Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/analysis-of-case-only-studies-accounting-for-genotyping-error-4o151Wn7uC
References (26)
-
D. Umbach, C. Weinberg (1997)
Designing and analysing case-control studies to exploit independence of genotype and exposure.Statistics in medicine, 16 15
-
D. Gordon, Yaning Yang, Chad Haynes, S. Finch, N. Mendell, A. Brown, V. Haroutunian (2004)
Increasing Power for Tests of Genetic Association in the Presence of Phenotype and/or Genotype Error by Use of Double-SamplingStatistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 3
-
N. Chatterjee, R. Carroll (2005)
Semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation exploiting gene-environment independence in case-control studiesBiometrika, 92
-
Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 6:18-29 (2001) -
D. Gordon, J. Ott (2001)
Assessment and management of single nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis, 2001
-
P. Smith, N. Day (1984)
The design of case-control studies: the influence of confounding and interaction effects.International journal of epidemiology, 13 3
-
A. Mitchell, D. Cutler, A. Chakravarti (2003)
Undetected genotyping errors cause apparent overtransmission of common alleles in the transmission/disequilibrium test.American journal of human genetics, 72 3
-
P. Albert, D. Ratnasinghe, J. Tangrea, S. Wacholder (2001)
Limitations of the case-only design for identifying gene-environment interactions.American journal of epidemiology, 154 8
-
B. Armstrong (2003)
Fixed Factors that Modify the Effects of Time-Varying Factors: Applying the Case-Only ApproachEpidemiology, 14
-
Darlene Goldstein, Hongyu Zhao, Terence Speed (1997)
The effects of genotyping errors and interference on estimation of genetic distance.Human heredity, 47 2
-
A. Tenenbein (1972)
A Double Sampling Scheme for Estimating from Misclassified Multinomial Data with Applications to Sampling InspectionTechnometrics, 14
-
(2007)
An Introduction to the Bootstrap -
D. Gordon, SimonC. Heath, J. Ott (1999)
True Pedigree Errors More Frequent Than Apparent Errors for Single Nucleotide PolymorphismsHuman Heredity, 49
-
W. Piegorsch, W. Piegorsch, C. Weinberg, Jack Taylor (1994)
Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies.Statistics in medicine, 13 2
-
Kenneth Buetow (1991)
Influence of aberrant observations on high-resolution linkage analysis outcomes.American journal of human genetics, 49 5
-
N. Gatto, U. Campbell, A. Rundle, H. Ahsan (2004)
Further development of the case-only design for assessing gene-environment interaction: evaluation of and adjustment for bias.International journal of epidemiology, 33 5
-
J. Douglas, M. Boehnke, K. Lange (2000)
A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.American journal of human genetics, 66 4
-
J. Douglas, Andrew Skol, M. Boehnke (2002)
Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.American journal of human genetics, 70 2
-
D. Gordon, T. Matise, S. Heath, J. Ott (1999)
Power loss for multiallelic transmission/disequilibrium test when errors introduced: GAW11 simulated dataGenetic Epidemiology, 17
-
G. Abecasis, S. Cherny, L. Cardon (2001)
The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traitsEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 9
-
K. Cheng, K. Cheng (2006)
A maximum likelihood method for studying gene–environment interactions under conditional independence of genotype and exposureStatistics in Medicine, 25
-
Derek Gordon, Simon Heath, Xin Liu, Jurg Ott (2001)
A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data.American journal of human genetics, 69 2
-
R. Morris, N. Kaplan (2004)
Testing for association with a case‐parents design in the presence of genotyping errorsGenetic Epidemiology, 26
-
K. Hao, Xiaobin Wang (2005)
Incorporating Individual Error Rate into Association Test of Unmatched Case-Control DesignHuman Heredity, 58
-
K. Rice, P. Holmans (2003)
Allowing for Genotyping Error in Analysis of Unmatched Case‐Control StudiesAnnals of Human Genetics, 67
-
Pamela Marcus, Richard Hayes, Paolo Vineis, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Neil Caporaso, Herman Autrup, Robert Branch, Jürgen Brockmöller, Takashi Ishizaki, Ali Karakaya, J. Ladero, Soren Mommsen, Henrik Okkels, Marjorie Romkes, Ivar Roots, Nathaniel Rothman (2000)
Cigarette smoking, N-acetyltransferase 2 acetylation status, and bladder cancer risk: a case-series meta-analysis of a gene-environment interaction.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 9 5
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2007 Wiley Subscription Services
- ISSN
- 0003-4800
- eISSN
- 1469-1809
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00314.x
- pmid
- 16984488
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The case‐only design provides one approach to assess possible interactions between genetic and environmental factors. It has been shown that if these factors are conditionally independent, then a case‐only analysis is not only valid but also very efficient. However, a drawback of the case‐only approach is that its conclusions may be biased by genotyping errors. In this paper, our main aim is to propose a method for analysis of case‐only studies when these errors occur. We show that the bias can be adjusted through the use of internal validation data, which are obtained by genotyping some sampled individuals twice. Our analysis is based on a simple and yet highly efficient conditional likelihood approach. Simulation studies considered in this paper confirm that the new method has acceptable performance under genotyping errors.
Journal
Annals of Human Genetics – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2007