Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Broad‐scale habitat classification variables predict maximum local abundance for native but not non‐native trout in New York streams

Broad‐scale habitat classification variables predict maximum local abundance for native but not... Predicting species distributions at the landscape level has many applications in fish ecology, management, and conservation, yet generating accurate predictions remains a challenge to fish ecologists. Areas of the landscape with higher environmental suitability should have higher relative abundance, although the predictive capability of this relationship might be limited because environmental suitability ignores other factors such as biotic interactions and stochastic events. These factors could contribute to a species being absent or at low abundance in a site with high environmental suitability. Owing to the potential influence of non‐environmental and stochastic factors on relative abundance, modelled environmental suitability should be a better predictor of maximum abundance (i.e. the ceiling of scattered data) than mean relative abundance because ecosystem complexities often preclude a simple monotonic response. To evaluate this assumption, environmental suitability was predicted for 55 944 stream reaches in New York State using native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and non‐native brown trout (Salmo trutta) occurrence data and a suite of four broad‐scale habitat factors. Estimates of suitability were then used to test the relationship with the upper limits of abundance using quantile regression. As predicted, there was a significant positive relationship with maximum abundance for native brook trout at the upper quantiles; however, this relationship did not extend to non‐native brown trout. These findings indicate that broad‐scale habitat factors can predict maximum abundance of a native stream‐dwelling trout and produced environmental suitability maps that could be useful for brook trout conservation. These findings could be used to predict trout occurrence in unsurveyed stream reaches with the highest abundance limits, which could be used to set conservation priorities and provide benchmarks of habitat potential for monitoring programmes as well as identify threats to environmental suitability from anthropogenic sources. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems Wiley

Broad‐scale habitat classification variables predict maximum local abundance for native but not non‐native trout in New York streams

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/broad-scale-habitat-classification-variables-predict-maximum-local-bHYXG7cVKN

References (38)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN
1052-7613
eISSN
1099-0755
DOI
10.1002/aqc.2476
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Predicting species distributions at the landscape level has many applications in fish ecology, management, and conservation, yet generating accurate predictions remains a challenge to fish ecologists. Areas of the landscape with higher environmental suitability should have higher relative abundance, although the predictive capability of this relationship might be limited because environmental suitability ignores other factors such as biotic interactions and stochastic events. These factors could contribute to a species being absent or at low abundance in a site with high environmental suitability. Owing to the potential influence of non‐environmental and stochastic factors on relative abundance, modelled environmental suitability should be a better predictor of maximum abundance (i.e. the ceiling of scattered data) than mean relative abundance because ecosystem complexities often preclude a simple monotonic response. To evaluate this assumption, environmental suitability was predicted for 55 944 stream reaches in New York State using native brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and non‐native brown trout (Salmo trutta) occurrence data and a suite of four broad‐scale habitat factors. Estimates of suitability were then used to test the relationship with the upper limits of abundance using quantile regression. As predicted, there was a significant positive relationship with maximum abundance for native brook trout at the upper quantiles; however, this relationship did not extend to non‐native brown trout. These findings indicate that broad‐scale habitat factors can predict maximum abundance of a native stream‐dwelling trout and produced environmental suitability maps that could be useful for brook trout conservation. These findings could be used to predict trout occurrence in unsurveyed stream reaches with the highest abundance limits, which could be used to set conservation priorities and provide benchmarks of habitat potential for monitoring programmes as well as identify threats to environmental suitability from anthropogenic sources. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Journal

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsWiley

Published: Feb 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.