Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Lonergan (1993)
Impoverishment, Population, and Environmental Degradation: The Case for EquityEnvironmental Conservation, 20
G. Kooten, W. Weisensel, E. Jong (1989)
Estimating the Costs of Soil Erosion in SaskatchewanCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie, 37
Elwin Smith, C. Shaykewich (1990)
The economics of soil erosion and conservation on six soil groupings in Manitoba.Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie, 38
(1989)
`Estimating the costs of soil erosion in Saskatchwan',Canadian
D. Walker (1982)
A Damage Function to Evaluate Erosion Control EconomicsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64
D. Nill, U. Schwertmann, U. Sabel-Koschella, M. Bernhard, J. Breuer (1996)
Soil Erosion by Water in Africa
K. McConnell (1983)
An Economic Model of Soil ConservationAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65
(1961)
Economics of Cropping Systems and Soil Conservation
P. Gretton, U. Salma (1997)
Land degradation: links to agricultural output and profitabilityAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 41
J. Miranowski (1984)
Impacts of Productivity Loss on Crop Production and Management in a Dynamic Economic ModelAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66
Dodo Thampapillai, Jock Anderson (1994)
A Review of the Socio-Economic Analysis of Soil Degradation Problems for Developed and Developing CountriesReview of marketing and agricultural economics, 62
(1987)
`E¡ects of soil erosion on crop production
(1997)
`E¡ect of land degradation on tea productivity in Sri Lanka', article presented to the workshop on land degradation and policy options in Sri Lanka
E. Segarra, Daniel Taylor (1987)
Farm Level Dynamic Analysis of Soil Conservation: An Application to the Piedmont Area of VirginiaJournal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 19
(1997)
Policy and Institutional Reforms and the Environment: The Case of Soil Erosion in Sri Lanka, Discussion Article 35/97
A. Chisholm (1992)
AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE: A SUSTAINABILITY STORY*Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 36
S. Grepperud (1995)
Soil conservation and governmental policies in tropical areas: Does aid worsen the incentives for arresting erosion?Agricultural Economics, 12
H. Clarke (1992)
THE SUPPLY OF NON-DEGRADED AGRICULTURAL LANDAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 36
A. Anandacoomaraswamy, S. Ekanayake, S. Ananthacumaraswamy, A. Chishom, S. Jayasuriya, J. Ascough, D. Flanagan (2001)
Effect of land degradation on tea productivity in Sri Lanka.
(1993)
`Economics of upper catchment management for irrigation development
B. Saliba (1985)
SOIL PRODUCTIVITY AND FARMERS' EROSION CONTROL INCENTIVES--A DYNAMIC MODELING APPROACHWestern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 10
(1997)
`An on-site economic analysis of soil erosion in tea smallholdings in Sri Lanka', unpublished M.Ag
H. Clarke (1992)
The Supply of Nondegraded Agricultural Land
I. Coxhead, S. Jayasuriya (1995)
Trade and Tax Policy Reform and the Environment: The Economics of Soil Erosion in Developing CountriesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77
William Magrath (1989)
The costs of soil erosion on Java : a natural resource accounting approach
H. Gunatilake, P. Abeygunawardena (1993)
An Economic Analysis of Soil Conservation in Tobacco Lands in the Hanguranketha Area of Sri LankaIndian journal of agricultural economics, 48
M. Stocking (1993)
Soil erosion in the Upper Mahaweli Catchment, Sri Lanka.
J. LaFrance (1992)
DO INCREASED COMMODITY PRICES LEAD TO MORE OR LESS SOIL DEGRADATIONAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 36
D. Walker, Douglas You (1986)
The Effect of Technical Progress on Erosion Damage and Economic Incentives for Soil ConservationLand Economics, 62
Tea has been Sri Lanka’s major export earner for several decades. However, soil erosion on tea‐producing land has had considerable on‐site and off‐site effects. This study quantifies soil erosion impacts for smallholder tea farms in Sri Lanka by estimating a yield damage function and an erosion damage function using a subjective elicitation technique. The Mitscherlich‐Spillman type of function was found to yield acceptable results. The study indicates that high rates of soil erosion require earlier adoption of soil conservation measures than do low rates of erosion. Sensitivity analysis shows the optimum year to change to a conservation practice is very sensitive to the discount rate but less sensitive to the cost of production and price of tea.
The Australian Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.