Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Hay, Quaker Kappel, W. Fenical (1994)
Synergisms in Plant Defenses against Herbivores: Interactions of Chemistry, Calcification, and Plant QualityEcology, 75
C. Raymond (1998)
Role of leaf development and colour change in differential defoliation of Eucalyptus regnans families by the leaf eating beetle Chrysophtharta bimaculata (Olivier)Forest Ecology and Management, 109
J. Donaldson, R. Lindroth (2004)
Cottonwood Leaf Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Performance in Relation to Variable Phytochemistry in Juvenile Aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), 33
L. Fox, B. Macauley (1977)
Insect grazing on Eucalyptus in response to variation in leaf tannins and nitrogenOecologia, 29
Roosa Leimu, Marianna Riipi, D. Staerk (2005)
Food preference and performance of the larvae of a specialist herbivore: variation among and within host-plant populationsActa Oecologica-international Journal of Ecology, 28
M. Berenbaum, A. Zangerl (1993)
Furanocoumarin metabolism in Papilio polyxenes: biochemistry, genetic variability, and ecological significanceOecologia, 95
A. Agrawal, Nile Kurashige (2003)
A Role for Isothiocyanates in Plant Resistance Against the Specialist Herbivore Pieris rapaeJournal of Chemical Ecology, 29
L. Dyer, C. Dodson, J. Stireman, M. Tobler, Angela Smilanich, R. Fincher, D. Letourneau (2003)
Synergistic Effects of Three Piper Amides on Generalist and Specialist HerbivoresJournal of Chemical Ecology, 29
B. Howlett, A. Clarke, J. Madden (2001)
The influence of leaf age on the oviposition preference of Chrysophtharta bimaculata (Olivier) and the establishment of neonatesAgricultural and Forest Entomology, 3
I. Williams (1999)
Slow‐growth, high‐mortality – a general hypothesis, or is it?Ecological Entomology, 24
(2000)
Oviposition site selection in a eucalypt feeding chrysomelid
C. Loader, H. Damman (1991)
Nitrogen Content of Food Plants and Vulnerability of Pieris Rapae to Natural EnemiesEcology, 72
M. Henery, I. Wallis, C. Stone, William Foley (2008)
Methyl jasmonate does not induce changes in Eucalyptus grandis leaves that alter the effect of constitutive defences on larvae of a specialist herbivoreOecologia, 156
S. Pennings, V. Paul (1992)
Effect of Plant Toughness, Calcification, and Chemistry on Herbivory by Dolabella AuriculariaEcology, 73
A. Zangerl, M. Berenbaum (1993)
Plant Chemistry, Insect Adaptations to Plant Chemistry, and Host Plant Utilization PatternsEcology, 74
T. Jong (1995)
Why fast-growing plants do not bother about defenceOikos, 74
B. Moore (1967)
HYDROGEN CYANIDE IN THE DEFENSIVE SECRETIONS OF LARVAL PAROPSINI (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE)Australian Journal of Entomology, 6
B. Tullberg, A. Hunter (1996)
Evolution of larval gregariousness in relation to repellent defences and warning coloration in tree-feeding Macrolepidoptera: a phylogenetic analysis based on independent contrastsBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 57
K. Clancy, P. Price (1987)
Rapid Herbivore Growth Enhances Enemy Attack: Sublethal Plant Defenses Remain a ParadoxEcology, 68
P. Morrow, L. Fox (1980)
Effects of variation in Eucalyptus essential oil yield on insect growth and grazing damageOecologia, 45
G. Guillet, J. Harmatha, T. Waddell, B. Philogéne, J. Arnason (2000)
Symposium-in-Print Synergistic Insecticidal Mode of Action between Sesquiterpene Lactones and a Phototoxin, α-Terthienyl, 71
W. Osburn
The Cottonwood Leaf BeetleTransactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 4
I. Kaplan, Margaret Lynch, G. Dively, R. Denno (2007)
Leafhopper-induced plant resistance enhances predation risk in a phytophagous beetleOecologia, 152
Timothy Craig, Joanne Itami, P. Price (1990)
The window of vulnerability of a shoot-galling sawfly to attack by a parasitoid.Ecology, 71
G. Waldbauer (1968)
The Consumption and Utilization of Food by InsectsAdvances in Insect Physiology, 5
E. Haukioja (2003)
Putting the insect into the birch–insect interactionOecologia, 136
Accepted 5
L. Hummelbrunner, M. Isman (2001)
Acute, sublethal, antifeedant, and synergistic effects of monoterpenoid essential oil compounds on the tobacco cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lep., Noctuidae).Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 49 2
M. Zalucki, S. Malcolm, T. Paine, C. Hanlon, L. Brower, A. Clarke (2001)
It’s the first bites that count: Survival of first‐instar monarchs on milkweedsAustral Ecology, 26
L. Rapley, Gr Allen, B. Potts (2004)
Genetic variation in Eucalyptus globulus in relation to susceptibility from attack by the southern eucalypt leaf beetle, Chrysophtharta agricolaAustralian Journal of Botany, 52
(1996)
Performance of first instar Chrysophtharta bimaculata larvae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on nine families of Eucalyptus regnans (Myrtaceae
T. Osier, R. Lindroth (2001)
Effects of Genotype, Nutrient Availability, and Defoliation on Aspen Phytochemistry and Insect PerformanceJournal of Chemical Ecology, 27
C. Raymond (1995)
Genetic variation in Eucalyptus regnans and Eucalyptus nitens for levels of observed defoliation caused by the Eucalyptus leaf beetle, Chrysophtharta bimaculata Olivier, in TasmaniaForest Ecology and Management, 72
P. Feeny (1976)
Plant apparency and chemical defenseRecent Advances in Phytochemistry, 10
D. Wait, Clive Jones, J. Coleman (1998)
Effects of nitrogen fertilization on leaf chemistry and beetle feeding are mediated by leaf developmentOikos, 82
N. Stamp, T. Osier (1998)
Response of five insect herbivores to multiple allelochemicals under fluctuating temperaturesEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 88
D. Little, J. Madden (1976)
HOST PREFERENCE IN THE TASMANIAN EUCALYPT DEFOLIATING PAROPSINI (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO CHRYSOPHTHARTA BIMACULATA (OLIVIER) AND C. AGRICOLA (CHAPUIS).Australian Journal of Entomology, 14
Marja-Leena Laitinen, R. Julkunen-Tiitto, M. Rousi (2002)
Foliar phenolic composition of European white birch during bud unfolding and leaf development.Physiologia plantarum, 114 3
J. Tuomi (1992)
Toward integration of plant defence theories.Trends in ecology & evolution, 7 11
Steinbauer, Clarke, Madden (1998)
Oviposition preference of a Eucalyptus herbivore and the importance of leaf age on interspecific host choiceEcological Entomology, 23
(1990)
Limits to growth of eucalypts and their biology of production
M. Henery, M. Henson, I. Wallis, C. Stone, W. Foley (2008)
Predicting crown damage to Eucalyptus grandis by Paropsis atomaria with direct and indirect measures of leaf compositionForest Ecology and Management, 255
S. Strauss, P. Morrow (1988)
Movement patterns of an Australian chrysomelid beetle in a stand of two Eucalyptus host speciesOecologia, 77
C. Reid, C. Ohmart (1989)
DETERMINATION OF THE SEX OF PUPAE OF PAROPSZS ATOMARZA OLIVIER, AND RELATED PAROPSINA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE)Australian Journal of Entomology, 28
(1976)
Biochemical Interactions Between Plants and Insects
S. Baker, J. Elek, S. Candy (2002)
Comparison of feeding efficiency, development time and survival of Tasmanian eucalyptus leaf beetle larvae Chrysophtharta bimaculata (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on two hostsAustralian Journal of Entomology, 41
H. Nahrung, P. Dunstan, G. Allen (2001)
Larval gregariousness and neonate establishment of the eucalypt-feeding beetle Chrysophtharta agricola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Paropsini)Oikos, 94
N. Moran, W. Hamilton (1980)
Low Nutritive Quality as Defense Against HerbivoresJournal of Theoretical Biology, 86
D. Herms, W. Mattson (1992)
The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or DefendThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 67
Mirka Macel, M. Bruinsma, Sander Dijkstra, T. Ooijendijk, H. Niemeyer, P. Klinkhamer (2005)
Differences in Effects of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids on Five Generalist Insect Herbivore SpeciesJournal of Chemical Ecology, 31
G. Guillet, J. Harmatha, T. Waddell, B. Philogène, J. Arnason (2000)
Synergistic Insecticidal Mode of Action between Sesquiterpene Lactones and a Phototoxin, α‐TerthienylPhotochemistry and Photobiology, 71
C. Ohmart, J. Thomas, L. Stewart (1987)
NITROGEN, LEAF TOUGHNESS AND THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF PAROPSIS ATOMARIA OLIVIER (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE)—A HYPOTHESISAustralian Journal of Entomology, 26
D. Little, H. Elliott, J. Madden, R. Bashford (1990)
STAGE‐SPECIFIC MORTALITY IN TWO FIELD POPULATIONS OF IMMATURE CHRYSOPHTHARTA BIMACULATA (OLIVIER) (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE)Australian Journal of Entomology, 29
J. Fordyce, A. Shapiro (2003)
Another perspective on the slow-growth/high-mortality hypothesis: Chilling effects on swallowtail larvaeEcology, 84
P. Coley, J. Bryant, F. Chapin (1985)
Resource Availability and Plant Antiherbivore DefenseScience, 230
B. Howlett, A. Clarke (2003)
Role of foliar chemistry versus leaf‐tip morphology in egg‐batch placement by Chrysophtharta bimaculata (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)Australian Journal of Entomology, 42
A. Clarke, M. Zalucki, J. Madden, V. Patel, S. Paterson (1997)
Local dispersion of the Eucalyptus leaf beetle Chrysophtharta bimaculata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and implications for forest protectionJournal of Applied Ecology, 34
P. Carne (1966)
Ecological characteristics of the eucalypt-defoliating chrysomelid Paropsis atomaria Ol.Australian Journal of Zoology, 14
M. Calcagno, J. Coll, J. Lloria, F. Faini, M. Alonso-amelot (2004)
Evaluation of Synergism in the Feeding Deterrence of Some Furanocoumarins on Spodoptera littoralisJournal of Chemical Ecology, 28
1 The influence of six open‐pollinated families (OPFs) of Eucalyptus grandis on both the growth and development of larvae and the oviposition preference of a paropsine chrysomelid (Paropsis atomaria) was investigated. The OPFs had previously been identified as differing in their susceptibility to defoliation by P. atomaria in forestry progeny trials. 2 Oviposition preference for resistant and susceptible foliage was tested using binary choice tests. These tests did not demonstrate any significant preference for either resistant or susceptible open‐pollinated material indicating that adult host preference for susceptible trees was not a likely cause of differential defoliation. 3 Quantification and analysis of growth and development parameters for all larval stages of P. atomaria showed that feeding on genetic material identified as resistant resulted in a significant reduction of relative growth rate of first instar larvae and an alteration to normal feeding behaviour. There was also a trend towards increased larval mortality on resistant E. grandis. 4 We argue that although the magnitude of these effects was minor, interactions with additional biotic and abiotic sources of mortality in the field have the potential, when magnified over successive generations, to result in significant variation in defoliation of host genotypes in the field.
Agricultural and Forest Entomology – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.