Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/developing-a-useful-user-friendly-website-for-cancer-patient-follow-up-WvfS7PQft0
References (31)
-
R. Lewis, R. Neal, N. Williams, B. France, M. Hendry, D. Russell, D. Hughes, I. Russell, N. Stuart, D. Weller, C. Wilkinson (2009)
Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 59 564
-
J. Maddams, D. Brewster, A. Gavin, J. Steward, James Elliott, M. Utley, H. Møller (2009)
Cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom: estimates for 2008British Journal of Cancer, 101
-
P. Helft, R. Eckles, C. Johnson-Calley, C. Daugherty (2005)
Use of the internet to obtain cancer information among cancer patients at an urban county hospital.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 23 22
-
Fred Davis, R. Bagozzi, P. Warshaw (1989)
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical ModelsManagement Science, 35
-
O. Sangha, G. Stucki, M. Liang, A. Fossel, J. Katz (2003)
The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research.Arthritis and rheumatism, 49 2
-
F. García-Lizana, A. Sarría-Santamera (2007)
New technologies for chronic disease management and control: a systematic reviewJournal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 13
-
M. Noble, Gemma Wright, C. Dibben, G. Smith, D. McLennan, C. Anttila, H. Barnes, C. Mokhtar, S. Noble, J. Gardner (2011)
The English indices of deprivation 2004, 180
-
E. Wright, M. Kiely, C. Johnston, A. Smith, A. Cull, P. Selby (2005)
Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess social difficulties in routine oncology practiceQuality of Life Research, 14
-
S. Clauser, E. Wagner, E. Bowles, L. Tuzzio, Sarah Greene (2011)
Improving modern cancer care through information technology.American journal of preventive medicine, 40 5 Suppl 2
-
C. Hill-Kayser, C. Vachani, M. Hampshire, L. Jacobs, J. Metz (2009)
An Internet Tool for Creation of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans for Survivors and Health Care Providers: Design, Implementation, Use and User SatisfactionJournal of Medical Internet Research, 11
-
W. Chou, Benmei Liu, S. Post, B. Hesse (2011)
Health-related Internet use among cancer survivors: data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2003–2008Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 5
-
P. Longley, A. Singleton (2009)
Linking Social Deprivation and Digital Exclusion in EnglandUrban Studies, 46
-
E. Basch, H. Thaler, W. Shi, Sofia Yakren, D. Schrag (2004)
Use of information resources by patients with cancer and their companionsCancer, 100
-
Bush (2004)
What do we mean by Internet access? A framework for health researchersPreventing Chronic Disease, 1
-
P. Rose, E. Watson (2009)
What is the value of routine follow-up after diagnosis and treatment of cancer?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 59 564
-
Fred Davis (1989)
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information TechnologyMIS Q., 13
-
P. Wright, Adam Smith, A. Keding, G. Velikova (2011)
The Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI): development of subscales and scoring guidance for staffPsycho‐Oncology, 20
-
R. Lewis, R. Neal, M. Hendry, B. France, N. Williams, D. Russell, D. Hughes, I. Russell, N. Stuart, D. Weller, C. Wilkinson (2009)
Patients' and healthcare professionals' views of cancer follow-up: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 59 564
-
J. Lea, G. Lockwood, J. Ringash (2005)
Survey of computer use for health topics by patients with head and neck cancerHead & Neck, 27
-
C. Or, B. Karsh (2009)
Review Paper: A Systematic Review of Patient Acceptance of Consumer Health Information TechnologyJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 16 4
-
S. Nettleton, R. Burrows, L. Malley, I. Watt (2004)
Health E-types?Information, Communication & Society, 7
-
R. Holden, B. Karsh (2010)
The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health careJournal of biomedical informatics, 43 1
-
E. Basch, A. Iasonos, A. Barz, A. Culkin, M. Kris, D. Artz, P. Fearn, J. Speakman, Rena Farquhar, H. Scher, M. McCabe, D. Schrag (2007)
Long-term toxicity monitoring via electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 25 34
-
M. Cappiello, R. Cunningham, M. Knobf, D. Erdos (2007)
Breast Cancer SurvivorsClinical Nursing Research, 16
-
M. Trotter, D. Morgan (2008)
Patients' use of the Internet for health related matters: a study of Internet usage in 2000 and 2006Health Informatics Journal, 14
-
C. McHorney, Ware Johne (1993)
The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health ConstructsMedical Care, 31
-
G. Eysenbach (2003)
The Impact of the Internet on Cancer OutcomesCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 53
-
V. Venkatesh, Michael Morris, G. Davis, Fred Davis (2003)
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified ViewInstitutions & Transition Economics: Microeconomic Issues eJournal
-
Jiali Ye, G. Rust, Yvonne Fry-Johnson, H. Strothers (2010)
E-mail in patient-provider communication: a systematic review.Patient education and counseling, 80 2
-
D. Chapman, E. Cox, P. Britton, G. Wishart (2009)
Patient-led breast cancer follow up.Breast, 18 2
-
L. Forbat, G. Hubbard, N. Kearney (2009)
Patient and public involvement: models and muddles.Journal of clinical nursing, 18 18
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- ISSN
- 0961-5423
- eISSN
- 1365-2354
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2012.01357.x
- pmid
- 22533456
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
BARTLETT Y.K., SELBY D.L., NEWSHAM A., KEDING A., FORMAN D., BROWN J., VELIKOVA G. & WRIGHT P. (2012) European Journal of Cancer Care Developing a useful, user‐friendly website for cancer patient follow‐up: users' perspectives on ease of access and usefulness UK cancer survival has improved, leading to an increase in review patients and pressure on clinics. Use of the Internet for information exchange between patients and healthcare staff may provide a useful adjunct or alternative to traditional follow‐up. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a website for use in follow‐up cancer care in terms of usability, feasibility and acceptability. A website was developed and underwent iterative amendment following patient usability testing in focus groups. Patients on follow‐up completed a Computer and Internet Usage Questionnaire. Internet users consented to a randomised crossover study to complete paper and online questionnaires, browse the website and participate in a website evaluation interview. Patient website use was tracked. Usability: Website changes were made following patient testing (n= 21). Patients would have liked a ‘personalized’ website with links to their clinical team, out with the scope of this study. Feasibility: The majority of participants (65%) had Internet access. Age remained a differentiating factor. Acceptability: Final evaluation (n= 103) was positive although many would like to maintain face‐to‐face hospital contact. User involvement in website design can ensure patient needs are met. A website model for follow‐up will suit some patients but others will prefer clinical contact.
Journal
European Journal of Cancer Care – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2012