Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Chapter 8 Glenn A. Black and the Problems of Objectification in Big Site‐Big Science Legacy Archaeology

Chapter 8 Glenn A. Black and the Problems of Objectification in Big Site‐Big Science Legacy... Large‐scale excavations in the first half of the twentieth century conducted by Glenn A. Black at Angel Mounds were viewed as moving archaeology away from its antiquarian roots toward legitimate scientific practice. Although this transformation led to innovative field methods, amassed collections of unprecedented size and depth, and created foundational archaeological programs and knowledge, the past and the peoples who occupied it became increasingly objectified and marginalized. How did archaeological practice on such an expansive scale remove from history the people whose heritage is memorialized at a national historic landmark? And how has this history impacted archaeological practice today? To address these questions, I draw on personal letters and published accounts for insights into the interests and problematic aspects of Black's archaeological practices before turning to a consideration of some present‐day continuities, challenges, and ways forward. The issues and biases revealed in the case of Black's early 20th century archaeological praxis are not unique for the time. Nonetheless, underlying problems of objectification and racism challenge us to not only confront legacy biases and the harm they have caused, but to work toward ethical ways to use such collections now and in the future. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association Wiley

Chapter 8 Glenn A. Black and the Problems of Objectification in Big Site‐Big Science Legacy Archaeology

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/chapter-8-glenn-a-black-and-the-problems-of-objectification-in-big-e0CzUT10Cy

References (55)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2023 American Anthropological Association.
ISSN
1551-823X
eISSN
1551-8248
DOI
10.1111/apaa.12175
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Large‐scale excavations in the first half of the twentieth century conducted by Glenn A. Black at Angel Mounds were viewed as moving archaeology away from its antiquarian roots toward legitimate scientific practice. Although this transformation led to innovative field methods, amassed collections of unprecedented size and depth, and created foundational archaeological programs and knowledge, the past and the peoples who occupied it became increasingly objectified and marginalized. How did archaeological practice on such an expansive scale remove from history the people whose heritage is memorialized at a national historic landmark? And how has this history impacted archaeological practice today? To address these questions, I draw on personal letters and published accounts for insights into the interests and problematic aspects of Black's archaeological practices before turning to a consideration of some present‐day continuities, challenges, and ways forward. The issues and biases revealed in the case of Black's early 20th century archaeological praxis are not unique for the time. Nonetheless, underlying problems of objectification and racism challenge us to not only confront legacy biases and the harm they have caused, but to work toward ethical ways to use such collections now and in the future.

Journal

Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association – Wiley

Published: Jul 1, 2023

Keywords: Angel Mounds; Glenn A. Black; Objectification; WPA archaeology; Midwest Archaeology

There are no references for this article.