Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Comaroff, Simon Roberts (1986)
Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context
N. Peluso, S. Afiff, Noer Rachman (2008)
Claiming the Grounds for Reform: Agrarian and Environmental Movements in IndonesiaJournal of Agrarian Change, 8
A. Casson, K. Obidzinski (2002)
From New Order to Regional Autonomy: Shifting Dynamics of "Illegal" Logging in Kalimantan, IndonesiaWorld Development, 30
S. Howell (2014)
‘No RIGHTS–No REDD’: Some Implications of a Turn Towards Co-BenefitsForum for Development Studies, 41
(2002)
Some questions about violence and decentralization: A preliminary exploration of the case of Indonesia
Anu Lounela (2009)
Contesting Forests and Power : Dispute, Violence and Negotiations
M. Sabogal (2009)
The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of PoliticsJ3ea, 13
B. Malinowski, Kauśalakumāra Rāya (1927)
Crime and Custom in Savage SocietyNature, 119
T. Sikor (2013)
Introduction: Linking ecosystem services with environmental justice
Ingrid Creppell (2007)
On Justification: Economies of WorthPerspectives on Politics, 5
T. Sikor (2010)
Forest justice: towards a new agenda for research and practice?Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 7
M. Dove (2011)
The Banana Tree at the Gate: A History of Marginal Peoples and Global Markets in Borneo
John Rawls (1971)
A Theory of JusticePrinceton Readings in Political Thought
W. Keeler, J. Pemberton (1996)
On the Subject of "Java."The Journal of Asian Studies, 55
W. Sunderlin, Anne Larson, A. Duchelle, I. Resosudarmo, T. Huynh, A. Awono, T. Dokken (2014)
How are REDD+ Proponents Addressing Tenure Problems? Evidence from Brazil, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, and VietnamWorld Development, 55
Erik Olbrei, Stephen Howes (2012)
A Very Real and Practical Contribution? - Lessons from the Kalimantan Forests and Climate PartnershipSustainability & Economics eJournal
T. Yarrow (2006)
:Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection
S. Merry (1992)
Anthropology, Law and Transnational ProcessesAnnual Review of Anthropology, 21
L. Bakker, J. Timmer (2014)
Justice in Indonesia: The Social Life of a Momentous ConceptThe Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 15
(2001)
Take the money or die
Sally Moore (1978)
Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach
A. Lukasiewicz (2014)
The justices and injustices of ecosystem servicesAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management, 21
Bernhard Platzdasch (2010)
Localising Power in Post-authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia PerspectiveJournal of Contemporary Asia, 41
Richard Abel, John Comaroff, S. Roberts (1983)
Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African ContextAmerican Journal of Comparative Law, 31
A. Schiller (1996)
An "Old" Religion in "New Order" Indonesia: Notes on Ethnicity and Religious AffiliationSociology of Religion, 57
J. McCarthy (2007)
Sold down the river: Renegotiating public power over nature in Central Kalimantan
Luc Boltanski, L. Thevenot (1999)
The Sociology of Critical CapacityEuropean Journal of Social Theory, 2
N. Peluso (2012)
What's nature got to do with it? A situated historical perspective on socio-natural commodities.Development and change, 43 1
D. Graeber (2001)
Toward an anthropological theory of value: the false coin of our own dreams
(2011)
Introduction to ‘Anarchic Solidarity
H. Nordholt (2003)
`Renegotiating boundaries. Access, agency and identity in post-Suharto Indonesia?European Journal of Social Psychology
M. Goldman (2008)
What's Nature Got to Do with It?Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 37
V. Hadiz (2004)
Decentralization and Democracy in Indonesia: A Critique of Neo‐Institutionalist PerspectivesDevelopment and Change, 35
(2009)
Analysis of local livelihoods from past to present in the Central Kalimantan ex-mega rice project area
Simon Roberts (1981)
Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology
S. Howell (2013)
Divide and Rule: Nature and Society in a Global Forest Programme
D. Henley, J. Davidson (2008)
In the Name of Adat: Regional Perspectives on Reform, Tradition, and Democracy in Indonesia1Modern Asian Studies, 42
L. Liwei, Subhrendu Pattanayak, E. Sills, W. Sunderlin (2012)
Site selection for forest carbon projects
J. Bowen (2003)
Islam, Law, and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning
Richard Nicholson (1992)
Divide and rule.The Hastings Center report, 22 4
P. Wade (2010)
Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, RedesAmericas, 90
(2001)
Decentralization and forest management in Kapuas District, Central Kalimantan. Case Studies on decentralization and forests in Indonesia
J. McCarthy (2004)
Changing to Gray: Decentralization and the Emergence of Volatile Socio-Legal Configurations in Central Kalimantan, IndonesiaWorld Development, 32
(2013)
Partisipasi masyarakat local dalam program DA-REDD+. Studi kasus di desa Mantangai Hulu, Kecamatan Mantangai, Kabupaten Kapuas, Propinsi Kalimantan Tengah
C. Duncan (2007)
Mixed Outcomes: The Impact of Regional Autonomy and Decentralization on Indigenous Ethnic Minorities in IndonesiaDevelopment and Change, 38
Ronald Lukens-Bull, A. Schiller (1998)
Small Sacrifices: Religious Change and Cultural Identity among the Ngaju of IndonesiaReview of Religious Research, 40
Schulte‐Nordholt Schulte‐Nordholt (2003)
Renegotiating boundaries; Access, agency and identity in post‐Suharto IndonesiaBijdragen tot de Taal‐, Land‐ en Volkenkunde, 159
In 2010, the province of Central Kalimantan in Indonesia was established as a Climate Change pilot province to reduce emissions from deforestation and through peat land forest rehabilitation. Today, international agencies, carbon traders, local and national governments, non‐governmental organisations, and local populations have participated in debates and disputes over the establishment of carbon forests and forest protection areas in Central Kalimantan. One such scheme, promoted by the government of Australia (Kalimantan Forest and Climate Partnership), intended to establish a REDD+ pilot project within an area that covers about 120 000 hectares in Kuala Kapuas in Central Kalimantan, the field location of this research. This specific dispute offers a case study based on ethnographic research that helps to illustrate how widespread climate change debates and disputes become embedded at local and national levels in Indonesia. The dispute over REDD+ will be discussed within a framework of dispute theories which focus on moments of crisis, wherein participants must present arguments and justify their actions and theories of justice. The article shows that competing and conflicting conceptions of justice that emerge in the dispute may bring to a halt a climate change pilot project in the locality.
Asia Pacific Viewpoint – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.