Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Wimmer, N. Schiller (2002)
Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation-state building, migration and the social sciencesSociology of Power
Shu-Mei Huang (2016)
Can Travelling Mothers Ever Arrive? Articulating Internal and International Migration within a Transnational Perspective of CarePopulation Space and Place, 22
Victoria Lawson (2007)
Geographies of Care and ResponsibilityAnnals of the Association of American Geographers, 97
P. Deshingkar (2006)
Internal Migration, Poverty and Development in Asia: Including the ExcludedIDS Bulletin, 37
J DeWind, J Holdaway (2008b)
Migration and Development within and across Borders: Research and Policy Perspectives on Internal and International Migration
N. Yeates (2012)
Global care chains: a state‐of‐the‐art review and future directions in care transnationalization researchGlobal Networks-a Journal of Transnational Affairs, 12
P. Deshingkar, S. Grimm (2005)
Internal migration and development : a global perspective
Russell King, R. Skeldon (2010)
‘Mind the Gap!’ Integrating Approaches to Internal and International MigrationJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36
D. Newman (2006)
The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our `borderless' worldProgress in Human Geography, 30
A. Findlay, H. Jones, G. Davidson (1998)
Migration transition or migration transformation in the Asian dragon economiesInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22
Soimart Rungmanee (2016)
Unravelling the Dynamics of Border Crossing and Rural‐to‐Rural‐to‐Urban Mobility in the Northeastern Thai–Lao BorderlandsPopulation Space and Place, 22
S Castles, MJ Miller (1998)
The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World
Maureen Hickey (2016)
Modernisation, Migration, and Mobilisation: Relinking Internal and International Migrations in the ‘Migration and Development Nexus’Population Space and Place, 22
Russell King, R. Skeldon, J. Vullnetari (2008)
Internal and international migration: bridging the theoretical divide
S. Castles (2007)
Twenty-First-Century Migration as a Challenge to SociologyJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33
A Adepoju, J Oucho (2006)
Migration in South and Southern Africa
A. Portes (1997)
Immigration Theory for a New Century: Some Problems and Opportunities 1International Migration Review, 31
P Deshingkar, S Grimm (2004)
Voluntary Internal Migration: An Update
R. Skeldon (2006)
Interlinkages between internal and international migration and development in the Asian regionPopulation Space and Place, 12
G. Hugo (2016)
Internal and International Migration in East and Southeast Asia: Exploring the LinkagesPopulation Space and Place, 22
A Fielding (2007)
International Handbook of Urban Policy
B. Xiang (2016)
Beyond Methodological Nationalism and Epistemological Behaviouralism: Drawing Illustrations from Migrations within and from ChinaPopulation Space and Place, 22
Within migration studies, the division or ‘gap’ between internal and international migration research has grown over the past few decades despite growing calls to bring these literatures back into conversation. While distinctions between internal and international migration remain relevant in a world in which states retain the power to shape human movements across scales, this division within migration studies is problematic in light of the increasing complexity of human mobility. Scholars seeking to close the ‘gap’ highlight the common structural drivers of international and internal migration, and note an increasingly myopic focus on international migration overlooking the important economic and social contributions of internal migrants. While in basic alignment with these arguments, the contributions to this special issue focus instead on critically interrogating the relationship between internal and international migration research with the aim of provoking new insights across disciplinary and categorical boundaries. Each of the papers examines migration phenomena occupying the intellectual and empirical space between normative definitions of ‘internal’ and ‘international’ migration in order to relink them methodologically and empirically in contemporary migration research. The contributions included here draw on these migration phenomena that do not fit neatly into normative definitions of ‘internal’ and ‘international’ migration with the aim of not only narrowing or closing the ‘gap’, but of retheorising the relationship between them. The collective focus of this special issue, therefore, is to challenge ontological assumptions of ‘migration’ as a definable object of study and to theorise migration as a co‐constituted and relational process. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Population, Space and Place – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2016
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.