probit Model and a Comparison with Alternative EstimatorsIZA Institute of Labor Economics Discussion Paper Series
John Wilson (1986)
Subjective Probability and the Prisoner's DilemmaManagement Science, 32
Teece Teece (1942)
1986. Profiting from technological innovationResearch Policy, 15
M. Lessnoff (1979)
Capitalism, Socialism and DemocracyPolitical Studies, 27
K. Arrow (1962)
Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
Rajesh Chandy, G. Tellis (2000)
The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product InnovationJournal of Marketing, 64
Colin Camerer (2003)
Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction
J. Lerner (1997)
An Empirical Exploration of a Technology RaceThe RAND Journal of Economics, 28
A. Roth, Francoise Schoumaker (1982)
Expectations and Reputations in Bargaining: An Experimental StudyThe American Economic Review, 73
(2005)
Inertia and incentives: bridging organizational economics and organizational theory
Rios Insua Rios Insua, Rios Rios, Banks Banks (2009)
Adversarial risk analysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 104
Janssen Janssen (2008)
Evolution of cooperation in a one‐shot prisoner's dilemma based on recognition of trustworthy and untrustworthy agentsJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65
Frank Werner, Y. Sotskov (2006)
Mathematics of Economics and Business
Colin Camerer, Teck-Hua Ho, Juin-Kuan Chong (2004)
A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of GamesQuarterly Journal of Economics, 119
Federico Etro (2004)
Innovation by LeadersIO: Productivity
David Banks, F. Petralia, Shouqiang Wang (2011)
Adversarial risk analysis: Borel gamesApplied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 27
R. Nau, K. McCardle (1990)
Coherent behavior in noncooperative gamesJournal of Economic Theory, 50
R. Selten, T. Chmura (2008)
Stationary Concepts for Experimental 2x2 GamesThe American Economic Review, 98
Wilfred Amaldoss, Sanjay Jain (2002)
David vs. Goliath: An Analysis of Asymmetric Mixed-Strategy Games and Experimental EvidenceManag. Sci., 48
Arulampalam Arulampalam, Stewart Stewart (2009)
Simplified implementation of the Heckman estimator of the Dynamic Probit model and a comparison with alternative estimatorsOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71
K. Basu (1990)
On the non-existence of a rationality definition for extensive gamesInternational Journal of Game Theory, 19
(2010)
Strategic and structural uncertainty in games
Hsiao-Chi Chen, J. Friedman, Jacques-François Thisse (1997)
Boundedly Rational Nash Equilibrium: A Probabilistic Choice Approach☆☆☆Games and Economic Behavior, 18
K. Moorthy (1984)
Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line DesignMarketing Science, 3
Philip Haile, Ali Hortaçsu, G. Kosenok (2003)
On the Empirical Content of Quantal Response EquilibriumMicroeconomic Theory eJournal
Miguel Costa-Gomes, V. Crawford (2003)
Cognition and Behavior in Two-Person Guessing Games: An Experimental StudyBehavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal
Published by: American
J. Kadane, Patrick Larkey (1983)
The Confusion of Is and Ought in Game Theoretic ContextsManagement Science, 29
(1962)
Economic welfare allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Nelson R (ed.)
R. Abelson, R. Bradley (1954)
A 2 X 2 Factorial with Paired ComparisonsBiometrics, 10
M. Janssen (2008)
Evolution of cooperation in a one-shot Prisoner's
J. Harsanyi (1973)
Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium pointsInternational Journal of Game Theory, 2
(2008)
Purification. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Durlauf S, Blume L (eds), Second Edition
Walter Smith (1959)
Probability and StatisticsNature, 186
Lerner Lerner (1997)
An empirical explanation of a technological raceRand Journal of Economics, 28
Do dominant or less dominant firms innovate more? There is considerable research on this question, with theoretical studies based on game theory and empirical evidence often divided. We provide a new theory that the decisions that concern strategic choice in innovation may be influenced by expected relative returns. Our approach, which we call the returns‐based beliefs approach, is based upon subjective probabilities. It combines a decision analytic solution concept and Luce's (Individual Choice Behavior, Wiley: New York, 1959) probabilistic choice model. We show that the returns‐based beliefs approach provides support for the thesis that dominant firms invest more in research and development (R&D) within an asymmetric mixed‐strategy game. Consequently, the returns‐based beliefs approach accords better with recent empirical studies of innovation. Using R&D data across a range of industries in the UK from 2001 to 2006, we show that firms’ spending on R&D is related more to their own profitability than to that of their competitors, which is consistent with the returns‐based beliefs approach. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.