Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

ARE PROJECT FINANCE LOANS DIFFERENT FROM OTHER SYNDICATED CREDITS?

ARE PROJECT FINANCE LOANS DIFFERENT FROM OTHER SYNDICATED CREDITS? This paper provides the first full‐length empirical analysis of project finance, which is defined as “limited or non‐recourse financing of a newly to be developed project through the establishment of a vehicle company.” The article compares the characteristics of a sample of 4,956 project finance loans (worth $634 billion) to comparable samples of non‐project finance loans, all of which are drawn from a comprehensive sample of 90,784 syndicated loans (worth $13.2 trillion) booked on international capital markets since 1980. The authors find that project finance (PF) loans differ significantly from non‐project finance loans in that PF loans have a longer average maturity, are more likely to have third‐party guarantees, and are far more likely to be extended to non‐U.S. borrowers and to borrowers in riskier countries. Project finance credits also involve more participating banks, have fewer loan covenants, are more likely to use fixed‐rate rather than floating‐rate loan pricing, and are more likely to be extended to borrowers in tangible‐asset‐rich industries, such as real estate and electric utilities. Despite being nonrecourse finance, floating‐rate project finance loans have lower credit spreads (over LIBOR) than do most comparable non‐PF loans. The authors also report that projects funded with PF loans are heavily leveraged, with an average loan to value ratio of 67%. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Corporate Finance Wiley

ARE PROJECT FINANCE LOANS DIFFERENT FROM OTHER SYNDICATED CREDITS?

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/are-project-finance-loans-different-from-other-syndicated-credits-2rrXXR0mbN

References (6)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
1078-1196
eISSN
1745-6622
DOI
10.1111/j.1745-6622.2000.tb00043.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper provides the first full‐length empirical analysis of project finance, which is defined as “limited or non‐recourse financing of a newly to be developed project through the establishment of a vehicle company.” The article compares the characteristics of a sample of 4,956 project finance loans (worth $634 billion) to comparable samples of non‐project finance loans, all of which are drawn from a comprehensive sample of 90,784 syndicated loans (worth $13.2 trillion) booked on international capital markets since 1980. The authors find that project finance (PF) loans differ significantly from non‐project finance loans in that PF loans have a longer average maturity, are more likely to have third‐party guarantees, and are far more likely to be extended to non‐U.S. borrowers and to borrowers in riskier countries. Project finance credits also involve more participating banks, have fewer loan covenants, are more likely to use fixed‐rate rather than floating‐rate loan pricing, and are more likely to be extended to borrowers in tangible‐asset‐rich industries, such as real estate and electric utilities. Despite being nonrecourse finance, floating‐rate project finance loans have lower credit spreads (over LIBOR) than do most comparable non‐PF loans. The authors also report that projects funded with PF loans are heavily leveraged, with an average loan to value ratio of 67%.

Journal

Journal of Applied Corporate Finance – Wiley

Published: Mar 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.