Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Katz, A. Neugebauer (2001)
Does satisfaction with abilities mediate the relationship between the impact of rheumatoid arthritis on valued activities and depressive symptoms?Arthritis and rheumatism, 45 3
H. Montgomery, L. Persson, A. Rydén (1996)
Importance and attainment of life values among disabled and non-disabled people.Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine, 28 4
V. Viemerö, Christina Krause (1998)
Quality of Life in Individuals with Physical DisabilitiesPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 67
E. Wilander, M. Lundqvist, K. Öberg (1989)
Gastrointestinal Carcinoid Tumours: Histogenetic, Histochemical, Immunohistochemical, Clinical and Therapeutic AspectsProgress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 19
R. Abresch, Nancy Seyden, M. Wineinger (1998)
Quality of life. Issues for persons with neuromuscular diseases.Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America, 9 1
G. Larsson, P. Sjödén, K. Öberg, L. Essen (1999)
Importance-satisfaction discrepancies are associated with health-related quality of life in five-year survivors of endocrine gastrointestinal tumours.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 10 11
R. Stensman (2020)
Severely mobility-disabled people assess the quality of their lives.Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine, 17 2
G. Larsson, L. Essen, P. Sjödén (1998)
Quality of life in patients with endocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: patient and staff perceptions.Cancer nursing, 21 6
S. Blalock, M. Orlando, E. Mutran, R. Devellis, B. Devellis (1998)
Effect of satisfaction with one's abilities on positive and negative affect among individuals with recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association, 11 3
N. Aaronson, S. Ahmedzai, B. Bergman, M. Bullinger, A. Cull, N. Duez, A. Filiberti, H. Flechtner, S. Fleishman, J. Haes, S. Kaasa, M. Klee, D. Osoba, D. Razavi, Peter Rofe, S. Schraub, K. Sneeuw, M. Sullivan, F. Takeda (1993)
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85 5
A. Bandura (1989)
Human agency in social cognitive theory.The American psychologist, 44 9
G. Larsson, L. Essen, P. Sjödén (1999)
Health-related quality of life in patients with endocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract.Acta oncologica, 38 4
Öberg Öberg (1999)
Neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumors – a condensed overview of diagnosis and treatmentAnnals of Oncology, 10
G. Larsson, K. Haglund, L. Essen (2003)
Distress, quality of life and strategies to 'keep a good mood' in patients with carcinoid tumours: patient and staff perceptions.European journal of cancer care, 12 1
Gunnel Erik (2001)
Health-related Quality of Life, Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Midgut Carcinoid TumoursActa Oncologica, 40
S. Blalock, B. Devellis, R. Devellis, K. Giorgino, S. Sauter, J. Jordan, F. Keefe, E. Mutran (1992)
Psychological well-being among people with recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis. Do self-perceptions of abilities make a difference?Arthritis and rheumatism, 35 11
The aims of this study were to investigate: (1) whether ratings of importance of, satisfaction with, and symptom/function of specific health‐related quality‐of‐life (HRQoL) aspects are related, and (2) whether an importance–satisfaction discrepancy with regard to ratings of a specific HRQoL aspect is a valid indicator of distress. Eighty‐three patients with endocrine gastrointestinal tumours completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ‐C30) and answered questions about importance of, satisfaction with, and symptom/function of 12 HRQoL aspects. The patients reported a relatively high HRQoL in terms of physical, emotional and social function. Most of the HRQoL aspects were considered as important for a good quality of life. High satisfaction was related to fewer symptoms and a better function. Patients who assigned a higher importance than satisfaction rating to an aspect reported a lower quality of life for the same aspect. The findings suggest that importance–satisfaction discrepancies are valid indicators of patient distress and illustrate the importance of asking patients not only about frequency and level of symptoms, but also about importance of and satisfaction with when assessing patient quality of life.
European Journal of Cancer Care – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.