Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Conserving marine biodiversity on the African coast: Implications of a terrestrial perspective

Conserving marine biodiversity on the African coast: Implications of a terrestrial perspective Conservation principles developed for terrestrial habitats are frequently inapplicable in marine situations. This dichotomy arises because of different characteristics of the substratum and the existence of water as a ubiquitous marine dispersal medium. Physical differences are manifest in biological differences including reproductive mode, range requirements and levels of endemism. Marine systems differ further from terrestrial ones in that they have been subject to a very limited anthropogenic fragmentation, in contrast to land where many habitats have become highly fragmented. Estuaries and coral reefs, however, are naturally fragmented and particularly vulnerable because their substrata are strongly influenced by biological processes which are easily disrupted. One of the greatest threats to life in the sea is resource exploitation by man. In Africa, marine conservation is secondary to terrestrial conservation—only four countries in sub‐Saharan Africa have marine reserves. Marine reserves are effective in increasing population sizes of exploited stocks and supplementing stocks in adjacent areas through emigration. They also have the potential to provide recruits to exploited areas. Biogeographic patterns can be used to site marine reserves. We propose a middle/edge arrangement of ‘biodiversity reserves’, linked to biogeographical regions. Such reserves would achieve conservation of both representativeness (middle) and high diversity areas (edge). As a necessary corollary, we also suggest a second tier of reserves which has the specific purpose of improving local yields of exploited species. The sizes of biodiversity reserves should be determined by local habitat heterogeneity. Second‐tier reserves should be designed to maximize their benefit to adjacent areas while minimizing their size. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems Wiley

Conserving marine biodiversity on the African coast: Implications of a terrestrial perspective

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/conserving-marine-biodiversity-on-the-african-coast-implications-of-a-xWOxv0XxM5

References (99)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
ISSN
1052-7613
eISSN
1099-0755
DOI
10.1002/aqc.3270040406
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Conservation principles developed for terrestrial habitats are frequently inapplicable in marine situations. This dichotomy arises because of different characteristics of the substratum and the existence of water as a ubiquitous marine dispersal medium. Physical differences are manifest in biological differences including reproductive mode, range requirements and levels of endemism. Marine systems differ further from terrestrial ones in that they have been subject to a very limited anthropogenic fragmentation, in contrast to land where many habitats have become highly fragmented. Estuaries and coral reefs, however, are naturally fragmented and particularly vulnerable because their substrata are strongly influenced by biological processes which are easily disrupted. One of the greatest threats to life in the sea is resource exploitation by man. In Africa, marine conservation is secondary to terrestrial conservation—only four countries in sub‐Saharan Africa have marine reserves. Marine reserves are effective in increasing population sizes of exploited stocks and supplementing stocks in adjacent areas through emigration. They also have the potential to provide recruits to exploited areas. Biogeographic patterns can be used to site marine reserves. We propose a middle/edge arrangement of ‘biodiversity reserves’, linked to biogeographical regions. Such reserves would achieve conservation of both representativeness (middle) and high diversity areas (edge). As a necessary corollary, we also suggest a second tier of reserves which has the specific purpose of improving local yields of exploited species. The sizes of biodiversity reserves should be determined by local habitat heterogeneity. Second‐tier reserves should be designed to maximize their benefit to adjacent areas while minimizing their size.

Journal

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsWiley

Published: Dec 1, 1994

There are no references for this article.