Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Acta hydrochim. hydrobiol. 17 (1989) 4, 406 Buchbesprechung BRAUKMANN, U. : Zoozonologische und srrprobiologische Beitriige zu einer allgemeinen regionalen Baehtypologie. - A4rch. HydrobiolJErgebn. Limnol. 26 (1987), 1-365, Stuttgart, E. Schweizer- bart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Broschiert , Preis nicht angegeben The booklet “Zoocoenological and saprobiological contributions to a general regional typology of brooks” has 78 tables and 113 figures. During 1980 ... 1982 the authorperfected very detailed investigations of benthic macroinvertebrates and macrophytes in 120 brooks in 9 different areas of the FRG. He paid attention to natural regional differences of the high mountain, mountain and flatland brooks, t.o t.he climatic, geologica,l and hydrological features and achieved a synthe- tic view. He found 550 taxa (inclusive of 409 ones identified in species) of the zoobenthon and evaluated them with respect to qualitative and in most ca.ses also t,o quantitative differences in the regional brook-types, based on natural standing-stocks of macrophytes and macrozoobenthic communi- t’ies. He succeeded in the definition of structural and type-specific differences of the macroinver- tebrate communities of various brook-types for the practice of the ecological-biocoenotical assess- ment of the water quality. The most important taxa were divided into 4 groups: 1) typical high-mountain, 2) high-moun- tain/monntain, 3) flatland and 4) wide-spread forms. The author distinguished 6 geochemical- altitudinal brook-types and named each community according to 2 ... 3 species (or genera) being most characteristic. He made a cluster analysis of the choriotope types classified by substrates (grain size, type and structure of organic sediments and macrophytes as substrates for macro- zoobenthos). Lotic choriocoenoses showed greater regional differences than lenitic ones. In flat- land brooks with low current velocity there was found a higher number of species and individuals than in the lotic stretches. A greater diversity of tnxa was proved in high-mountain and mountain brooks than in the lowland ones. There mas made a saprobiological analysis using the 10-point-system of ZELINKA and MARVAN and the saprobic index by PANTLE and BUCK. Unpolluted brooks clearly indicated current and substrate-dependent structural differences in the species composition. Consequently, different “basic saprobic levels” were defined for these various brook types. In the absence of the effects of sewage the partial saprobic valencies shifted from xenosaprobic to beta-mesosaprobic range from high-mount,ain to flatland brooks. The average saprobic index showed a.n about one degree lower value in high mountain brooks than in flatland ones. The author concluded that in int.erpret.ing a,nd judging the pojlution of running waters t’he im- portance of the respective brook type and its specific basic saprobic level must be stressed. A table of the indicat,ors found in the areas under invest,igation comprised the saprohic valency, indicative weight of species, individual saprobic index and, as it new achievement, it rrniark about the geo-/phytophilous series as follows: 1) lotic: large to medium-sized stones, epilithic moss and algae in very fast to fast currents; 2) lotic: medium-sized to small stones, coarsc gravel, floating macrophytes in high to moderate current velocities; 3) lenitic: fine gravel, sand and coarse detritus, branches and leaves in moderate t,o lorn current velocitics; 4) lenitic: fine det,ritus, sand, silt, marginal ;Iqiia.tir vegetation in low to very low current velocities. The excellent booklet is very rich in facts and ideas and it. is t’he most important coiitrihut~ion to the water quality in running waters for the last decennium. v. SLkDE6EIL
Acta hydrochimica et hydrobiologica – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1989
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.