Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/determination-of-differences-in-chilling-susceptibility-of-two-soybean-r8BfkFqY7T
References (21)
-
D. Hume, A. Jackson (1981)
Frost Tolerance in Soybeans1Crop Science, 21
-
Hume Hume, Jackson Jackson (1981)
Frost tolerance of soybeansCrop Sci., 21
-
H. Lichtenthaler, C. Buschmann, U. Rinderle, G. Schmuck (1986)
Application of chlorophyll fluorescence in ecophysiologyRadiation and Environmental Biophysics, 25
-
Bilger Bilger, Schreiber Schreiber (1986)
Energy dependent quenching of dark‐level chlorophyll fluorescence in intact leavesPhotosynth. Res., 10
-
M. Havaux (1987)
Effects of chilling on the redox state of the primary electron acceptor QA of photosystem II in chilling-sensitive and resistant plant speciesPlant Physiology and Biochemistry, 25
-
M. Seddigh, G. Jolliff, J. Orf (1988)
Field Evaluation of Early Maturing Soybean Genotypes for Differential Adaptation to Low Night TemperaturesCrop Science, 28
-
S. Hetherington, G. Öquist (1988)
Monitoring chilling injury: A comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, post‐chilling growth and visible symptoms of injury in Zea maysPhysiologia Plantarum, 72
-
U. Schreiber, W. Bilger (1987)
Rapid assessment of stress effects on plant leaves by chlorophyll fluorescence measurements -
Björrkman Björrkman, Demmig Demmig (1987)
Photon yield of O 2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse originsPlanta, 170
-
Demmig Demmig, Björkman Björkman (1987)
Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence (77 K) and photon yield of O 2 evolution in leaves of higher plantsPlanta, 171
-
T. Sinclair (1980)
Leaf CER from Post-Flowering to Senescence of Field-grown Soybean Cultivars 1Crop Science, 20
-
Larcher Larcher, BODNER BODNER (1987)
Criteria for chilling stress in Saintpaulia ionanthaAngew. Bot., 61
-
W. Butler, M. Kitajima (1975)
Fluorescence quenching in photosystem II of chloroplasts.Biochimica et biophysica acta, 376 1
-
G. Renger, U. Schreiber (1986)
Practical Applications of Fluorometric Methods to Algae and Higher Plant Research -
W. Larcher, G. Neuner (1989)
Cold-induced sudden reversible lowering of in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence after saturating light pulses : a sensitive marker for chilling susceptibility.Plant physiology, 89 3
-
Kamps Kamps, Isleib Isleib, Herner Herner, Sink Sink (1987)
Evaluation of techniques to measure chilling injury in tomatoHort. Sci., 22
-
Holmberg Holmberg (1973)
Soybeans for cool temperature climatesAgr. Hort. Genetica, 31
-
Lichtenthaler Lichtenthaler, Buschmann Buschmann, Rinderele Rinderele, Schmuck Schmuck (1986)
Application of fluorescence in ecophysiologyRadiat. Environm. Biophys., 25
-
Ludlow Ludlow, Wilson Wilson (1971)
Photosynthesis of tropical pasture plants. I. Illuminance, carbon dioxide concentration, leaf temperature and leaf‐air vapour pressure differenceAust. J. biol. Sci., 24
-
M. Sivak, D. Walker (1985)
Chlorophyll a fluorescence: can it shed light on fundamental questions in photosynthetic carbon dioxide fixation?Plant Cell and Environment, 8
-
J. Schmid, E. Keller (1980)
The behavior of three cold-tolerant and a standard soybean variety in relation to the level and the duration of a cold stress.Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 60
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1990 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
- ISSN
- 0931-2250
- eISSN
- 1439-037X
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1990.tb00788.x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Chilling susceptibility of two soybean varieties, i.e. cv. Maple Arrow and cv. Evans, in the vegetative state (V 3.0) was determined by measuring in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence of leaves exposed to low positive temperatures. In the more susceptible variety Maple Arrow quite distinct deviations from the reference fluorescence data are seen at temperatures between 6.5 and 4.8°C, but not until 5.5. to 2.5°C in the variety Evans. Fluorescence characteristics, i.e. the fluorescence decrease Rfd, the appearance of low‐waves, the photochemical quenching coefficient at steady‐state and the initial slope of the non‐photochemical quenching coefficient qNP indicate that the two varieties differ in their susceptibility by about 1‐2°C at this stage of development. Our results suggest that measurement of in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence might serve as a suitable rapid monitoring method of pre‐screening soybean varieties for chilling susceptibility, as required in plant breeding.
Journal
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1990