Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Wiebe, K. Espy, D. Charak (2008)
Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. Latent structure.Developmental psychology, 44 2
M. D’Esposito, B. Postle (2007)
The cognitive neuroscience of working memory.Annual review of psychology, 66
J. Lehto, Petri Juujärvi, L. Kooistra, L. Pulkkinen (2003)
Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from childrenBritish Journal of Development Psychology, 21
J. Anguera, J. Boccanfuso, Jean Rintoul, O. Al-Hashimi, F. Faraji, J. Janowich, E. Kong, Y. Larraburo, Camarin Rolle, Eric Johnston, A. Gazzaley (2013)
Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adultsNature, 501
(2011)
Mapping the field of cultural neuroscience
J. Mishra, A. Gazzaley (2015)
Closed-loop cognition: the next frontier arrivesTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 19
A. Miyake, N. Friedman, M. Emerson, A. Witzki, A. Howerter, T. Wager (2000)
The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable AnalysisCognitive Psychology, 41
P. Cantor, D. Osher, Juliette Berg, Lily Steyer, T. Rose (2019)
Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context1Applied Developmental Science, 23
Benjamin Plummer, Brian Galla, A. Finn, Sarah Patrick, David Meketon, J. Leonard, Calvin Goetz, Elizabeth Fernandez-Vina, Sara Bartolino, Rachel White, A. Duckworth (2014)
A Behind-the-Scenes Guide to School-Based Research.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society, 8 1
S. LaConte (2011)
Decoding fMRI brain states in real-timeNeuroImage, 56
C. Blair (2016)
Developmental Science and Executive FunctionCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 25
Since the advent of computers, scientists who study how people learn have been utilizing technology to uncover the cognitive and neural mechanisms of learning. Recent technological advances have allowed learning scientists to move their research out of the lab and into the wild, to investigate how students learn in real‐world environments. However, the move from the lab to the classroom involves a significant shift in strategy, requiring consideration of factors varying from the design of mobile (vs. lab‐based) technology to the recruitment of participants, as well as the contextual variables to account for in the less‐controlled environment of schools. Here I discuss the learnings our group has gleaned from a research program involving over a thousand elementary and middle school students in a longitudinal, multi‐year design that involves technologies for assessment and improving learning in schools.
Mind, Brain, and Education – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.