Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Östrand, O. Anderbrant (2003)
From where are insects recruited? A new model to interpret catches of attractive trapsAgricultural and Forest Entomology, 5
Carly Benefer, M. Knight, J. Ellis, H. Hicks, R. Blackshaw (2012)
Understanding the relationship between adult and larval Agriotes distributions: The effect of sampling method, species identification and abiotic variablesApplied Soil Ecology, 53
E. Macaulay, P. Etheridge, D. Garthwaite, A. Greenway, C. Wall, R. Goodchild (1985)
Prediction of optimum spraying dates against pea moth, Cydia nigricana (F.), using pheromone traps and temperature measurementsCrop Protection, 4
R. Vernon (2004)
A ground-based pheromone trap for monitoring Agriotes lineatus and A. obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae)Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 101
R. Blackshaw, H. Hicks (2013)
Distribution of adult stages of soil insect pests across an agricultural landscapeJournal of Pest Science, 86
R. Vernon, W. Herk, R. Blackshaw, Y. Shimizu, M. Clodius (2014)
Mark–recapture of Agriotes obscurus and Agriotes lineatus with dense arrays of pheromone traps in an undisturbed grassland population reservoirAgricultural and Forest Entomology, 16
G. Reddy, K. Tangtrakulwanich (2014)
Potential Application of Pheromones in Monitoring, Mating Disruption, and Control of Click Beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae)International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014
P. Turchin, Francois Odendaal (1996)
Measuring the effective sampling area of a pheromone trap for monitoring population density of southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)Environmental Entomology, 25
(2017)
Large scale Agriotes spp. click beetle (Elateridae) invasion of crop land from field margin reservoirs
R. Vernon, R. Blackshaw, W. Herk, M. Clodius (2014)
Mass trapping wild Agriotes obscurus and Agriotes lineatus males with pheromone traps in a permanent grassland population reservoirAgricultural and Forest Entomology, 16
R. Vernon, W. Herk (2013)
Wireworms as Pests of Potato
(1999)
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the new Agriotes sex pheromone traps in different European countries
N. Vickers (2018)
Pheromone communication in moths: evolution, behavior, and application Jeremy D. AllisonAnimal Behaviour, 135
P. Witzgall, P. Kirsch, A. Cork (2010)
Sex Pheromones and Their Impact on Pest ManagementJournal of Chemical Ecology, 36
H. Hicks, R. Blackshaw (2008)
Differential responses of three Agriotes click beetle species to pheromone trapsAgricultural and Forest Entomology, 10
M. Traugott, Carly Benefer, R. Blackshaw, W. Herk, R. Vernon (2015)
Biology, ecology, and control of elaterid beetles in agricultural land.Annual review of entomology, 60
M. Tóth (2012)
Pheromones and attractants of click beetles: an overviewJournal of Pest Science, 86
R. Cardé, A. Minks (1995)
CONTROL OF MOTH PESTS BY MATING DISRUPTION: Successes and ConstraintsAnnual Review of Entomology, 40
L. Trepashko, O. Ilyuk (2012)
Pheromone monitoring of click beetles as a basis of elaters harmfulness forecast and sustainable insecticide applicationProgress in Plant Protection, 52
(2013)
Effect of male mass trapping of Agriotes pheromone traps on wireworm abundance and potato tuber damage
Accepted 26
M. Sufyan, D. Neuhoff, L. Furlan (2011)
Assessment of the range of attraction of pheromone traps to Agriotes lineatus and Agriotes obscurusAgricultural and Forest Entomology, 13
M. Tóth, L. Furlan, V. Yatsynin, I. Ujváry, I. Szarukán, Z. Imrei, T. Tolasch, W. Francke, W. Jossi (2003)
Identification of pheromones and optimization of bait composition for click beetle pests (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in Central and Western Europe.Pest management science, 59 4
A study was conducted to determine the attractive range of traps baited with Agriotes obscurus pheromone to male beetles in both still air and wind conditions. This information is crucial for evaluating the potential of mass trapping when aiming to reduce beetle populations. Groups of 10 beetles were released at 14 points spaced 1 m apart along a linear track, at one end of which was a pheromone and wind source. Beetle response to the pheromone and/or wind was recorded 150 s after release and characterized as orienting either towards or away from the pheromone and/or wind source. Data analysis indicated the attraction range of the sex pheromone is <5 m in still air, which is considerably lower than estimates from previous studies and emphasizes the challenge of mass trapping this species in the field. The attraction range increased when there was air flow. Unexpectedly, not all male beetles respond to the pheromone, and beetles are inclined to move downwind even in the presence of pheromone. The latter finding suggests that wind direction may influence beetle dispersal and mate finding in the field. The implications of these results for determining the efficacy of mass trapping as a management approach are discussed.
Agricultural and Forest Entomology – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.