Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
John Norder, Uzma Rizvi (2008)
Reassessing the present for an archaeology of the future: equity, diversty and changeThe SAA archaeological record, 8
M. Blakey (2020)
Archaeology under the Blinding Light of RaceCurrent Anthropology, 61
José E. Martínez‐Reyes (2016)
Moral Ecology of a Forest: The Nature Industry and Maya Post?Conservation
Suzan Shown Harjo (2018)
Speaking of Indigenous Politics
(2017)
Plundered Skulls and Stolen Spirits
Bruce G. Trigger (2006)
A History of Archaeological Thought
Whitney. Battle‐Baptiste (2011)
Black Feminist Archaeology
S. Atalay (2019)
Community-Based Archaeology
(2020)
Anti‐Racist Archaeology: Your Time is Now
Nedra Lee (2019)
Boarding: Black Women in Nantucket Generating Income and Building CommunityTransforming Anthropology, 27
Tim. Sieber (2016)
Putting Anthropological Skills to Use in Engagement with Grassroots Community Organizations1, 38
Stephen A. Mrozowski, D. Rae Gould (2019)
Building Histories That Have Futures: The Benefits of Collaborative Research, 15
Sara L. Gonzalez, Ian Kretzler, Briece Edwards (2018)
Imagining Indigenous and Archaeological Futures: Building Capacity with the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, 14
Alison. Wylie (2015)
Objectivity in Science
Stephen W. Silliman, Thomas J. Ferguson (2010)
Voices in American Archaeology
Rosalyn. Negrón (2011)
Ethnic Identification among Urban Latinos: Language & Flexibility. The New Americans
John Norder, Uzma Z. Rizvi (2008)
Reassessing the Present for an Archaeology of the Future, 8
Ryan J. Wheeler, Bonnie Newsom (2023)
Sins of Our Ancestors and of Ourselves: Confronting Archaeological Legacies, 34
Laura Heath-Stout (2020)
Guest Editorial Introduction: Gender, Equity, and the Peer Review Process at the Journal of Field ArchaeologyJournal of Field Archaeology, 45
Cheryl J. LaRoche, Michael L. Blakey (1997)
Seizing Intellectual Power: The Dialogue at the New York African Burial Ground, 31
D. Landon (2018)
Turtle Feasts and the Commensal Politics of Food: Teasing Out the Flavors of African-American Foodways in New EnglandJournal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage, 7
Maria Franklin, Justin P. Dunnavant, Ayana Omilade Flewellen, Alicia Odewale (2020)
The Future is Now: Archaeology and the Eradication of Anti?Blackness, 24
Marta. Tienda (2013)
Diversity ? Inclusion: Promoting Integration in Higher Education, 42
Christopher Fung (2000)
THE DRINKS ARE ON US: RITUAL, SOCIAL STATUS, AND PRACTICE IN DAWENKOU BURIALS, NORTH CHINAJournal of East Asian Archaeology, 2
Sonya. Atalay (2008)
The National Museum of the American Indian: Critical Conversations
Heather B. Trigg (2020)
Spanish?Pueblo Interactions in New Mexico's Seventeenth?Century Spanish Households: Negotiations of Knowledge and Power in Practice, 24
J. Cedric Woods (2019)
Changing Faces of Greater Boston
Kelly N. Fong (2020)
Chinese Diaspora Archaeology in North America
Pamela A. Hays (1996)
Addressing the Complexities of Culture and Gender in Counseling, 74
P. Hays (2007)
Addressing Cultural Complexities in Practice: Assessment, Diagnosis, and Therapy
(2016)
Towards an Inclusive Queer Archaeology: An Overview and Introduction
P. Brunache (2019)
Mainstreaming African Diasporic Foodways When Academia Is Not EnoughTransforming Anthropology, 27
Garland E. Allen (1997)
The Social and Economic Origins of Genetic Determinism: A Case History of the American Eugenics Movement, 1900?1940 and Its Lessons for Today, 99
Marjolijn. Kok (2011)
Diversity in Archaeology Past & Present.?
Chip Colwell (2017)
Plundered Skulls and Stolen Spirits: Inside the Fight to Reclaim Native America's Culture
Stephen W. Silliman, Katherine H. Sebastian Dring (2008)
Collaborating at the Trowel's Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology
Alicia Odewale, Justin Dunnavant, Ayana Flewellen, Alexandra Jones (2018)
Archaeology for the Next Generation, 59
P. Addo (2017)
‘Is It Entrepreneurship, or Is It Survival?’: Gender, Community, and Innovation in Boston’s Black Immigrant Micro-Enterprise Spaces, 7
M. Tienda (2013)
Diversity ≠ InclusionEducational Researcher, 42
C. Cipolla, J. Quinn, Jay Levy (2018)
THEORY IN COLLABORATIVE INDIGENOUS ARCHAEOLOGY: INSIGHTS FROM MOHEGANAmerican Antiquity, 84
Justin P. Dunnavant, Ayana Omilade Flewellen, Maria Franklin, Alexandra Jones, Alicia Odewale, Tsione Wolde‐Michael (2020)
Archaeology in the time of Black Lives Matter.? Columbia's Center for Archaeology, the Society of Black Archaeologists, and the Theoretical Archaeology Group
Sonya. Atalay (2012)
Community?Based Archaeology: Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities
Daniel Moreno (2018)
Collaborative Archaeology to Revitalize an Afro-Ecuadorian Cemetery, 7
Dorothy T. Lippert (2008)
Opening Archaeology: Repatriation's Impact on Contemporary Research and Practice
Racism, microaggressions, sexism, gendered, financial, ableism, and many more facets of discrimination are legacies still prevalent within the field of archaeology, perpetuating an environment of exclusion. Graduate students are particularly cognizant of the ways in which exclusion impacts their academic experiences and their choices to continue pursuing archaeology professionally and academically. Despite the rise of critical and collaborative approaches to the historical archaeologies of Indigeneity, the African Diaspora, and more, graduate programs often do not critically examine the historical and structural elements preventing an inclusive environment when courting students of visibly diverse backgrounds. There is a pragmatic disconnect between institutional discussions surrounding diversity and the tangible outcomes of these discussions at a grassroots level. Through the creation of the Community, Anti‐Racist, Respect, Engagement (CARE) Inclusivity Committee, conversations among the student body in an interdisciplinary, community‐centered, and collaborative historical archaeology graduate program have begun to address problems with exclusion and identify ways in which inclusion can be furthered. This chapter outlines the process and methodology used in the creation of the CARE Inclusivity Committee and subsequent workshop and offers thoughtful reflection about the effectiveness of grassroots organization at the graduate student level in advocating for change. CARE aims to create safe spaces where uncomfortable conversations are encouraged, to help both students and faculty acknowledge the different levels of exclusion. The goal is not only to foster an inclusive environment, but to create a sustainable process for future cohorts and empower other graduate students to enact tangible change.
Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2023
Keywords: collaborative approaches; diversity; exclusion; graduate school; inclusion
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.