Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Schanda (1986)
Transport of Radiation
W. Thornton (1998)
How strong metamerism disturbs color spacesColor Research and Application, 23
R. Kuehni (1998)
Testing the standard observer with sensitive toolsColor Research and Application, 23
J. Vos (1978)
Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2° fundamental observerColor Research and Application, 3
Vos Vos (1978)
Colorimetric and photometric properties of a 2° Standard ObserverColor Res Appl, 3
W. Thornton (1992)
Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part I. Introduction. the visual colorimeter‐spectroradiometer. Experimental resultsColor Research and Application, 17
W. Thornton (1999)
Spectral sensitivities of the normal human visual system, color‐matching functions and their principles, and how and why the two sets should coincideColor Research and Application, 24
In our metameric experiment, the colour of a filtered incandescent lamp was matched with the additive mixture of three LEDs in a Lummer–Brodhun‐type visual photometer. Two sets of primaries were used, one had their dominant wavelengths at 467, 533, and 600 nm; the other set had dominant wavelengths at 478, 552, and 635 nm. These values correspond approximately to the characteristic wavelengths of the Prime and Non‐Prime Colour spectral regions defined by W. A. Thornton.1 Both the light of the incandescent lamp and that of the LED clusters were seen monocularly in a centrally divided bipartite field at a visual angle of 2°. The luminance of the matching fields was in the order of 20 cd/m2 to provide sufficient gamut for the LED mixture. Ten young observers with normal colour vision participated in the experiment. The emission spectra of the viewing fields were measured with an array‐type spectroradiometer, and two sets of colour‐matching functions were used to calculate the chromaticity of the matching stimuli: the CIE 1931 standard colorimetric observer and the Judd–Vos modification of the colour‐matching functions. We found that the Judd–Vos modification of the CIE 1931 standard observer represents more accurately the real observers in the evaluation of our results. No systematic differences between the use of the two sets of LEDs were detected in contradiction to Thornton's findings. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 29, 360–364, 2004; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/col.20044
Color Research & Application – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.