Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Janice Chen, Paul Cook, A. Wagner (2015)
Prediction strength modulates responses in human area CA1 to sequence violations.Journal of neurophysiology, 114 2
E Frankó, AM Insausti, E Artacho‐Pérula, R Insausti, C. Chavoix (2014)
Identification of the human medial temporal lobe regions on magnetic resonance images: Human medial temporal lobe landmarks, 35
Janice Chen, R. Olsen, A. Preston, G. Glover, A. Wagner (2011)
Associative retrieval processes in the human medial temporal lobe: hippocampal retrieval success and CA1 mismatch detection.Learning & memory, 18 8
Joyce Lacy, M. Yassa, Shauna Stark, L. Muftuler, C. Stark (2010)
Distinct pattern separation related transfer functions in human CA3/dentate and CA1 revealed using high-resolution fMRI and variable mnemonic similarity.Learning & memory, 18 1
Caren Rotello, E. Heit (2000)
Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processingMemory & Cognition, 28
O. Vinogradova, J. Lisman (2001)
Hippocampus as comparator: Role of the two input and two output systems of the hippocampus in selection and registration of informationHippocampus, 11
B. Avants, N. Tustison, G. Song, P. Cook, A. Klein, J. Gee (2011)
A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registrationNeuroImage, 54
M. Yassa, C. Stark (2011)
Pattern separation in the hippocampusTrends in Neurosciences, 34
D. Wicher (2013)
Sensory receptors—design principles revisitedFrontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 7
(2001)
Memory & Cognition
D. Kumaran, E. Maguire (2007)
Match–Mismatch Processes Underlie Human Hippocampal Responses to Associative NoveltyThe Journal of Neuroscience, 27
D. Amaral (1993)
Emerging principles of intrinsic hippocampal organizationCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 3
JC Liang, AR. Preston (2015)
The Wiley Handbook on the Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory
D. Kumaran, E. Maguire (2006)
An Unexpected Sequence of Events: Mismatch Detection in the Human HippocampusPLoS Biology, 4
(2007)
A guide to calculating percent change with featquery
M Jenkinson, CF Beckmann, TEJ Behrens, MW Woolrich, SM. Smith (2012)
FSL, 62
B. Avants, Paul Yushkevich, J. Pluta, D. Minkoff, M. Korczykowski, J. Detre, J. Gee (2010)
The optimal template effect in hippocampus studies of diseased populationsNeuroImage, 49
R. Kesner (2013)
Role of the hippocampus in mediating interference as measured by pattern separation processesBehavioural Processes, 93
D. Amaral, M. Witter (1989)
The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: A review of anatomical dataNeuroscience, 31
D. Kumaran, E. Maguire (2007)
Which computational mechanisms operate in the hippocampus during novelty detection?Hippocampus, 17
C. Stark, L. Squire (2001)
When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRIProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98
M. Jenkinson, P. Bannister, M. Brady, Stephen Smith (2002)
Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain ImagesNeuroImage, 17
R. Kesner (2013)
A process analysis of the CA3 subregion of the hippocampusFrontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 7
D. Kumaran, E. Maguire (2009)
Novelty signals: a window into hippocampal information processingTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 13
M. Hunsaker, R. Kesner (2013)
The operation of pattern separation and pattern completion processes associated with different attributes or domains of memoryNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37
Valerie Carr, Jesse Rissman, A. Wagner (2010)
Imaging the Human Medial Temporal Lobe with High-Resolution fMRINeuron, 65
Lorena Deuker, Christian Doeller, J. Fell, N. Axmacher (2014)
Human neuroimaging studies on the hippocampal CA3 region – integrating evidence for pattern separation and completionFrontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 8
J. Liang, A. Preston (2015)
Medial Temporal Lobe Subregional Function in Human Episodic Memory
Katherine Duncan, C. Curtis, L. Davachi (2009)
Distinct Memory Signatures in the Hippocampus: Intentional States Distinguish Match and Mismatch Enhancement SignalsThe Journal of Neuroscience, 29
E. Frankó, A. Insausti, E. Artacho-Pérula, R. Insausti, C. Chavoix (2014)
Identification of the human medial temporal lobe regions on magnetic resonance imagesHuman Brain Mapping, 35
Katherine Duncan, Nicholas Ketz, S. Inati, L. Davachi (2012)
Evidence for area CA1 as a match/mismatch detector: A high‐resolution fMRI study of the human hippocampusHippocampus, 22
J. Lisman, A. Grace (2005)
The Hippocampal-VTA Loop: Controlling the Entry of Information into Long-Term MemoryNeuron, 46
H. Duvernoy (1988)
The Human Hippocampus
R. Kesner (2013)
An analysis of the dentate gyrus functionBehavioural Brain Research, 254
N. Dudukovic, A. Preston, J. Archie, G. Glover, A. Wagner (2011)
High-resolution fMRI Reveals Match Enhancement and Attentional Modulation in the Human Medial Temporal LobeJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23
A. Bakker, C. Kirwan, Michael Miller, C. Stark, C. Stark (2008)
Pattern Separation in the Human Hippocampal CA3 and Dentate GyrusScience, 319
E. Lonati, A. Brambilla, C. Milani, M. Masserini, P. Palestini, A. Bulbarelli (2014)
Pin1, a new player in the fate of HIF-1α degradation: an hypothetical mechanism inside vascular damage as Alzheimer’s disease risk factorFrontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 8
J. Leutgeb, S. Leutgeb, A. Treves, R. Meyer, C. Barnes, B. McNaughton, M. Moser, E. Moser (2005)
Progressive Transformation of Hippocampal Neuronal Representations in “Morphed” EnvironmentsNeuron, 48
Deborah Hannula, C. Ranganath (2008)
Medial Temporal Lobe Activity Predicts Successful Relational Memory BindingThe Journal of Neuroscience, 28
When encountering stimuli that vary slightly from previous experiences, neural signals within the CA3 and dentate gyrus (CA3DG) hippocampal subfields are thought to facilitate mnemonic discrimination, whereas CA1 may be less sensitive to minor stimulus changes, allowing for generalization across similar events. Studies have also posited a critical role for CA1 in the comparison of events to memory‐derived expectations, but the degree to which these processes are impacted by explicit retrieval demands is yet unclear. To evaluate extant accounts of hippocampal subfield function, we acquired high‐resolution fMRI data as participants performed a task in which famous names were used to cue the retrieval of previously paired images. Although both left CA3DG and CA1 showed match enhancement effects, responding more to original paired images (targets) than to never‐before‐seen images (novels), the sensitivity of these subfields to stimulus changes and task demands diverged. CA3DG showed a goal‐independent, yet highly specific, preference for previously encountered stimuli, responding equally strongly to targets and mispaired associates, while showing equally weak responses to close lures and novels. In contrast, recognition signals in CA1 were goal‐dependent (i.e., not evoked by mispaired associates), yet accommodating of subtle stimulus differences, such that close lures evoked comparable activity as targets. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Hippocampus – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2017
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.